User Tag List

Page 5 of 9 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 LastLast
Results 61 to 75 of 131
  1. #61
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Ontario
    Posts
    8,124
    Thanks (Given)
    205
    Thanks (Received)
    324
    Likes (Given)
    1938
    Likes (Received)
    2015
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by mrcrsr View Post
    Velocity stacks
    Almost LOL

  2. Likes mrcrsr liked this post
  3. #62
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Ontario
    Posts
    8,124
    Thanks (Given)
    205
    Thanks (Received)
    324
    Likes (Given)
    1938
    Likes (Received)
    2015
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by mrcrsr View Post
    The adi transfer ports are .045 Lower than an xs, which will kill top end rpm. Just picked up a 90 to port. I'm going to put the transfers .010 less than the xs, and probably go the same exhaust height as the xs. This thing with efi will have more bottom end torque with a common plenum intake than the stone age carbs would ever have, and I may even put the block in the press, I'll try that on a junk block first, and going with hi domes, compression will help the tork problem, and also going to focus on raising the crankcase compression. But this engine will also have spray
    That's a long common plenum. If we're dreaming I'd still prefer 6 individual TB but you're up to spraying and rpm with the xs ports. Crank will need all the support it can get. I think you'll get all the rpm you need with lower porting and increased area plus the spray jmo. Plus it'll have more psi, about 1/3-1/2 way to xs from adi ports. Still, consider extending the chest out a bit 1/4-3/8" with a spacer/divider to give some room under full song with spray. Almost stock length adi tuner( s ) but a bit wider , increasing at ends. With good area through the lower block and adapter.
    Fun stuff no doubt.
    Last edited by FMP; 12-18-2020 at 12:22 PM.

  4. Likes mrcrsr liked this post
  5. #63
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Shreveport, La.
    Posts
    3,226
    Thanks (Given)
    4
    Thanks (Received)
    75
    Likes (Given)
    60
    Likes (Received)
    492
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by mrcrsr View Post
    Velocity stacks

    Yes but I remember hearing years ago that there was a performance gain by changing the ones from a 115 to the ones from a 150.

  6. #64
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    port st. lucie, fl
    Posts
    5,741
    Thanks (Given)
    19
    Thanks (Received)
    52
    Likes (Given)
    660
    Likes (Received)
    493
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Da Bull View Post
    Yes but I remember hearing years ago that there was a performance gain by changing the ones from a 115 to the ones from a 150.
    Same basic carbs on all the 3 carb inlines, other than jetting and some other minor changes
    action mobile marine, 772 528 0754, dealers for aces fuel products,wolf efi, pro marine,latham and gaffrig/livorsi. we build gearcases and modify them(3 litre) to ratchet, and powerheads as well. 21 skater/3 litre wolf efi 113 mph the engine build http://www.screamandfly.com/showthre...-3-litre-build

  7. #65
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    15,417
    Thanks (Given)
    214
    Thanks (Received)
    476
    Likes (Given)
    7697
    Likes (Received)
    4265
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Id go right to the top of the xs specs put an aluminum flywheel on and send it. You are going to have to pull timing out up top. Kinda been there and melted this and that hosing an inline. You better send your pistons to Bud now for dome coating.

    I'll pm you some pics of what I have been messing with for the exhaust when I have idle time.

  8. Likes mrcrsr liked this post
  9. #66
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Ontario
    Posts
    8,124
    Thanks (Given)
    205
    Thanks (Received)
    324
    Likes (Given)
    1938
    Likes (Received)
    2015
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    It's from the internet, it must be right.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails T2_old_picture-20160529.jpg  

  10. Likes mrcrsr liked this post
  11. #67
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    15,417
    Thanks (Given)
    214
    Thanks (Received)
    476
    Likes (Given)
    7697
    Likes (Received)
    4265
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    At the crank ,maybe.

  12. Likes mrcrsr liked this post
  13. #68
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Ontario
    Posts
    8,124
    Thanks (Given)
    205
    Thanks (Received)
    324
    Likes (Given)
    1938
    Likes (Received)
    2015
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    If someone had enough whatever and the CNC machine and whatever else I think something trick could be done with the l6 chest. A new divider with isolated port sections, the block at the ports milled down to accept. A whole inlay to fit in the chest with angled port runners. The whole chest built out with a spacer for extra volume and the bottom of the block worked to accept. A new silo setup could also be done.

  14. Likes mrcrsr liked this post
  15. #69
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Shreveport, La.
    Posts
    3,226
    Thanks (Given)
    4
    Thanks (Received)
    75
    Likes (Given)
    60
    Likes (Received)
    492
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    What about resleeving for a bigger piston. I always thought an inline needed to be bigger than 100ci. Wayne Weeks would resleeve a V-4 to accept the pistons from the larger 2.6 235hp OMC. This made the V-4 110ci. No replacement for displacement.

    I know your just playing around but if you were competing in an open class this might be something to think about. My competitive side just takes over my thinking sometimes.
    Last edited by Da Bull; 12-19-2020 at 06:33 AM.

  16. Likes FMP, mrcrsr liked this post
  17. #70
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Ontario
    Posts
    8,124
    Thanks (Given)
    205
    Thanks (Received)
    324
    Likes (Given)
    1938
    Likes (Received)
    2015
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Waiting for someone to open a storage room somewhere and pull out a prototype Merc L6 looper.
    They had the L3 looper, tell me nobody made a few L6. L3 is 90hp I believe with lazy porting, triple carb, blind hole. More ci too.
    Weld two together, cut new crank , (123)-(456) , T2 order, two individual triple chests, who doesn't want one?

  18. Likes mrcrsr liked this post
  19. #71
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    15,417
    Thanks (Given)
    214
    Thanks (Received)
    476
    Likes (Given)
    7697
    Likes (Received)
    4265
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    There is no bore spacing left in the I6..and why would someone weld some junk together that is going to weigh more than a v6 and make less power.

  20. #72
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Ontario
    Posts
    8,124
    Thanks (Given)
    205
    Thanks (Received)
    324
    Likes (Given)
    1938
    Likes (Received)
    2015
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Because they can

  21. #73
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    38,676
    Thanks (Given)
    78
    Thanks (Received)
    1768
    Likes (Given)
    384
    Likes (Received)
    20413
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by FMP View Post
    Waiting for someone to open a storage room somewhere and pull out a prototype Merc L6 looper.
    They had the L3 looper, tell me nobody made a few L6. L3 is 90hp I believe with lazy porting, triple carb, blind hole. More ci too.
    Weld two together, cut new crank , (123)-(456) , T2 order, two individual triple chests, who doesn't want one?
    ...you name it. its already been done. decades ago. by quincy. who worked with, and for, kiekhaefer mercury. track down & buy one of the sixes he did...

  22. Likes Capt.Insane-o, mrcrsr liked this post
  23. #74
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Moline,Ill
    Posts
    3,090
    Thanks (Given)
    46
    Thanks (Received)
    131
    Likes (Given)
    516
    Likes (Received)
    1607
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	20170909_185049.jpg 
Views:	119 
Size:	315.2 KB 
ID:	479273


    is gone


  24. Likes Frank Molé, mrcrsr liked this post
  25. #75
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Ontario
    Posts
    8,124
    Thanks (Given)
    205
    Thanks (Received)
    324
    Likes (Given)
    1938
    Likes (Received)
    2015
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Yes, I know the motors, very nice.
    Closed chest version?

    Two L3 into 1 L6 done correctly without stacks and mildly ported would still yield over 200 prop , closed chest without spinning it to pieces. As far as PH weight on its own, very reasonable.
    Last edited by FMP; 12-19-2020 at 04:05 PM.

  26. Likes mrcrsr liked this post
Page 5 of 9 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Who's hitting the gym??(weightloss)
    By Mastercraft241 in forum The Scream And Fly Lounge
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 10-03-2008, 08:12 PM
  2. Hitting the limit
    By HighVelocity in forum Props, Setup, and Rigging
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-03-2005, 12:22 PM
  3. hitting the rev. limiter still
    By joey jamz in forum Technical Discussion
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 09-22-2004, 06:58 PM
  4. have to keep hitting refresh...
    By Talon2.5 in forum General Boating Discussion
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 04-05-2002, 10:42 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Aeromarine Research