User Tag List

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 51
  1. #31
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Albany, NY
    Posts
    92
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    7
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    31
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I typically set my stingers up so I change ID with an adjustable valve bolt assembly. In Testing I use this to maximize my head fuel pipe combo. I adjust my heads by angle to the piston top.. I blend my fuel and test specific gravity all in the name of creating max HP in the shortest amount of time. I've been able to make more power on the pump that doesn't show up in testing. I have thousands of runs with test data to substantiate this. I don't do it anymore though

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Albany, NY
    Posts
    92
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    7
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    31
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    .. so now I have to get aggressive trying to get my fricken powerhead off. kickin twice didn't do it

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Ontario
    Posts
    8,124
    Thanks (Given)
    205
    Thanks (Received)
    324
    Likes (Given)
    1938
    Likes (Received)
    2015
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Oh that was you! LOL Those sleds must make some good power with all that compression.

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Albany, NY
    Posts
    92
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    7
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    31
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I've ran as high as 17.8 corrected but slowed down. The difference was made in the head fuel pipe combo and rear transfer the rest is typical stuff.

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Albany, NY
    Posts
    92
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    7
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    31
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'm actually going trail riding this year how about that!! just turn the key and go

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Mass
    Posts
    450
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    16
    Likes (Given)
    1
    Likes (Received)
    39
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I too wish brp would make a v6 clone of their sled motor architecture. The problem becomes the bore center distance. Inorder too build a v6 with non twisted transfer ports like a sled motor you need at least a 5 inch bore center distance. The previous generation rotax sled engine had right about 5 inch bore center distance with individual cylinders. The new rotax brp mono cylinder engine is less i think. Bigger bores with good transfer port shape requires more bore center distance. And of course the sled engines have tuned pipes which greatly increase top end power at the expense of low end power. Boat engines need all the low end power. Still with exhaust power valves a sled engine architecture inspired outboard would be bad ass.

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    MIAMI FLORIDA
    Posts
    2,290
    Thanks (Given)
    63
    Thanks (Received)
    124
    Likes (Given)
    360
    Likes (Received)
    759
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    There are ways around the problems , a flat four or six would work fine , two tripples geared together like yami and suzuki did with counter rotating cranks on the bikes. were talking race stuff not a pontoon slug... also everyone's so worried about the torque were not all drag racing. Think of how light the is thing would be with a merc #6 tiny mid all together it wouldn't weigh crap.. on a light f1 boat would be bad ass ..

  8. #38
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Ontario
    Posts
    8,124
    Thanks (Given)
    205
    Thanks (Received)
    324
    Likes (Given)
    1938
    Likes (Received)
    2015
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    L5:d

  9. #39
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Singapore/Melbourne/Italy
    Posts
    9,381
    Thanks (Given)
    1081
    Thanks (Received)
    421
    Likes (Given)
    4796
    Likes (Received)
    2207
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    boosted 3cyl should do it

  10. Thanks John800 thanked for this post
    Likes John800 liked this post
  11. #40
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Ontario
    Posts
    8,124
    Thanks (Given)
    205
    Thanks (Received)
    324
    Likes (Given)
    1938
    Likes (Received)
    2015
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Nothing smoother than a 5. Triple has over 3 times the unbalanced moment.

  12. #41
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Albany, NY
    Posts
    92
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    7
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    31
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Flat 4 cyl fired at 180 might do it. 2 800's coupled. Done it with 440s both 90 and 180 .. lil shot of NOS would get you over the hump

  13. #42
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Ontario
    Posts
    8,124
    Thanks (Given)
    205
    Thanks (Received)
    324
    Likes (Given)
    1938
    Likes (Received)
    2015
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Just love the L5. lol

  14. #43
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Location
    Mn
    Posts
    41
    Thanks (Given)
    19
    Thanks (Received)
    2
    Likes (Given)
    7
    Likes (Received)
    8
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Make it an I/O sterndrive and have room for the tuner and a cvt. I cant beleive nobody has done that! What could possibly go wrong?

  15. Likes Instigator liked this post
  16. #44
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    MIAMI FLORIDA
    Posts
    2,290
    Thanks (Given)
    63
    Thanks (Received)
    124
    Likes (Given)
    360
    Likes (Received)
    759
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Ok I give I will take the 5 cylinder etec 400Hp version where do I write the check. LOL...what s up with 5 cyls is there some other majic to the tuning...5X72 does equal perfect 360 no overlap... Chrysler comes to mind..Dave

  17. #45
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Ontario
    Posts
    8,124
    Thanks (Given)
    205
    Thanks (Received)
    324
    Likes (Given)
    1938
    Likes (Received)
    2015
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Those big hp# are with a crazy pipe and expansion chamber. Yup two stroke 15234 for lowest primary moment but needs tuned pair ex tuning for decent power. It would do a good HP but not 400 without pipes??? Once was Chryco, USMarine , Merc .No Cheques , strictly cash.

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. BRC / Rotax /Johnson outboard ?
    By theoldwizard in forum Four Stroke and Direct Injected Two Stroke Engines
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 08-14-2022, 04:50 PM
  2. Rotax power
    By ROLF in forum Technical Discussion
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 03-03-2010, 10:16 AM
  3. Pair of 430HP Rotax engines in 22' SeaDont??
    By xr1million in forum Jet Boats, V-Drives and Stern Drives
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 09-29-2008, 08:57 PM
  4. Rotax motors
    By ROLF in forum Technical Discussion
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 10-15-2007, 11:53 AM
  5. Where to set the rotary valve on a rotax 718ccc
    By berg969 in forum Technical Discussion
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 04-27-2005, 11:12 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Nizpro Horizontal