User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    Scottsboro Alabama
    Posts
    706
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    6
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    220 laser ecu on a 2.5

    I have seen on here where some people have ran a 220 ecu on a 200 2.5. Will that ecu be rich enough for a very mild 2.5. Will the map sensor compensate enough. It does when people bolt the Brucatto intakes on so it seems like it could handle a 2.5's needs. Or would it be just too lean?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    ILLINOIS
    Posts
    3,901
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Cool Should work fine

    The 220 never really made much more then a good 200 from what we have seen. But 200hp worth of fuel is 200hp worth of fuel at the top. On the bottom it may run a bit leaner on the 2.5 but not that much. That should be a good combo. The TPI only works up til 3000 rpm or so and that may need a bit of adjusting for the 2.5 bottom end. The MAP tells the ECU the engine load and should be roughly the same between the 2 motors. You can compensate the vacuum a bit by moving around your timing. You probably have a soft limiter on that box too so it should rev up nice.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    HUDSON, FLORIDA
    Posts
    1,530
    Thanks (Given)
    433
    Thanks (Received)
    64
    Likes (Given)
    435
    Likes (Received)
    452
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    how are these old posts coming up on top?????
    Last edited by KIRCHNER; 08-17-2019 at 03:53 PM.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Location
    Ashland city tn
    Posts
    4,774
    Thanks (Given)
    226
    Thanks (Received)
    353
    Likes (Given)
    1177
    Likes (Received)
    1115
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Well I do believe the 2.4 200 had much more demand for fuel ,being piston ported compared to 2.5 behind liner porting , I think it would be rich enough to give it a shot, just install a gud reading plug

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Location
    Ashland city tn
    Posts
    4,774
    Thanks (Given)
    226
    Thanks (Received)
    353
    Likes (Given)
    1177
    Likes (Received)
    1115
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by KIRCHNER View Post
    how are these old posts coming up on top?????
    Not real sure but I fell rite into this one without lookin

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Lufkin, Texas
    Posts
    2,642
    Thanks (Given)
    301
    Thanks (Received)
    275
    Likes (Given)
    1788
    Likes (Received)
    1265
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Good info, glad I saw it! I like disguising 2.5's as 2.4's...

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Frank Mole Transport