User Tag List

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 31

Thread: Bluebird K7

  1. #16
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    1,137
    Thanks (Given)
    4
    Thanks (Received)
    57
    Likes (Given)
    124
    Likes (Received)
    223
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Designs

    The Bluebird was the earliest successful outrigger style hydroplane. He evidently understood that this design would be well suited to the huge power output of the jet engine. The biggest benefit of the outrigger hydro is that it does not trap air under the entire front of the hull like a conventional three point hydro. There have been attempts to use this design in unlimited hydro racing, but even with turbine engines, a prop driven U hydro does not have the power to weight ratio to make it work properly.

    I have no doubt that Don Pinckert, the man who built the first RC outrigger hydroplane, was inspired by the Bluebird. The design is the ultimate RC speed boat because the power to weight (and size) ratio is off the chart.

    But every design has a limit and Campbell pushed Bluebird past it on that day.

    As for Lee Taylor, if you go to YouTube and watch the vids of Hal Needham's Budweiser rocket car driven by Stan Barrett, you see where Taylor got the idea to build his radical boat. His boat used a hydrogen peroxide rocket engine the same as the rocket car. His idea was to have a boat with the same 'footprint' of that tricycle rocket car. But the angle of all three ride surfaces had far too much AOA which was the main contributing factor of why the boat flipped over like it did. The water conditions on Tahoe that day did not help either.
    1970 15' Allison/135 Chrysler stacker
    RC Mod-VP Boats

    IMPBA District 13
    NAMBA District 3

  2. Likes David, rgsauger liked this post
  3. #17
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    N/A
    Posts
    164
    Thanks (Given)
    7
    Thanks (Received)
    7
    Likes (Given)
    13
    Likes (Received)
    48
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Mark Poole ModVP View Post
    ... The biggest benefit of the outrigger hydro is that it does not trap air under the entire front of the hull like a conventional three point hydro...
    Thank you, I missed this part until i looked closer. Academic question; from what i gather the K7 did not have a propeller and is in essence a full in-ground effect design with six pressure ridges, three on each side? Thanks again

    https://www.thingiverse.com/thing:5263550

  4. #18
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Florida Keys
    Posts
    3,042
    Thanks (Given)
    44
    Thanks (Received)
    147
    Likes (Given)
    380
    Likes (Received)
    801
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    None of the record attempt boats we are talking about are propeller driven. Thrust only.


    '95 STV "The Blue Goose"


  5. Likes Instigator liked this post
  6. #19
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Cardington Ohio
    Posts
    19,679
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    20 yrs ago I was in Ken Warbys basement/bar and among videos we watched was the one of of Arfons attempt.

    Ken thought he ran out of fuel.
    This got my attention.
    He also thought there was possible, personal issues at play that he didn’t go into.

    As stated though, these boats are propelled by thrust which I’ll be the first to admit I know nothing of.

    Propeller driven, has effect on lift.

    Thrust driven, once flying, they are 100% aerodynamic controlled/effected w/angle of thrust being the limiting/controlling factor.

    On Arfons, I clearly remember his design.
    It was a stretched out Top Fuel Hydro design. Like, 10’ longer.

    I remember seeing Arfons pre-attempt press on it and saying TFH was already running 230.
    And I was screaming at the TV screen saying, “yeah for the last 100’ of their pass and 3 drivers die every yr trying”, and your going to go 100 mph faster?

    I gave him 0% chance of succeeding.

    Kens take was, under power/thrust, that thrust angle keeps the bow down.
    Run out of fuel/thrust, aerodynamic lift stays the same, mechanical thrust/angle goes to zero and…..

    These guys are the men of men.

    Like the first guys to challenge the world is flat.
    OK, but how do we know?

    I remember Warby bitching about the APBA trying to institute safety rules for their future record attempt and laughing at them.

    No one, I mean no one, knows ANYTHING about going 300 mph in a boat!

    Well, one guy does.
    But the man tells him the rules they’re going to instate?
    I'd rather be competitive w/junk I built in my garage than win w/stuff I bought.


    I refuse to allow common sense to interfere w/my boat buying decisions.


    Checkmate 16' 140 Johnson
    Hydrostream 17' Vector FrankenRude I
    Laser 480 (?) 21' w/GT 200
    Glastron Carlson Conquest w/XP 2.6
    Glastron Carlson CVX 20 w/XP 2.6
    24' Sonic w/twin 250 Johnsons
    24' Sonic w/twin 250 HO Johnsons
    19' STV River Rocket w/FrankenRude II
    Allison XR 2002 w/Frankenrude II
    Hydrostream 18' V-King w/Frankenrude II

  7. Likes mach351, 89LASER, rgsauger, OnPad liked this post
  8. #20
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    801
    Thanks (Given)
    101
    Thanks (Received)
    33
    Likes (Given)
    817
    Likes (Received)
    157
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Instigator View Post
    20 yrs ago I was in Ken Warbys basement/bar and among videos we watched was the one of of Arfons attempt. Kens take was, under power/thrust, that thrust angle keeps the bow down. Run out of fuel/thrust, aerodynamic lift stays the same, mechanical thrust/angle goes to zero and…..
    The dynamic balance of these hulls is ever changing, with changes in aero lift/drag, thrust, hydrodynamic lift/drag, etc. The many force contributors to the dynamic balance all change quickly, particularly as velocity changes quickly too. Propulsion force from propeller vs jet engine is definitely quite different in the respective contribution to dynamic balance. it's difficult to maintain the changes needed to keep the boat in dynamic balance, and once it's just slightly off, the changes come increasingly faster. it's tough to stay on top of, with some designs.
    Last edited by Jimboat; 11-22-2022 at 11:24 AM.

  9. Likes David, Instigator, rgsauger liked this post
  10. #21
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    N/A
    Posts
    164
    Thanks (Given)
    7
    Thanks (Received)
    7
    Likes (Given)
    13
    Likes (Received)
    48
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Real-time pressure differential telemetry is a fantastic opportunity; these are in ground effect craft imo\. The plywood, 60$ jet engine and > 300mph is nothing short of genius, passion and fortitude. I'm not sure I would have enough courage to even start it up; let alone push the throttle to the wall. What these folks accomplished is legendary.

  11. Likes Brad Zastrow, rgsauger liked this post
  12. #22
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Southern California
    Posts
    3,555
    Thanks (Given)
    177
    Thanks (Received)
    470
    Likes (Given)
    3399
    Likes (Received)
    2318
    Mentioned
    29 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Mark Poole ModVP View Post
    The Bluebird was the earliest successful outrigger style hydroplane.
    He evidently understood that this design would be well suited to the huge power output of the jet engine. The biggest benefit of the outrigger hydro is that it does not trap air under the entire front of the hull like a conventional three point hydro. There have been attempts to use this design in unlimited hydro racing, but even with turbine engines, a prop driven U hydro does not have the power to weight ratio to make it work properly.
    Top Fuel Drag Boats have been using outriggers (safely with stability) in the bow for years. Their prop driven, but surely the aerodynamics are in play, similar to the record attempt boats like Bluebird and Lee Taylor's boat.







  13. Likes rgsauger liked this post
  14. #23
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Southern California
    Posts
    3,555
    Thanks (Given)
    177
    Thanks (Received)
    470
    Likes (Given)
    3399
    Likes (Received)
    2318
    Mentioned
    29 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

  15. #24
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Southern California
    Posts
    3,555
    Thanks (Given)
    177
    Thanks (Received)
    470
    Likes (Given)
    3399
    Likes (Received)
    2318
    Mentioned
    29 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Outriggers in the bow saved his bacon.

    If the Outriggers were in the back, then surely his needle nose front would have dug into the water, and pitched the boat out of control.



  16. #25
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    225
    Thanks (Given)
    3
    Thanks (Received)
    11
    Likes (Given)
    20
    Likes (Received)
    43
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by WaterZebra View Post
    Campbell and Warby's hull configurations were pretty different. Warby used an aft stabilizer which kept the 3 point "planted" on the water where Campbell did not. All Warby had to do was "power thru" to get the speed he needed. The K7 never really gave a hint before lifting off. Having blown over myself I can tell you the ride always is smoothest and fastest right before going skyward.
    I don't agree, if you watch the video closely you can clearly see the sponsons lifting well before she actually goes. Now they think they know why it blew over and are carrying out some tests to prove their theory. I think they will announce it next year sometime.

  17. #26
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Cardington Ohio
    Posts
    19,679
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    As a friend/fan of Warbys, he is a bad ass.

    For proof, watch the documentary about his record attempt.

    They were struggling to get through the 280/290’s and couldn’t figure out why.
    They knew they had the hull and the power but couldn’t get there.

    He had a professor (I think) on his crew who was running calculations on their set up.
    He determined the rudder was too deep and causing to much drag.

    Said if the removed 4” it equaled a reduction of x thousand lbs of drag.

    Ken decided 6” would be better!

    They had a cutting torch on site but no goggles.

    Ken wouldn’t let his crew do it because of the risk to their vision so he did it.

    While cutting the bottom of the rudder off, he kept one eye covered.
    When asked why he covered one eye he said, in case it blinded him he would still have one good eye so he could still drive!

    It worked and they went 317!

    To remind myself of how important that record is, I am reminded that every attempt since then has ended up killing that person!


    Quote Originally Posted by kelvin523 View Post
    Real-time pressure differential telemetry is a fantastic opportunity; these are in ground effect craft imo\. The plywood, 60$ jet engine and > 300mph is nothing short of genius, passion and fortitude. I'm not sure I would have enough courage to even start it up; let alone push the throttle to the wall. What these folks accomplished is legendary.
    I'd rather be competitive w/junk I built in my garage than win w/stuff I bought.


    I refuse to allow common sense to interfere w/my boat buying decisions.


    Checkmate 16' 140 Johnson
    Hydrostream 17' Vector FrankenRude I
    Laser 480 (?) 21' w/GT 200
    Glastron Carlson Conquest w/XP 2.6
    Glastron Carlson CVX 20 w/XP 2.6
    24' Sonic w/twin 250 Johnsons
    24' Sonic w/twin 250 HO Johnsons
    19' STV River Rocket w/FrankenRude II
    Allison XR 2002 w/Frankenrude II
    Hydrostream 18' V-King w/Frankenrude II

  18. Likes mikesufka liked this post
  19. #27
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Cardington Ohio
    Posts
    19,679
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Just found these on my phone, from 20 yrs ago!
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails F1A4A0AE-0BC7-4AE6-A341-734C1B123096.jpg   9C35CC79-31F6-4317-860C-10BD4693A241.jpg  
    I'd rather be competitive w/junk I built in my garage than win w/stuff I bought.


    I refuse to allow common sense to interfere w/my boat buying decisions.


    Checkmate 16' 140 Johnson
    Hydrostream 17' Vector FrankenRude I
    Laser 480 (?) 21' w/GT 200
    Glastron Carlson Conquest w/XP 2.6
    Glastron Carlson CVX 20 w/XP 2.6
    24' Sonic w/twin 250 Johnsons
    24' Sonic w/twin 250 HO Johnsons
    19' STV River Rocket w/FrankenRude II
    Allison XR 2002 w/Frankenrude II
    Hydrostream 18' V-King w/Frankenrude II

  20. Thanks kelvin523 thanked for this post
    Likes Jimboat, Frank Molé liked this post
  21. #28
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Florida Keys
    Posts
    3,042
    Thanks (Given)
    44
    Thanks (Received)
    147
    Likes (Given)
    380
    Likes (Received)
    801
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The water speed record is the most dangerous of all speed records. I read that since 1900, it has had an 85% mortality rate


    '95 STV "The Blue Goose"


  22. Likes Instigator liked this post
  23. #29
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    N/A
    Posts
    164
    Thanks (Given)
    7
    Thanks (Received)
    7
    Likes (Given)
    13
    Likes (Received)
    48
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Really great thread; worthy of creating an "In-Effect" forum imo\

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0RPdEiI_foI

  24. #30
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    1,562
    Thanks (Given)
    10
    Thanks (Received)
    77
    Likes (Given)
    144
    Likes (Received)
    591
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    85% chance of dying. Who on earth would even think about attempting a speed run with those odds?
    Top fuel drag boat record is around 265 mph. But they get to that speed in a few seconds and shut it down. I think the long runs and the little higher speed is the line being crossed.
    Last edited by Brad Zastrow; 11-25-2022 at 11:20 AM.

  25. Likes FUJIMO liked this post
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Aeromarine Research