User Tag List

Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Northern Cal
    Posts
    198
    Thanks (Given)
    1
    Thanks (Received)
    20
    Likes (Given)
    8
    Likes (Received)
    41
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Question about intake /exhaust air flow capacity versus power output of engine

    I am a novice on this subject but was wondering about this the other day .
    If the CFM of air flow thru and engine combined with the fuel delivery curve is responsible for just how much power is possible a limiting factor would be anything that is responsible for the greatest restriction against the air flow thru the engine . Would it be typical to have all of the intake and exhaust components equally matched for flow capacity so there are no bottle necks in air /exhaust flow through the engine ?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Missouri
    Posts
    1,212
    Thanks (Given)
    2
    Thanks (Received)
    66
    Likes (Given)
    12
    Likes (Received)
    83
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Piston velocity is one limiter. The closer to supersonic speed the greater the force to accelerate it faster and if it goes supersonic and survives then 4 times the force is needed to maintain or accelerate even more.

    Exhaust is typically 80% of intake. That has to do with momentum and other physics. And some chemistry that exhaust left aids in power.

    Proper control of the burn rate through ignition advance also plays a part. On some engines you can gain 5 hp on a dyno per degree.

    But yes generally more air more fuel more power.

  3. Thanks One Oldman thanked for this post
  4. #3
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Livingston, Louisiana
    Posts
    2,191
    Thanks (Given)
    76
    Thanks (Received)
    273
    Likes (Given)
    569
    Likes (Received)
    972
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    You are correct in the fact that the ability of the exaust to transfer the spent gases equally in proportion to the ability of the intake to deliver the air fuel mixture. But it’s not in a 1-1 ratio, the exhaust is generally smaller but can still transfer all the spent gases. The reason for this is mainly the pressure differential between cylinder pressure and atmospheric pressure during the exhaust stroke and intake strokes. The greater differential of pressures on the exhaust stroke cause the velocity of exchange to be much greater, allowing the exhaust to adequately scavange the spent gases using a smaller area than the intake. It’s a littke more involved than this, but for simplicity gets the idea across. But yes, you need to try and keep the ratio between the intake tract and exhaust tract in correct proportion to make as much power as possible.

  5. Thanks One Oldman thanked for this post
    Likes powerabout liked this post
  6. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Northern Cal
    Posts
    198
    Thanks (Given)
    1
    Thanks (Received)
    20
    Likes (Given)
    8
    Likes (Received)
    41
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Motv18 View Post
    Piston velocity is one limiter. The closer to supersonic speed the greater the force to accelerate it faster and if it goes supersonic and survives then 4 times the force is needed to maintain or accelerate even more.

    Exhaust is typically 80% of intake. That has to do with momentum and other physics. And some chemistry that exhaust left aids in power.

    Proper control of the burn rate through ignition advance also plays a part. On some engines you can gain 5 hp on a dyno per degree.

    But yes generally more air more fuel more power.
    Thanks for the responses guys that is some good info...

Similar Threads

  1. Rebuilt new engine.. Power question.. help!!
    By mercury01 in forum Technical Discussion
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 06-11-2015, 11:15 PM
  2. Mercury Tech: Exhaust port inside the engine..question.
    By dompie99 in forum Technical Discussion
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-25-2013, 09:30 AM
  3. Bravo 1 versus TRS, which will handle more power
    By Faster-Boat in forum Technical Discussion
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 06-06-2011, 11:46 AM
  4. Brucato SVS Versus MAD EFI intake 3.0L
    By Double Rigged in forum Technical Discussion
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 01-20-2006, 04:42 PM
  5. Mercury L6 model power output question
    By Pete Keppler in forum Technical Discussion
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 12-06-2001, 12:58 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •