User Tag List

Results 1 to 14 of 14
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Formerly Central WI/LOTO Currently PHX AZ
    Posts
    490
    Thanks (Given)
    61
    Thanks (Received)
    82
    Likes (Given)
    1247
    Likes (Received)
    423
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Interesting Perspective on Design and Construction of Mercury’s $11M NVH Facility

    https://www.plantengineering.com/art...ting-facility/

    Kind of a long read, but interesting designs for overcoming ground vibration and traffic sound noise levels.

    Obviously they’re putting it to good use…

    If you’ve ever been in one of the hemi-anechoic chambers, they are so quiet, you can hear yourself think!

    To give you an idea, they were targeting a free state of 21 dB, and achieved 16 dB. That’s quiet!

    The other thing that amazes me is the 42 springs suspending the 550,770 lbs of water in the tank but the weight of the concrete tank itself! Neat engineering stuff, especially for a nerd like me.
    A problem is only a problem when viewed as a problem...

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Florida/New York
    Posts
    21,832
    Thanks (Given)
    965
    Thanks (Received)
    1570
    Likes (Given)
    2944
    Likes (Received)
    5551
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)
    It's really incredible how the manufacturing facility needs to be nearly as technologically advanced and innovative as the product themselves. A ton of engineering went into that! I think I should actually post about this on the front page. It's a really unique perspective into what goes into modern production that we rarely see. I appreciate you posting it!


    Facebook | YouTube | Vintage Outboard Catalogs
    Photo prints available of your boat - click here


  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    1,497
    Thanks (Given)
    13
    Thanks (Received)
    130
    Likes (Given)
    70
    Likes (Received)
    627
    Mentioned
    35 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Mercury's R&D Path

    Quote Originally Posted by HydroSkreamin View Post
    https://www.plantengineering.com/art...ting-facility/

    Kind of a long read, but interesting designs for overcoming ground vibration and traffic sound noise levels.

    Obviously they’re putting it to good use…

    If you’ve ever been in one of the hemi-anechoic chambers, they are so quiet, you can hear yourself think!

    To give you an idea, they were targeting a free state of 21 dB, and achieved 16 dB. That’s quiet!

    The other thing that amazes me is the 42 springs suspending the 550,770 lbs of water in the tank but the weight of the concrete tank itself! Neat engineering stuff, especially for a nerd like me.
    You have to admit it that Mercury has left everybody far behind in the R&D department. In the last 5+ years, they have developed the Verado, purpose designed 4 stroke V6, V8 and V12 programs and now the V10. Other than repower, I think I/O production has reached the end of the road. $11M is pocket change in today's money. When you think in terms inflation and relative cost of homes, cars, etc I think I got my new V8 ProXS for a song. I was surprised to see the V10 was fully steerable not like the V12.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    37,836
    Thanks (Given)
    64
    Thanks (Received)
    1667
    Likes (Given)
    337
    Likes (Received)
    19218
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by WaterZebra View Post
    ...I was surprised to see the V10 was fully steerable not like the V12.
    ...completely electric as well. no longer hydraulic...

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    The great corn desert of Iowa
    Posts
    298
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    23
    Likes (Given)
    41
    Likes (Received)
    200
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I don’t know if the I/O is dead. At least for your average fresh water boater (not talking center consoles or off shore). I don’t think most of them care either way and just want a boat with a nice interior. What’s the cost difference between a complete I/O 350 mag from engine to drive and a 300 hp outboard? Around $5,000 more for the outboard? Personally I would want the outboard but your average guy would rather the the money.
    1971 Sidewinder 14 SS w Johnson 90 v-4
    1959 Texas Maid Falcon w Mercury Mark 35A
    1981 Sylvan Sportster w Johnson 85 v-4
    2006 Harris pontoon with a Yamaha 90
    1969 Sunfish sailboat

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2019
    Location
    MI
    Posts
    233
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    15
    Likes (Given)
    2
    Likes (Received)
    145
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Good to see they have money for that but can't piece together 250 to 300 HP lightweight OB that won't cost 50k, lol.
    2023 Progression 22 w/ 2015 Mercury 300XS. 2018 Kawasaki Ultra LX. 1969 Hustler Wildcat. 1985 Hydrostream Vegas XT. Gone but not forgotten: 1991 POS GW Invader. 1976 Donzi Hornet II. 1994 Formula 232 LS. 2001 Regal 2660. 1990 Formula 206 LS. 1992 Checkmate Pulse 186 w/ 2003 Mercury 200 EFI. Random assortment of jet skis.

  7. Likes doug7488, David - WI liked this post
  8. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Bristol, WI
    Posts
    2,989
    Thanks (Given)
    24
    Thanks (Received)
    104
    Likes (Given)
    770
    Likes (Received)
    604
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Pulse186 View Post
    Good to see they have money for that but can't piece together 250 to 300 HP lightweight OB that won't cost 50k, lol.
    It's funny that when they did offer that, nobody bought it.....So they won't make that mistake again.
    Larry Gempp Jr.

    Proud HydroStream Powertour Member

    Current Ride - 2024 22 Liberator - 450R


  9. Likes wicheckmate, engineermike liked this post
  10. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    801
    Thanks (Given)
    101
    Thanks (Received)
    33
    Likes (Given)
    817
    Likes (Received)
    157
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

  11. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2019
    Location
    MI
    Posts
    233
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    15
    Likes (Given)
    2
    Likes (Received)
    145
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Speed Jr. View Post
    It's funny that when they did offer that, nobody bought it.....So they won't make that mistake again.

    Merc came out with a reasonably priced 4 stroke, lightweight (around 425) 250 to 300 HP, 20" outboard and not one person bought one?
    Last edited by Pulse186; 11-22-2022 at 06:53 PM. Reason: c
    2023 Progression 22 w/ 2015 Mercury 300XS. 2018 Kawasaki Ultra LX. 1969 Hustler Wildcat. 1985 Hydrostream Vegas XT. Gone but not forgotten: 1991 POS GW Invader. 1976 Donzi Hornet II. 1994 Formula 232 LS. 2001 Regal 2660. 1990 Formula 206 LS. 1992 Checkmate Pulse 186 w/ 2003 Mercury 200 EFI. Random assortment of jet skis.

  12. #10
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Bristol, WI
    Posts
    2,989
    Thanks (Given)
    24
    Thanks (Received)
    104
    Likes (Given)
    770
    Likes (Received)
    604
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Pulse186 View Post
    Merc came out with a reasonably priced 4 stroke, lightweight (around 425) 250 to 300 HP, 20" outboard and not one person bought one?
    The 2.5xs/ros. It was the last ditch effort at a lightweight v6 for the weight sensitive crowd. It was not a good seller by any measure. It's what everyone said they needed, which today would be considered a reasonable price......At the time the big heavy pig 300xs was all the weight sensitive crowd complained about, then there were guys who worked on the setup, fell in love with them. Now for 50 lbs more we have a 4.6L V8, with on par pricing of the prior generations, when you take inflation in to account. Now Merc Racing is trying to get more allocations of motors from Merc Marine to keep up with the demand of the R orders. Mercury is building EXACTLY what the consumer is demanding. It's just sad when people complain about something not being offered when they probably wouldn't buy it if it was....Which Merc found out quickly held true. Can't blame them for going where the demand is. After running 2.5s, 3L, 3.3L 3.4L, etc....You couldn't give me one to swap from the 4.6L 300R. I can't wait till the R version of the V10 comes out. We are truly in the heyday of outboard performance. Its buzzing at Merc Racing, which is why they broke ground on the expansion facility. Let's be honest, merc killed it on the timing of the big HP race among the outboard industry. It is beyond me how people criticize the only company that really offers high speed outboard applications. We should all be so lucky that any R motors exist for us to use. My 2c.

    Last edited by Speed Jr.; 11-22-2022 at 08:31 PM.
    Larry Gempp Jr.

    Proud HydroStream Powertour Member

    Current Ride - 2024 22 Liberator - 450R


  13. #11
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Formerly Central WI/LOTO Currently PHX AZ
    Posts
    490
    Thanks (Given)
    61
    Thanks (Received)
    82
    Likes (Given)
    1247
    Likes (Received)
    423
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Speed Jr. View Post
    After running 2.5s, 3L, 3.3L 3.4L, etc....You couldn't give me one to swap from the 4.6L 300R. I can't wait till the R version of the V10 comes out. We are truly in the heyday of outboard performance. Its buzzing at Merc Racing, which is why they broke ground on the expansion facility. Let's be honest, merc killed it on the timing of the big HP race among the outboard industry. It is beyond me how people criticize the only company that really offers high speed outboard applications. We should all be so lucky that any R motors exist for us to use. My 2c.
    Speed Jr, you definitely make some good points. The 200 ROS and 2.5 XS were the last two strokes to attempt to be EPA compliant, and to those that think that’s not a big deal, I’m telling you it is. The 2.5 XS was 2-star compliant, the 200 ROS wasn’t even close. There were 104 units built of the 2.5XS. JPEROG owns 3.8% of the production run…let that sink in…

    Unfortunately for us, the rules have changed since the heyday of lightweight power, and if you want to sell engines in the US, you must comply. The amount of effort that goes into new products that are developed today is mind boggling. Exhaust and noise emissions are much more strict than yesteryear, and to develop a product that meets them, performs well, and is reliable (warranty), all while running on the cheapest fuel available at the pump is criteria very few older engines can live up to.

    So, to get this thread back toward its origins, Speed Jr, how do you find the noise and vibration levels of your 300R compared with what you used to run?
    Last edited by HydroSkreamin; 11-22-2022 at 11:46 PM.
    A problem is only a problem when viewed as a problem...

  14. Likes Speed Jr., starviper10 liked this post
  15. #12
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Formerly Central WI/LOTO Currently PHX AZ
    Posts
    490
    Thanks (Given)
    61
    Thanks (Received)
    82
    Likes (Given)
    1247
    Likes (Received)
    423
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Pulse186 View Post
    Good to see they have money for that but can't piece together 250 to 300 HP lightweight OB that won't cost 50k, lol.
    I’m with you, bud. I’d love a new Corvette for $30k too, but it ain’t happening.

    Economics have drowned our segment of the market. Let’s use one boat manufacturer, Nortech, for example. They build about 400 boats per year, in triple, quad and quint setups. Assuming they’re averaging 4 engines per boat to keep the math simple, that’s 1600 engines to just one manufacturer !

    Do you think 1600 people on this site buy new engines each year? I bought one this year, and it’s the first thing mechanical in my life I’ve ever bought new. Why? It’s what I wanted, and I’m at a point in my life that I can. Does it make sense to buy an engine that costs 2.5-3X what my hull is worth? Probably not. Will I enjoy it? Absolutely! But I understand it’s not for everyone. I know JPEROG, Z06Man, Wildman, Speed Jr, Toffen and a handful of others on this site have purchased new engines over the last year, but I’d wager it’s not 100, and almost definitely not 200.

    At the end of the day, Mercury has realized that to compete in a global market, they need to have world class products, and if they convinced the Brunswick board and stockholders that they could develop engines at 600 HP that are smooth and quiet, my hat’s off to them for working their way through government and business bureaucracy as well as the engineering and construction struggles, all to achieve the lofty goals they set for themselves.

    Let’s hope they continue to utilize their knowledge and resources so that one day they may actually have an opportunity to work on something for our smaller boats. What builder of NEW small boats is knocking on their door? Maybe TUFF can start that wave…
    A problem is only a problem when viewed as a problem...

  16. Likes Speed Jr., 22R, starviper10 liked this post
  17. #13
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Lake Coochiching, Ontario
    Posts
    7,768
    Thanks (Given)
    23
    Thanks (Received)
    276
    Likes (Given)
    487
    Likes (Received)
    1590
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I love Tuff, but they are not building 400 boats per year. Less then 10 actually.

    No question Merc is making progress on noise. I went to watch some of a poker run in the summer. Four 400’s starting on the back of a big cat made less noise then my 200XS ROS starting.

  18. #14
    Join Date
    Nov 2019
    Location
    MI
    Posts
    233
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    15
    Likes (Given)
    2
    Likes (Received)
    145
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by HydroSkreamin View Post
    Economics have drowned our segment of the market.
    I've been in the corporate world for 30 years, Merc is a shareholder driven company so I understand their need to sell $50,000+ outboards.

    The 250XS ros was a 2 stroke, would be nice to see a similar v6 motor in 4 stroke.
    2023 Progression 22 w/ 2015 Mercury 300XS. 2018 Kawasaki Ultra LX. 1969 Hustler Wildcat. 1985 Hydrostream Vegas XT. Gone but not forgotten: 1991 POS GW Invader. 1976 Donzi Hornet II. 1994 Formula 232 LS. 2001 Regal 2660. 1990 Formula 206 LS. 1992 Checkmate Pulse 186 w/ 2003 Mercury 200 EFI. Random assortment of jet skis.

Similar Threads

  1. Outboard Motor Test Tanks: Design & Construction
    By MattGreen in forum Technical Discussion
    Replies: 34
    Last Post: 01-24-2021, 02:50 PM
  2. Interesting Tunnel Design Idea...
    By FUJIMO in forum General Boating Discussion
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 10-05-2020, 02:36 PM
  3. Interesting perspective on SM and how it works on you
    By LakeFever in forum The Scream And Fly Lounge
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-05-2018, 07:47 AM
  4. interesting design
    By Instigator in forum Ebay Listings and Other Internet Listings
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 02-19-2018, 03:47 PM
  5. Outboard transom design and composite construction
    By Matt Gent in forum Fiberglass and Composites Discussion
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 11-04-2004, 09:54 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Frank Mole Transport