User Tag List

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 16 to 28 of 28
  1. #16
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    slough, england, united kingdom
    Posts
    1,400
    Thanks (Given)
    143
    Thanks (Received)
    68
    Likes (Given)
    407
    Likes (Received)
    187
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    what exactly is the speed your after ?

  2. #17
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Livingston, Louisiana
    Posts
    2,191
    Thanks (Given)
    76
    Thanks (Received)
    273
    Likes (Given)
    569
    Likes (Received)
    972
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Agree 1.87 gear is better choice for boat/ motor combo. But if he is not on rev limiter and keep same prop I'm afaraid his speed won't change just turn less rpm. Now 1.87 gear and prop change may be an improvement but costly. That's why I suggest play with props and set up instead. Most props can be tried on a loaner program. If it doesn't work your not out much. Change gears and your out. I feel you can run just as fast with 2.0 with enough pitch and bite for less$$

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Albany, NY
    Posts
    92
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    7
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    31
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    torgue is ET and RPM is MPH. That being said it's easier to set up on the 2:1 gear ratio but more gains can be made with 1.87.

  4. #19
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Location
    Geneva, Florida
    Posts
    106
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    2
    Likes (Given)
    6
    Likes (Received)
    12
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by W2F a V-King View Post
    Is the ECU holding you back, or are you out of motor at that 6500?
    Isn't the rpm limiter on a PM 225 kicking in about that RPM? The ECU starts adding fuel to keep the RPM's down?

    Either way, on a small light boat with a lot of power, the 1:87 would be my choice of the two ratios... Then prop up or down accordingly.
    They come stock with the 1:87.

    I think the stock rev limiter is 6800. I've run it in the he 80's with a 26p prop about 1-1/2 to 2" below the pad. My tack wasn't working at the time but if you figure it at the slip I am running now (6.3%) then I believe my rpms were close to 7100. Can't say for sure though. I bought the motor without a power and a 2:1 was what I had laying around. I may just be out of motor, it gets to around 6500 rpm's and that's it.

  5. #20
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Lake Coochiching, Ontario
    Posts
    8,431
    Thanks (Given)
    43
    Thanks (Received)
    398
    Likes (Given)
    660
    Likes (Received)
    2112
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    You are further below the pad than normal for a light 90 mph boat. It would be much less expensive to play with engine height and props than to change gears.

  6. #21
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Location
    Geneva, Florida
    Posts
    106
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    2
    Likes (Given)
    6
    Likes (Received)
    12
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by phillnjack View Post
    what exactly is the speed your after ?
    Whatever I can get without getting into my motor.

  7. #22
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Location
    Geneva, Florida
    Posts
    106
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    2
    Likes (Given)
    6
    Likes (Received)
    12
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by David View Post
    You are further below the pad than normal for a light 90 mph boat. It would be much less expensive to play with engine height and props than to change gears.

    I've raised the motor up since then and replaced my tach. I'm about 3/4" below the pad now. That's where it runs 92mph with a 32p cleaver. I have been out of town for two months and haven't had a chance to play with my set up any more yet. I'm just trying to get some direction because this is all pretty new to me.

  8. #23
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Livingston, Louisiana
    Posts
    2,191
    Thanks (Given)
    76
    Thanks (Received)
    273
    Likes (Given)
    569
    Likes (Received)
    972
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    3/4 below pad is pretty low for light boat especially with a cleaver. Also I would think an et style prop would be faster?

  9. Likes Frank Molé, texasvector liked this post
  10. #24
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Location
    Geneva, Florida
    Posts
    106
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    2
    Likes (Given)
    6
    Likes (Received)
    12
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by FORBESAUTO View Post
    3/4 below pad is pretty low for light boat especially with a cleaver. Also I would think an et style prop would be faster?
    I am going to raise the motor some and I have a buddy with a 32 et I'm going to try next weekend.

  11. #25
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Location
    NE Tennessee
    Posts
    1,639
    Thanks (Given)
    257
    Thanks (Received)
    136
    Likes (Given)
    1991
    Likes (Received)
    620
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Sounds like your just about there with what you have now. And getting a second LU with a cone and LWPU is no cheap option. But it might be cheaper than going into the motor, depending on what you do.

    You could always get a set of 1.87 gears and put them in the LU you have.

    Just my opinion, but the 1.87 ratio is better for you for the top end pull.
    James H. W2F a V-King... Want 2 Fly a V-King

    Dedicated Site for Hydrostreams >> http://hydrostreamforums.com/
    My Project 1979 V-King restore >> http://hydrostreamforums.com/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=2761

  12. #26
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    CHAIN O LAKES, IL
    Posts
    1,069
    Thanks (Given)
    56
    Thanks (Received)
    12
    Likes (Given)
    220
    Likes (Received)
    85
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I assume u have a sportmaster case? if so ......get the propshaft even with the bottom and put on the 32"et....take all the junk out the boat and run her down to 5gal fuel or less and go fast.
    should do 95.

  13. #27
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Location
    Geneva, Florida
    Posts
    106
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    2
    Likes (Given)
    6
    Likes (Received)
    12
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by RIVERRUMMER 70 View Post
    I assume u have a sportmaster case? if so ......get the propshaft even with the bottom and put on the 32"et....take all the junk out the boat and run her down to 5gal fuel or less and go fast.
    should do 95.
    No it's not a sportmaster. It's just a standard 2:1 with a Bob's nose cone.

  14. #28
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    houston, tx
    Posts
    1,464
    Thanks (Given)
    32
    Thanks (Received)
    62
    Likes (Given)
    485
    Likes (Received)
    289
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    On your boat a 200 case with a cone should be faster on top end than a sports master anyway. It has to punch a smaller hole through the water.

  15. Likes RIVERRUMMER 70 liked this post
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2

Similar Threads

  1. Mercury Tech: 245 versus 260
    By bullwhipjkg in forum Technical Discussion
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 02-25-2010, 02:45 PM
  2. synthetic versus conventional in gearcase
    By Eric Schultz in forum Technical Discussion
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 05-15-2008, 04:18 PM
  3. 50:1 versus 25:1
    By capnzee in forum Technical Discussion
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 08-16-2007, 03:41 PM
  4. C-5 Z-06 versus C-6 which is better
    By Charlie M in forum Other Motorsports
    Replies: 57
    Last Post: 12-22-2006, 11:31 PM
  5. OMC v6 200 versus 225 ('96)
    By tcsmith315 in forum Technical Discussion
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 08-01-2003, 05:42 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •