User Tag List

  1. #6661
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    38,646
    Thanks (Given)
    78
    Thanks (Received)
    1763
    Likes (Given)
    384
    Likes (Received)
    20372
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

  2. #6662
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    South Florida
    Posts
    2,389
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    170
    Likes (Given)
    1
    Likes (Received)
    595
    Mentioned
    13 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Does this motor have an exhaust tuner in it? The old 44in Mercurys before the tuners were added were rated at 45 hp powerhead. My dad and I added a tuner to an older 44in motor and it did make a measurable difference. Doesn't look like enough room in the mid on this motor for a traditional 5o hp tuner?QUOTE=FUJIMO;2971137][/QUOTE]

  3. #6663
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Annapolis, MD ragboat capital of the world
    Posts
    11,463
    Thanks (Given)
    594
    Thanks (Received)
    168
    Likes (Given)
    2442
    Likes (Received)
    450
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)
    I don't think they have a tuner; but they were built for sameness, not for extra speed.

  4. #6664
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    South Florida
    Posts
    2,389
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    170
    Likes (Given)
    1
    Likes (Received)
    595
    Mentioned
    13 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    When I was just starting out in OPC racing one of the E class top runners was Herb Reeves. Herb put together a rig consisting of two 44in powerheads on D stock mids with Quicksilver lower units on a 13' Raveau. This motor reminds me of that rig. It was something to see running.

  5. #6665
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    1,741
    Thanks (Given)
    17
    Thanks (Received)
    179
    Likes (Given)
    86
    Likes (Received)
    778
    Mentioned
    45 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Kneeler Moli?

    Quote Originally Posted by FUJIMO View Post
    Is boat #34 a Molinari running "topless" (no cowl) as a kneeler / laydown with a TII on the back? How did the guy work power trim if he was laying down (foot buttons?). Must have been a lot of work to "set" the boat in the turns. Kneeling or laydown vs seated position, where did the fuel tank end up going? I've never seen a TII "kneeler" before, how did it do?

  6. #6666
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Singapore/Melbourne/Italy
    Posts
    9,326
    Thanks (Given)
    1058
    Thanks (Received)
    412
    Likes (Given)
    4720
    Likes (Received)
    2170
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by 2us70 View Post
    Does this motor have an exhaust tuner in it? The old 44in Mercurys before the tuners were added were rated at 45 hp powerhead. My dad and I added a tuner to an older 44in motor and it did make a measurable difference. Doesn't look like enough room in the mid on this motor for a traditional 5o hp tuner?QUOTE=FUJIMO;2971137]
    [/QUOTE]
    shame they werent competitive with the OMC, could have ended up with some cool multi brand racing

  7. #6667
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    38,646
    Thanks (Given)
    78
    Thanks (Received)
    1763
    Likes (Given)
    384
    Likes (Received)
    20372
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    ...Go Boldly...With Mercury Racing - https://youtu.be/U36SGQSsOoA

  8. #6668
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Annapolis, MD ragboat capital of the world
    Posts
    11,463
    Thanks (Given)
    594
    Thanks (Received)
    168
    Likes (Given)
    2442
    Likes (Received)
    450
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)
    shame they werent competitive with the OMC, could have ended up with some cool multi brand racing
    They weren't intended to be. One was a Stock Division motor, the other was an OPC Division motor. In the Mod Division where both were allowed, the taller, lower displacement OMC 45ss was at a distinct disadvantage. They were tried for a few years, but it was soon obvious the Merc's had the advantage.

  9. #6669
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    South Florida
    Posts
    2,389
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    170
    Likes (Given)
    1
    Likes (Received)
    595
    Mentioned
    13 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The 44s were reclassified into D class in both OPC and Stock Outboard. In OPC they became just about the only SD motor but with a standard mid and lower unit. I raced this class for two years in the mid 1970s. I have never even seen one of these 44XS motors in person.
    shame they werent competitive with the OMC, could have ended up with some cool multi brand racing[/QUOTE]

  10. #6670
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Singapore/Melbourne/Italy
    Posts
    9,326
    Thanks (Given)
    1058
    Thanks (Received)
    412
    Likes (Given)
    4720
    Likes (Received)
    2170
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Mark75H View Post
    They weren't intended to be. One was a Stock Division motor, the other was an OPC Division motor. In the Mod Division where both were allowed, the taller, lower displacement OMC 45ss was at a distinct disadvantage. They were tried for a few years, but it was soon obvious the Merc's had the advantage.
    We are talking 44xs Versus sst45 the 45 meaning cubic inches
    It was on hydros that the omc was designed for
    So the stock 44xs is over 70hp?
    Merc was a 50hp xflow stock omc was 60hp looper stock
    Last edited by powerabout; 07-17-2017 at 12:14 AM.

  11. #6671
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Puget Sound, WA
    Posts
    19,024
    Thanks (Given)
    47
    Thanks (Received)
    435
    Likes (Given)
    1191
    Likes (Received)
    7463
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Creekrat_Fliver_X-316x163.jpg 
Views:	425 
Size:	12.7 KB 
ID:	380832

  12. #6672
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Puget Sound, WA
    Posts
    19,024
    Thanks (Given)
    47
    Thanks (Received)
    435
    Likes (Given)
    1191
    Likes (Received)
    7463
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Here ya go Sam!
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	SAM_2030.jpg 
Views:	452 
Size:	199.5 KB 
ID:	380833

  13. #6673
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    East Galesburg, IL
    Posts
    508
    Thanks (Given)
    5
    Thanks (Received)
    101
    Likes (Given)
    8
    Likes (Received)
    208
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by powerabout View Post
    We are talking 44xs Versus sst45 the 45 meaning cubic inches
    It was on hydros that the omc was designed for
    So the stock 44xs is over 70hp?
    Merc was a 50hp xflow stock omc was 60hp looper stock
    Wrong Sam. The SST 45 is a 44.9 c.i. Motor & 2 cylinders lower c.g. Then the Merc 44 c.i. 4 cylinder. Yes it was tried & should have exceeded with continued effort. Remember it's loop scavenged whereas the 44 Merc is cross flow. I doubt if any version of a modified 44 Merc could reach 70 hp, but pretty sure a stock 45 pulls 60 plus then if decent expansion chambers were developed could possibly get 70 how

  14. #6674
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Annapolis, MD ragboat capital of the world
    Posts
    11,463
    Thanks (Given)
    594
    Thanks (Received)
    168
    Likes (Given)
    2442
    Likes (Received)
    450
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)
    The OMC twin powerhead is shorter, but the mid is taller.

    People tried them in Mod and the lower powered Merc with more mid range consistently won. Its not who's fastest, its who's "firstest"

    One motor builder did build a OMC twin with expansion chamber and it did very well in the few races he took it to.

    I agree, I do not think a modified 44 Merc has the potential to make 70hp.

  15. #6675
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    South Florida
    Posts
    2,389
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    170
    Likes (Given)
    1
    Likes (Received)
    595
    Mentioned
    13 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The 44 in Mercury just couldn't flow enough air to make a lot more than 50 hp. I heard rumors of a rotary valve conversion to an inline Mercury which might have helped but the inspectors would probably have noticed that one.

  16. Likes Mark75H liked this post
Page 445 of 1890 FirstFirst ... 345 395 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 495 545 945 1445 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Mercury racing line-up thru the years
    By triplestroker in forum Outboard and Racing History
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 05-08-2014, 04:31 PM
  2. What years were 2.4 & 2.5 blocks built by Mercury?
    By Knothead in forum Technical Discussion
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: 06-18-2013, 06:22 PM
  3. 1976 Mercury 65 hp first start in 12 years
    By DaveS8984 in forum Technical Discussion
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 07-26-2011, 06:07 PM
  4. Looking for an old Mercury commercial, about 10-11 years old
    By Ron V in forum General Boating Discussion
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-27-2006, 08:31 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Chris Carson's Marine