User Tag List

Page 7 of 8 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 LastLast
Results 91 to 105 of 113
  1. #91
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Palm City Fla
    Posts
    7,497
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    944
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    6994
    Mentioned
    13 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by cali kid View Post
    Appreciate your taking time for my questions. The 3 liter really is not a rpm motor, without major modification. I like the big cubic inch approach. No need to turn 4 liters 8000+ rpm. A 1:62 with a 34" wheel at 7k will give you all the speed you need. I have been afraid to mess with the X sleeve transfers, loosing charge out the exhaust, and lack of bottom end come to mind. I like the torque monster approach, a lot easier to keep together, than a high rpm screamer. BTW are you using Simon for your re-flash? Thanks again.
    I agree 100% There is no need in trying to turn an apple onto an orange .
    Big , torquey and keep the compression down to where it will run on 93 + a splash of home brew octane booster ( for piece of mind if nothing else ) .
    I love the way a stock 300 will chuff along all day between five and six thousand RPM , and that's one attribute I would never want to move away from . But it's nice to have a motor that will pull a big prop from there if need be , without tying itself in a knot.
    The biggest issues with going big is that all the parts are customs . Which means no short run's of " I'll take six and maybe a couple spares" . So it's always bulk , and they generally are just shy of twice the price of shelf parts .
    After you have a quarter inch's worth of aluminum on the floor , you see there is not a lot of transfer port depth left . I guess the good thing about that is , since there is so much material that need's to be removed , you can make / shape / put the ports where you want them . If your not half nuts already , you will be after the time it takes with your head , hands , tools and three different lights stuck down every little nook and cranny ...
    The bore gets out into the stock O-rig location , which either needs to be welded up and moved outboard , or a set of billet heads that fit the application .
    PCM's , I guess I'm fortunate enough to have a pair of stock 300x box's .
    Tough job writing a tune up in Wisconsin and having the parts that will swing far enough to run good in Alaska or along the equator . It would be foolish for the aftermarket to target a tune up for one , then if down the road , the motor got sold to someone in the other , it could possibly be a slug of stick in the good air .
    It's not optimum , but what I will do on these motor's is use a pair of 550 cc/min injectors in 5 and 6 . The standard 470 - 495 cc/min in 1 - 4 . Use an adjustable fuel pressure regulator for a global adjustment and a potentiometer on the IAT sensor for fine adjustment . Maybe some day we can avoid having to do all that . Just download an app and adjust ICT / ICFC from your cell phone , on the fly or at Gilligan's Island ..

  2. Likes NICE PAIR, stoker2001 liked this post
  3. #92
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Silverton section of Toms River, NJ/Stuart, Florida
    Posts
    10,206
    Thanks (Given)
    374
    Thanks (Received)
    314
    Likes (Given)
    821
    Likes (Received)
    2001
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Never happen.............your phone is to busy at Gilligan's Island taking pictures

  4. #93
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    7,913
    Thanks (Given)
    95
    Thanks (Received)
    603
    Likes (Given)
    4699
    Likes (Received)
    8635
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	540full-gilligan's-island-photo.jpg 
Views:	253 
Size:	191.3 KB 
ID:	388262
    I CAN ALWAYS MAKE ANOTHER DOLLAR, BUT I CANNOT MAKE ANOTHER DAY

  5. #94
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    hardyville va
    Posts
    368
    Thanks (Given)
    7
    Thanks (Received)
    38
    Likes (Given)
    1
    Likes (Received)
    43
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Chaz View Post
    I agree 100% There is no need in trying to turn an apple onto an orange .
    Big , torquey and keep the compression down to where it will run on 93 + a splash of home brew octane booster ( for piece of mind if nothing else ) .
    I love the way a stock 300 will chuff along all day between five and six thousand RPM , and that's one attribute I would never want to move away from . But it's nice to have a motor that will pull a big prop from there if need be , without tying itself in a knot.
    The biggest issues with going big is that all the parts are customs . Which means no short run's of " I'll take six and maybe a couple spares" . So it's always bulk , and they generally are just shy of twice the price of shelf parts .
    After you have a quarter inch's worth of aluminum on the floor , you see there is not a lot of transfer port depth left . I guess the good thing about that is , since there is so much material that need's to be removed , you can make / shape / put the ports where you want them . If your not half nuts already , you will be after the time it takes with your head , hands , tools and three different lights stuck down every little nook and cranny ...
    The bore gets out into the stock O-rig location , which either needs to be welded up and moved outboard , or a set of billet heads that fit the application .
    PCM's , I guess I'm fortunate enough to have a pair of stock 300x box's .
    Tough job writing a tune up in Wisconsin and having the parts that will swing far enough to run good in Alaska or along the equator . It would be foolish for the aftermarket to target a tune up for one , then if down the road , the motor got sold to someone in the other , it could possibly be a slug of stick in the good air .
    It's not optimum , but what I will do on these motor's is use a pair of 550 cc/min injectors in 5 and 6 . The standard 470 - 495 cc/min in 1 - 4 . Use an adjustable fuel pressure regulator for a global adjustment and a potentiometer on the IAT sensor for fine adjustment . Maybe some day we can avoid having to do all that . Just download an app and adjust ICT / ICFC from your cell phone , on the fly or at Gilligan's Island ..
    5 and 6 do run hot. Good idea on fat injectors, not much room left for oversize at 3.999.

  6. #95
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Palm City Fla
    Posts
    7,497
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    944
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    6994
    Mentioned
    13 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by vnemous View Post
    Never happen.............your phone is to busy at Gilligan's Island taking pictures
    I got a new Galaxy 8 the other day .. It seems your right , it has a better camera than my Nikon ...

    Mrs. ( lovey) Howell appears interested , and she already has a pearl necklace ...

    At 3.999 , it's got room to go out to ..... 4.000

  7. Likes NICE PAIR liked this post
  8. #96
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    7,913
    Thanks (Given)
    95
    Thanks (Received)
    603
    Likes (Given)
    4699
    Likes (Received)
    8635
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Chaz, the 550cc injectors will be running at a lower duty cycle but, because of size, pushing more full? The pulse width, etc. will still be the same as the 470-495s though being the PCM has not been changed?

    The extra heat in the bottom 2 holes is from dilution coming in from the other holes blowing in or just because the block is hotter in that area from all the other holes having their exhaust run past?
    I CAN ALWAYS MAKE ANOTHER DOLLAR, BUT I CANNOT MAKE ANOTHER DAY

  9. #97
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Albany, NY
    Posts
    92
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    7
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    31
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    How about total loss and remove timing from those cylinders

  10. #98
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Palm City Fla
    Posts
    7,497
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    944
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    6994
    Mentioned
    13 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by AZMIDLYF View Post
    Chaz, the 550cc injectors will be running at a lower duty cycle but, because of size, pushing more full? The pulse width, etc. will still be the same as the 470-495s though being the PCM has not been changed?
    All I can do is buy what's out there and take them to the guy we use and have him blow some junk thru them to see if they are what I already have or if they actually do have a higher cc/min value . And yes , sometimes they flow even less .. I'm not sure how they arrive at their ability to flow higher numbers . But they would have to either raise the pintle higher , or that the orifice is a larger diameter , or a little of both ...
    It works like a progressive nitrous controller . Say you had a 300 HP jet spread and set the box to ramp from 50 to 100% in one second . Even though it feels like 150 HP , what's really happening is you are getting 300 HP for 50% of the time , or as you more accurately described it , pulse width modulation .
    The ECU works within it's parameters . As long as the injector has the same coil resistance and there is no "last ditch" effort like an O2 sensor to check what kind of job it's doing , it will go un noticed .
    The only issue I see is that most guys say that an injector is properly sized when it's running along at 85% duty cycle . Not to big that it's blubbery at idle , and not too small that it will go lean at max torque where fuel demand is at it's highest .

    The extra heat in the bottom 2 holes is from dilution coming in from the other holes blowing in or just because the block is hotter in that area from all the other holes having their exhaust run past?
    C - Not having the luxury of actual header pipe length ( log ) that the cylinders above it have . The bottom guys never get a column formed and the scavenging it would provide .
    As well as D - all of the above ...

    Snotrekie
    How about total loss and remove timing from those cylinders


    Total loss .. Geez , you must be old . I haven't heard that term since I set points with a match book cover ...

    Funny you would mention timing ...

    I kind of come from the nitrous 4 stroke world where the main thing is getting the A/F ratio right and then manipulate the timing .
    Twords the end of my Top Dragster career , it was getting a lot easier to tune by the crankcase vacuum graph . If it had too much fuel or timing in it , the motor would start fluttering the rings off their seat . If the hydrocarbon ring was still just a wispff at the base , then pulling a couple degree's out would normally clean it up . As a rule , I ran 1-2* less on the passenger side bank , and 1-3* more than that on # 2 .

    Two strokes seem to love fuel , up to a point . Then like everything else , they will run out of the ability to move more air and go dead rich .
    Maybe down the road we will be able to give each cylinder exactly what it wants .. for now , it seems a little cost prohibitive for the average guy

    Till then , it's like David Bowie says ... I've been putting out the fire ... with gasoline ..

  11. Likes NICE PAIR liked this post
  12. #99
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    7,913
    Thanks (Given)
    95
    Thanks (Received)
    603
    Likes (Given)
    4699
    Likes (Received)
    8635
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Too bad you don't have the room to shroud those bottom ports and have the adaptor/tuner become its log so to speak. Like you said though: cost prohibitive for the general population.
    I CAN ALWAYS MAKE ANOTHER DOLLAR, BUT I CANNOT MAKE ANOTHER DAY

  13. #100
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Palm City Fla
    Posts
    7,497
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    944
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    6994
    Mentioned
    13 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    I went with the "more direct line of sight" approach . Time will tell .
    Funny you mentioned the adapter plate You can see that there is little to no color on the left side . Rightfully so since it's the short turn radius . Perfect place to put half a megaphone . Air has a hard enough time going around a corner without the bottom falling out from underneath it .



    If one bass-ackwards ski slope is good , two has gotz to be better ...
    I don't know if it's comical or just down right sad that this is the kind of stuff that's put out there .


    And is it me , or does it look like they went .. >
    Hey Goober , what can we use fer the exhaust pipe on this here tuner ...

    Welp ... we still got us some of that 4" channel iron left over .. all we gotta do is face two pieces together with some 1/2" tweenst em .. an ya gotz you a 3.0L racin exhaust ..


  14. #101
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Singapore/Melbourne/Italy
    Posts
    9,333
    Thanks (Given)
    1065
    Thanks (Received)
    412
    Likes (Given)
    4725
    Likes (Received)
    2174
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    maybe like an OMC, all the twists and turns dont seem to hurt till about 7000rpm?

  15. #102
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    7,913
    Thanks (Given)
    95
    Thanks (Received)
    603
    Likes (Given)
    4699
    Likes (Received)
    8635
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Budget ran out by that time...

    Guess it leaves more opportunity for the creative minds that be...
    I CAN ALWAYS MAKE ANOTHER DOLLAR, BUT I CANNOT MAKE ANOTHER DAY

  16. #103
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Palm City Fla
    Posts
    7,497
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    944
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    6994
    Mentioned
    13 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by powerabout View Post
    maybe like an OMC, all the twists and turns dont seem to hurt till about 7000rpm?
    Ginger or MaryAnn ... ???

    Budget ran out by that time...
    As poorly as they are cast and machined , they must have broke the bank before they started ..

  17. #104
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Singapore/Melbourne/Italy
    Posts
    9,333
    Thanks (Given)
    1065
    Thanks (Received)
    412
    Likes (Given)
    4725
    Likes (Received)
    2174
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Merc following OMC, if it will only ever go to 6000, we dont need to pay much attention

  18. #105
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Palm City Fla
    Posts
    7,497
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    944
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    6994
    Mentioned
    13 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Yes , how foolish of me . Somehow I thought they both still took pride in their work ..

  19. Likes NICE PAIR liked this post
Page 7 of 8 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Queston for US1, JSRE or Greg Moss. How loose is too loose??
    By DUCKY in forum Technical Discussion
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 08-30-2019, 04:43 PM
  2. About to loose it!
    By ufish2 in forum Technical Discussion
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 11-17-2013, 06:55 PM
  3. Mercury Tech: my prop is loose.....
    By Surfer Dave in forum Technical Discussion
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 04-21-2010, 03:11 PM
  4. Hey Andy,Loose Something?
    By Capt.Doug Metko in forum The Scream And Fly Lounge
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 02-15-2007, 05:44 PM
  5. 17' baker too loose
    By tres in forum Props, Setup, and Rigging
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 03-20-2004, 01:04 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Progression Boats