User Tag List
Thanks: 0
Likes: 0
Results 1 to 9 of 9
Thread: 20000 RPM, 2.4 litre, 780hp
-
08-17-2005, 10:22 PM #15000 RPM
- Join Date
- Sep 2003
- Location
- Avon, MN
- Posts
- 350
- Thanks (Given)
- 0
- Thanks (Received)
- 0
- Likes (Given)
- 0
- Likes (Received)
- 1
- Mentioned
- 0 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
20000 RPM, 2.4 litre, 780hp
For those of you who follow or want to see the latest 2.4 litre V-8 Formula 1 engine run on the dyno at 20000+ rpm, log on to www.cosworth.com and click on the V-8 dyno video. It's quite interesting to say the least. They are at just under 800hp and the engine has been running for only a few months so far. Rule changes went from 3 litre V-10's turning 19000 rpm to the 2.4 litre V-8's (for the 2006 season)to slow the developement of power. Rumor has it that Honda will break 1000hp by the Chinese GP in October with the last V-10's. Cosworth expects to be at or near 21000 rpm by years end.
Randy
-
08-18-2005, 03:21 AM #2
Daaaamn, that's wild! You figured out how to attach a sportmaster to one of those yet randy?
-
08-18-2005, 07:31 PM #3Screaming And Flying!
- Join Date
- Sep 2003
- Location
- shreveport,la
- Posts
- 5,497
- Thanks (Given)
- 4
- Thanks (Received)
- 18
- Likes (Given)
- 24
- Likes (Received)
- 212
- Mentioned
- 1 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
That's why Nascar bores me.... Only GOD know's more about internal combustion and airflow than Formula 1...
Kevin Kiser
-
08-21-2005, 09:20 AM #4
Unreal
Sounds like my GPI 2.5!
Skydog2011 DCB F26
2017 300 XS DBR
-
08-21-2005, 09:36 AM #5Screaming And Flying!
- Join Date
- Sep 2003
- Location
- shreveport,la
- Posts
- 5,497
- Thanks (Given)
- 4
- Thanks (Received)
- 18
- Likes (Given)
- 24
- Likes (Received)
- 212
- Mentioned
- 1 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
Engineering, precision, all R&D - NO BS
At the end of the video when it IDLES down to 9000 rpm, it sounds like it just loafing on a Sunday drive...
Kevin Kiser
-
08-22-2005, 09:07 AM #6Originally Posted by Ted StrykerChris Lacey <'((><
22' Redline SOB
Merc 225 3.0l
1995 Harley Davidson Road King
-
08-22-2005, 05:48 PM #7Screaming And Flying!
- Join Date
- Sep 2003
- Location
- shreveport,la
- Posts
- 5,497
- Thanks (Given)
- 4
- Thanks (Received)
- 18
- Likes (Given)
- 24
- Likes (Received)
- 212
- Mentioned
- 1 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
That Voo Doo can also be reffered to as ingenuity...
Last edited by Ted Stryker; 08-22-2005 at 09:11 PM.
Kevin Kiser
-
08-22-2005, 07:09 PM #8
Very cool Randy
I checked it out the other day when you posted this and forgot to reply. Now tell me why Merc didn't go with a 2 speed tranny and a lighter powerhead when they went to 4 stroke . Can't be any more complicated or expensive then a blower. Very cool link.
-
08-29-2005, 06:58 PM #9Team Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2001
- Location
- Lake Coochiching, Ontario
- Posts
- 7,768
- Thanks (Given)
- 23
- Thanks (Received)
- 276
- Likes (Given)
- 487
- Likes (Received)
- 1590
- Mentioned
- 6 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
Those NASCAR guys try to conceal their technology, but they are much more sophisticated than they look. I was in awe when I toured some of their facilities and met some of them.
But a front running F1 team costs over $300 million, enough to pay for what, 20 NASCAR rides?
So sure, more money in F1 is spent on engineering.
Any bets on when Toyota starts running for the cup? A fraction of their F1 budget would be big bucks on a cup team.
Road and Track recently noted that a NASCAR engine's piston speed at 8000 is higher than a F1's at 18000 (rough numbers). Someone starting fresh without the years of development, and with no engine to benchmark, would take a long time and spend big money to make a big V8 turn 8000 rpm for hours.Last edited by David; 08-29-2005 at 07:04 PM. Reason: forgot something