User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 191

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Loch Erin, Irish Hills Area, SE Michigan
    Posts
    14,804
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    15
    Likes (Given)
    6
    Likes (Received)
    49
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The Canadian product is maltier-tasting, the flavor is smother and more intense. The flakes are usually thinner and more jagged-shaped too, with less of the tiny air pockets in the flakes. The frosting usually is glossy-looking. Hard to eat just one bowl.

    The Battle Creek product is bland. Tastes like corn and sugar (mostly IS anyway), but more of a gritty, boring plain-jane flavor. The flakes are more rounded, usually thicker with more air bubbles in the flakes, and a satin-texture frosting. Not nearly as addictive as the Canuck flakes.

    Of the two Canuck lines, (00735 and 04132), the 00735 has a better "smell inside the bag" aroma, the 04132 flakes have more of the "old socks" aroma, but they both taste the same.

    Additionally, there are other inconsistencies in the product. Thickness or hardness of the flakes, amount of frosting, etc. Quality control isn't very strict. I still love my Frosted Flakes though, as long as I can still find the Canadian ones.

    In the photo, they almost look the same, other than the slight color and shape difference.
    Battle Creek 00734 product on the left, . . . . . . . . . . . . . Canada 04132 product on the right.

    By hydro_pyro at 2007-08-14
    Last edited by pyro; 08-14-2007 at 11:52 PM.
    '89 Hydrostream Vegas XT, '90 Merc 2.4 Bridgeport PCU EFI
    My YouTube videos________My Flickr photo gallery
    http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1706097519

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •