User Tag List

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 21
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    vonore tn.
    Posts
    248
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    23
    Likes (Given)
    4
    Likes (Received)
    32
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    DFI or 4strk, best torque & acceleration

    Am I wrong. All the 3.0litre Mercury OPTIMAX, Have more torque & acceleration than any of the newer 4strk's in the same size HP rating. Anyone have comparisons of the same boat with new 4strk. power. THANKS.

  2. Likes David - WI liked this post
  3. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Plainville, CT
    Posts
    866
    Thanks (Given)
    476
    Thanks (Received)
    30
    Likes (Given)
    443
    Likes (Received)
    77
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Good question. Hope somebody can answer it. I've never heard anything negative about the "new" four-strokes. Can that be possible?

  4. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Lake Coochiching, Ontario
    Posts
    8,441
    Thanks (Given)
    43
    Thanks (Received)
    402
    Likes (Given)
    664
    Likes (Received)
    2116
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I think the 300R is faster and has better acceleration. That’s been discussed a bunch on the main board here.

  5. Thanks Glastron1987 thanked for this post
    Likes Glastron1987 liked this post
  6. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2023
    Location
    Long island, NY
    Posts
    1,454
    Thanks (Given)
    168
    Thanks (Received)
    227
    Likes (Given)
    513
    Likes (Received)
    734
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    From what I have heard, it's not a one size fits all answer. The four strokes have the torque advantage. But on the small lightweight boats the 2 strokes are faster. But on the bigger heavier boats the fourstrokes are faster. Setup is also a huge factor. Setups that work great on a 2 stroke works like **** on a fout stroke. And vice versa.

  7. Thanks Glastron1987 thanked for this post
    Likes Glastron1987 liked this post
  8. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    6,885
    Thanks (Given)
    1693
    Thanks (Received)
    1322
    Likes (Given)
    12043
    Likes (Received)
    7763
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by David View Post
    I think the 300R is faster and has better acceleration. That’s been discussed a bunch on the main board here.
    A 300R is 4.6L versus 3.2L for the 300XS Opti. Liter per liter (or dollar for dollar, or pound to pound) the 4-jokes aren't even close... a 4.6L Opti would easily be up 100hp on the 300R. (Plus cheaper, lighter, probably cleaner, etc.)

  9. Thanks Glastron1987 thanked for this post
    Likes Glastron1987 liked this post
  10. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    New Smyrna Beach, FL./LOTO
    Posts
    6,993
    Thanks (Given)
    679
    Thanks (Received)
    1081
    Likes (Given)
    1917
    Likes (Received)
    7941
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    I have not seen an instance where a (properly set up) 300R gets out run by any other 300 two stroke or 4 stroke unless they were modified or in a short drag spurt. We are discovering that you can really make a 300R run with some added compression and head work.

    Joe

  11. Thanks Glastron1987 thanked for this post
    Likes Glastron1987 liked this post
  12. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    6,885
    Thanks (Given)
    1693
    Thanks (Received)
    1322
    Likes (Given)
    12043
    Likes (Received)
    7763
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Still, a "modern" two-stroke of the same displacement built using state-of-the-art design and manufacturing would humiliate them.

    Example: all the modern 2-stroke kart & motorcycle engines use a different style bearing cage with a dramtically better lifespan. Modern = increased durability.

    Example: CNC porting noticeably improves tuneabily and output; along with durability.

    Example: modern engine management systems adjust fuel & timing on individual cylinders... increasing output and reliability.

    I just keep taking my vitamins and hoping I live long enough to see the next two-stroke Renaissance!

  13. Thanks Glastron1987 thanked for this post
    Likes Glastron1987, wolfgangb, 22R liked this post
  14. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    New Smyrna Beach, FL./LOTO
    Posts
    6,993
    Thanks (Given)
    679
    Thanks (Received)
    1081
    Likes (Given)
    1917
    Likes (Received)
    7941
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by David - WI View Post
    Still, a "modern" two-stroke of the same displacement built using state-of-the-art design and manufacturing would humiliate them.

    Example: all the modern 2-stroke kart & motorcycle engines use a different style bearing cage with a dramtically better lifespan. Modern = increased durability.

    Example: CNC porting noticeably improves tuneabily and output; along with durability.

    Example: modern engine management systems adjust fuel & timing on individual cylinders... increasing output and reliability.

    I just keep taking my vitamins and hoping I live long enough to see the next two-stroke Renaissance!

    There aren't enough vitamins; who is going to jump into the marine performance market against Mercury and then try to incorporate 2 emission requirements into their product line? 2 stroke performance outboards have sailed into the sunset unless you are at the drag races, Champ boat races, or vintage races. We ran over 80 miles today at a cruise of 90 to 115. These things just roll along at 5700 providing 111 mph on the dash. Fuel is a non-issue with low consumption and 87 octane available everywhere along our path on the St. Johns river between DeLand and Jacksonville.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	281.jpg 
Views:	41 
Size:	370.1 KB 
ID:	546407Click image for larger version. 

Name:	282.jpg 
Views:	40 
Size:	422.8 KB 
ID:	546408Click image for larger version. 

Name:	283.jpg 
Views:	41 
Size:	430.2 KB 
ID:	546409Click image for larger version. 

Name:	284.jpg 
Views:	41 
Size:	417.4 KB 
ID:	546410Click image for larger version. 

Name:	285.jpg 
Views:	41 
Size:	412.2 KB 
ID:	546411

    Joe

  15. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    6,885
    Thanks (Given)
    1693
    Thanks (Received)
    1322
    Likes (Given)
    12043
    Likes (Received)
    7763
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'm guessing it will be Mercury... the tide will turn back at some point; it has (to a limited extent) in snowmobiles, dirt bikes, and ATVs. Once you get past the "hype" people realize that four-strokes are not inherently cleaner, cheaper, lighter, more powerful, or more reliable than two-strokes built with equivalent technology.

    Maybe not until the next economic downturn... but the worm will probably turn again.

  16. #10
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Singapore/Melbourne/Italy
    Posts
    9,347
    Thanks (Given)
    1068
    Thanks (Received)
    415
    Likes (Given)
    4745
    Likes (Received)
    2181
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    how to put a 4stroke in a drag class?

  17. #11
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    6,885
    Thanks (Given)
    1693
    Thanks (Received)
    1322
    Likes (Given)
    12043
    Likes (Received)
    7763
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Also, 1970's era RAVE-style variable exhaust ports would add another 100hp to the top end and 50 lb-ft to the bottom end.

    All it would take to shift the product line back toward 2-strokes is a couple retirements and the right replacements... maybe a former Polaris or Bombardier exec gets hired to a key position?

    Maybe a couple board members at Brunswick age out and are replaced by a snowmobiler and a dirt bike rider who see through the 4-stroke hype?
    Last edited by David - WI; Yesterday at 12:17 PM.

  18. Likes 22R liked this post
  19. #12
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Louisiana
    Posts
    1,716
    Thanks (Given)
    526
    Thanks (Received)
    749
    Likes (Given)
    2877
    Likes (Received)
    3163
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The RAVE system was proposed on the initial launch of the 3.4L 300 motor but never made it to production. To my knowledge, the only motor that had the RAVE system was the 3 cylinder 115-150 just before BRP pulled the plug on Evinrude. It would be nice to know why this system never made it to production, on-paper seemed a good option.

  20. Thanks David - WI thanked for this post
    Likes David - WI liked this post
  21. #13
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Sunshine Coast, Queensland
    Posts
    209
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    8
    Likes (Given)
    2
    Likes (Received)
    66
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by JPEROG View Post
    There aren't enough vitamins; who is going to jump into the marine performance market against Mercury and then try to incorporate 2 emission requirements into their product line? 2 stroke performance outboards have sailed into the sunset unless you are at the drag races, Champ boat races, or vintage races. We ran over 80 miles today at a cruise of 90 to 115. These things just roll along at 5700 providing 111 mph on the dash. Fuel is a non-issue with low consumption and 87 octane available everywhere along our path on the St. Johns river between DeLand and Jacksonville.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	281.jpg 
Views:	41 
Size:	370.1 KB 
ID:	546407Click image for larger version. 

Name:	282.jpg 
Views:	40 
Size:	422.8 KB 
ID:	546408Click image for larger version. 

Name:	283.jpg 
Views:	41 
Size:	430.2 KB 
ID:	546409Click image for larger version. 

Name:	284.jpg 
Views:	41 
Size:	417.4 KB 
ID:	546410Click image for larger version. 

Name:	285.jpg 
Views:	41 
Size:	412.2 KB 
ID:	546411

    Joe

    They might work great for big boats like yours, but for us small (16'-21' ft) guys that don't want a huge, heavy apartment block hanging off the back, bring back the 2-strokes. Just as clean, just as fuel efficient, but most importantly, smaller and lighter.

  22. Likes David - WI, 22R liked this post
  23. #14
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Singapore/Melbourne/Italy
    Posts
    9,347
    Thanks (Given)
    1068
    Thanks (Received)
    415
    Likes (Given)
    4745
    Likes (Received)
    2181
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    There is some great data on Wildmans threads he has rigged them all new on same boats

  24. #15
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Plainville, CT
    Posts
    866
    Thanks (Given)
    476
    Thanks (Received)
    30
    Likes (Given)
    443
    Likes (Received)
    77
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    That would be great to see efficient 2-strokes, but I hope without adding too many parts and complications for things to go wrong.

  25. Likes David - WI liked this post
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. acceleration
    By rock in forum The Scream And Fly Lounge
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 01-17-2021, 10:29 PM
  2. Yamaha Tech: Bog on acceleration
    By bakerfreak in forum Technical Discussion
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 07-06-2012, 09:56 PM
  3. New Merc 150 4strk
    By Jim Gibbs in forum General Boating Discussion
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 01-11-2012, 09:26 PM
  4. best marathon platform (2strk, 4strk... etc etc)
    By bruce willis in forum General Boating Discussion
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 01-04-2011, 08:10 AM
  5. Acceleration
    By mirage243 in forum The Scream And Fly Lounge
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: 02-15-2009, 06:54 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •