User Tag List

Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 38

Thread: Talking Squish

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Ludington michigan,on the shore
    Posts
    3,084
    Thanks (Given)
    72
    Thanks (Received)
    181
    Likes (Given)
    128
    Likes (Received)
    832
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Talking Squish

    Putting a drag together for the old stream.Its got factory 21cc heads,at the price of race gas,the 21s gotta go on the shelf.I have a cherry pair of 18787-C4 with 2 1/8" top hat chambers.My plan is to convert them To orings, this will nesatate cutting a squish recess of around .035 my question is how do Mercs respond to a taper squish band.I was thinking of around a two degree angle,And a slight radius at the pocket.Im wondering if the increase resulting from the angle cut is a bad thing.The squish clearance near the pocket would be .050 or more.When done I'm looking for 175/180 psi

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    minocqua, wis
    Posts
    3,555
    Thanks (Given)
    4
    Thanks (Received)
    79
    Likes (Given)
    306
    Likes (Received)
    504
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    am having mine done his winter 2 degree angle and dome work ,the roundy round F1 motors have angle squish ,so do many cycle engines ,i left you a p.m with some info .j

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    beaumont, tx
    Posts
    1,969
    Thanks (Given)
    135
    Thanks (Received)
    76
    Likes (Given)
    1000
    Likes (Received)
    605
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    eli ....didnt you have a thread on this not long ago??
    81' HYDROSTREAM VECTOR / slightly Modified 200
    before and after:http://www.screamandfly.com/showthre...inished!/page3

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    minocqua, wis
    Posts
    3,555
    Thanks (Given)
    4
    Thanks (Received)
    79
    Likes (Given)
    306
    Likes (Received)
    504
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    yes

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Oak Hill Fl.
    Posts
    807
    Thanks (Given)
    28
    Thanks (Received)
    62
    Likes (Given)
    127
    Likes (Received)
    506
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    leave the edge at the chamber sharp. It will help swirl the gases in the chamber. I have found 3 deg squash angle worked the beset on the testing I have done on small 2 stroke eng.
    Also the MSV(maximum squash velocity)is important to help swirl the gasses in the chamber.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Ludington michigan,on the shore
    Posts
    3,084
    Thanks (Given)
    72
    Thanks (Received)
    181
    Likes (Given)
    128
    Likes (Received)
    832
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)
    I am a little concerned of a sharp edge lighting off the charge.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Oak Hill Fl.
    Posts
    807
    Thanks (Given)
    28
    Thanks (Received)
    62
    Likes (Given)
    127
    Likes (Received)
    506
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by outasite View Post
    I am a little concerned of a sharp edge lighting off the charge.
    The testing I have done was on small Nitro engs. thy are very prone to detonation. the 3 deg angle dose not make a large small space to trap the fuel to detonate. the sharp edges will not create a hot spot as the fuel is washing over it on its way to the chamber.
    The squash velocity helps this also as it forces fuel over the edge at a faster speed.
    There are calculators on the web to find out what the squash velocity is at a certain RPM.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Ludington michigan,on the shore
    Posts
    3,084
    Thanks (Given)
    72
    Thanks (Received)
    181
    Likes (Given)
    128
    Likes (Received)
    832
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)
    Bobbie,these heads are 33cc uncut.My plan is to check both,and make a very light cut to clean up and make equal.Then cut the oring groove,then a .035 pocket cut for a squish,then a two degree angle to the chamber,and finish off with a slight radius around the chamber.hopeing to end up with an oring head equal to a 28-30 cc gasket style head.Click image for larger version. 

Name:	image.jpg 
Views:	49 
Size:	408.5 KB 
ID:	362947Click image for larger version. 

Name:	image.jpg 
Views:	79 
Size:	336.4 KB 
ID:	362948
    Last edited by outasite; 12-19-2016 at 07:52 PM.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    NE Louisiana
    Posts
    23,503
    Thanks (Given)
    290
    Thanks (Received)
    1203
    Likes (Given)
    18390
    Likes (Received)
    14429
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    RC engines on nitro are totally different from a 2.5 on pump gas. The physics between the two is not even a comparison..... plus the fuel, etc, etc. I think a bevel or a radius would be best.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    Hickory NC
    Posts
    5,625
    Thanks (Given)
    21
    Thanks (Received)
    270
    Likes (Given)
    219
    Likes (Received)
    524
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    What I found on OMC engines on the dyno which was later confirmed by one of the race group. 2 Degree's works best for power with a slight radius, however a sharp edge is less detonation prone.

  11. Likes Onetime liked this post
  12. #11
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Albany, NY
    Posts
    92
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    7
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    31
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I've done extensive testing in the field and on the dyno with regards to this topic. The truth of the matter is that head, pipe, fuel combo is just that.. a combo. For this conversation 2 or 3 degrees is safe and leave it sharp. In outboards I found the biggest problem is the exhaust is limiting

  13. Likes Freddie Webb liked this post
  14. #12
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Oak Hill Fl.
    Posts
    807
    Thanks (Given)
    28
    Thanks (Received)
    62
    Likes (Given)
    127
    Likes (Received)
    506
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    What % of the bore is the squash band?

  15. #13
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Ludington michigan,on the shore
    Posts
    3,084
    Thanks (Given)
    72
    Thanks (Received)
    181
    Likes (Given)
    128
    Likes (Received)
    832
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)
    Bore 3.500 dome 2.125 squish .750x2=1.500 puts it in the 40/45% of bore. Actually the squish is closer to .725 so around 40%
    Last edited by outasite; 12-20-2016 at 08:31 PM.

  16. #14
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Lake Havasu City AZ
    Posts
    512
    Thanks (Given)
    1
    Thanks (Received)
    34
    Likes (Given)
    7
    Likes (Received)
    92
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Squish area is directly related to RPM, 50% would be a 6000 rpm engine 40% for a 10,000 rpm engine. This information came from a factory MX Yamaha engineer. He also suggested a radius leading into the dome. Like Al said the radius makes more power but it is easier to have detonation.

  17. #15
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Oak Hill Fl.
    Posts
    807
    Thanks (Given)
    28
    Thanks (Received)
    62
    Likes (Given)
    127
    Likes (Received)
    506
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The reason the % makes a difference is the MSV changes with RPM. The less % of area reduces the MSV.
    The MSV increases with RPM. So a smaller % keeps it with in range at higher RPMS
    MSV is what it is all about....................................
    This changes with angle and % of the squash band and chamber cc. in conjunction with RPM.
    MSV is the constant when designing a head. All adjustments should revolve around this for tuning the chambers.
    Last edited by dwilfong; 12-20-2016 at 09:31 PM.

  18. Likes Freddie Webb liked this post
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Another squish question.
    By Mr. Demeanor in forum Technical Discussion
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 10-15-2014, 05:02 PM
  2. squish/piston wash
    By texasvector in forum Technical Discussion
    Replies: 44
    Last Post: 10-05-2014, 04:15 AM
  3. squish angle help please
    By nz dave in forum Technical Discussion
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 05-24-2009, 09:59 AM
  4. Engine builder? squish?
    By Jason Johnson in forum Technical Discussion
    Replies: 33
    Last Post: 03-08-2008, 02:08 PM
  5. Better squish?
    By Ryan140 in forum Technical Discussion
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: 03-31-2003, 06:53 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Nizpro Horizontal