User Tag List
Results 31 to 45 of 77
-
08-30-2024, 11:12 AM #31
two handed Stihl...........
-
OnPad liked this post
-
08-30-2024, 11:41 AM #32
-
-
08-30-2024, 12:01 PM #33
3/8ths two handed handle starter rope if little (use ta be) like me!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
-
OnPad liked this post
-
08-31-2024, 03:07 PM #34
Member
- Join Date
- Aug 2021
- Location
- Wisconsin
- Posts
- 54
- Thanks (Given)
- 5
- Thanks (Received)
- 5
- Likes (Given)
- 6
- Likes (Received)
- 7
- Mentioned
- 0 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
What's the difference between 18787c4 and 18488c4? I got a pair of c5 I'm looking to swap for better compression
-
08-31-2024, 03:45 PM #35
Last edited by OnPad; 08-31-2024 at 05:32 PM.
-
LakeFever liked this post
-
09-02-2024, 04:10 PM #36
Here's my workings on this.(in metric)
2.5L engine
Bore is 8.90cm
Stroke above exhaust port is 3.9cm (some wriggle room on that)
Swept volume is 242cm3.(242cc)
Head chamber volume 30cc and squish volume is 6cm3 (6cc)
Add all those together = 278.82cc
Devide that by the chamber volume plus the squish volume.
Squish is part of the chamber volume.
278.22cc ÷ 36cc =9.27/1 ratio.
If that's wrong then someone should pipe in and say so.
9.27/1 is up there but ok for. Good gas and cool plugs/ piston imo
This also assumes 100% volumetric efficiency and 0 leakageLast edited by NZ Sidewinder; 09-02-2024 at 04:12 PM.
-
OnPad liked this post
-
09-02-2024, 05:06 PM #37
-
OnPad liked this post
-
09-02-2024, 05:21 PM #38
No compensation for altitude. All the guys at sea level could add 8-9% to my 130lbs. Your right there is some extra space under that Schrader valve that could account for a few more lbs. That puts it closer to the 150lbs at sea level that everyone else is claiming.
Here I am trying to figure out a compression gauge
while NZSidewinder is posting fancy corrected compression ratio calculations. What a show off.
-
-
09-02-2024, 06:18 PM #39
I've got the exact same pairs of heads in front of me right now.
I'm aiming for 160psi.
Here's the unknown.
Squish protects the edge of the piston and probably the high point of the liner from the flame front during the period of piston travel where its moving much more slowly than mid stroke.
So for 160psi, do I want to use the 2.0L head with a .040 cut or the big chamber 2.5L head with the narrower squish band and a .140 cut?
If you draw a circle around a cross section view of this squish area, it will prove to be full of secrets.
There was a comment here somewhere that people forget how long ago the 1980s were.
This is correct
I call the marine shops and automatically assume that the parts guy knows what a 2.5 merc is.
I mean what other motors are there?
But of course 2.5 mercs are almost extinct and the parts guy wasn't even born in the 80s.Last edited by NZ Sidewinder; 09-02-2024 at 06:23 PM.
-
09-02-2024, 06:32 PM #40
All I can add to that is a fast boat guy I ran into at the launch who had a Bridgeport on a Ventura said he ran these heads on a 2.5 FF like mine and it worked amazing. I’ll cc mine when I get around to this mod. Maybe tomorrow if I can squeak the time in to do this
Hydrostream dreamin
-
OnPad liked this post
-
09-02-2024, 06:41 PM #41
Heres a link to a interesting article.
http://www.powercdi.com/manual/combu...squish/en.html
-
powerabout thanked for this post
-
09-03-2024, 02:36 AM #42
Just a point on cranking compression readings.
There are two types of cylinder liners that affect compression readings at cranking speed.
Standard and exhaust relief.
The exhaust relief engine will have lower cranking compression compared to a similar engine without exhaust reliefs.
This came up just today when a racing administrator suggested to me that a restricted race class could be subject to compression tests.
I pointed out that an exhaust relief engine could have cut heads yet return low compression test numbers
-
09-03-2024, 05:22 AM #43
Thread: 2.0L 135 fatblock heads on 2.5L 200?
how did we get this far off topic..... those have been around on tha 2.0, 2.4, 2.5 150/175's for a very long time.. its well known that crankin' comp is effected by a few lbs. with that liner...
i'm still waitin' on someone ta take bone stock "fat block" 2.0 heads and bolt 'em on a 2.5 "fat block" and come up with this mystical number?????..............................
-
09-03-2024, 07:01 AM #44working on it
i'm still waitin' on someone ta take bone stock "fat block" 2.0 heads and bolt 'em on a 2.5 "fat block" and come up with this mystical number?????..............................
Hydrostream dreamin
-
NICE PAIR liked this post
-
09-03-2024, 07:10 AM #45
Similar Threads
-
2.4 Fatblock which heads to cut? 2.4 or 2.5?
By coffeeguy in forum Technical DiscussionReplies: 5Last Post: 12-30-2014, 11:31 PM -
1991 2.4 Fatblock Cutting Heads and other cheap hp gains
By coffeeguy in forum Technical DiscussionReplies: 0Last Post: 12-27-2014, 01:54 PM -
Bridgeport, fatblock? what does this mean?
By tfrizz80 in forum Technical DiscussionReplies: 8Last Post: 09-27-2012, 04:13 PM -
Fatblock
By Jerry Millington in forum Technical DiscussionReplies: 12Last Post: 06-20-2006, 11:06 AM



Thanks:
Likes:
Reply With Quote






