Pillars of creation

[boostalmighty]

We must remind our self, that religious books are not science text books.

However, modern science on earth has a fundamental GAP.

Scientists do Not Know HOW Life (living organisms) appeared within lifeless molecules in the evolutionary cycle. Materialistic Scientists only know WHEN life was introduced, into inanimate matter in the evolutionary timeline.

And if Life is not inherent in atoms & lifeless molecules, then scientists (including Neil Degrasse Tyson) will never have empirical evidence of abiogenesis. Whereas, religion states the source of Life is a supreme being - God.

so basically, everything is divine and magical until science can explain it.

[Shaun K]

so basically, everything is divine and magical until science can explain it.

Science said the jab was safe & effective, did you believe that "explanation" ?

[boostalmighty]

Science said the jab was safe & effective, did you believe that "explanation" ?

no, science never actually did. power hungry individuals changed definitions to suit their narratives.

[Shaun K]

no, science never actually did. power hungry individuals changed definitions to suit their narratives.

But believe or trust the science has been the go to phrase to get people on board, right? Goes a lot further than vaccines btw. Academia gets a lot milage out of that phrase, right? For so many topics including the one brought up in this thread. My opinion at this point in time is that phrase is done, finished, laughable. Just my opinion. Nothing personal btw my response is really towards Cuda who always starts these threads for this exact reason. You would think he would have the balls to come in here and articulate himself instead of link to media actors like degrasse tyson


https://www.brown.edu/news/2022-08-09/overestimation

People who disagree with scientists often overestimate their own scientific knowledge, study finds

"After surveying thousands of Americans on the COVID-19 vaccine, climate change and other contested issues, scholars found a correlation between how much people think they know and deviation from scientific consensus."

[Stoker boy]

no, science never actually did. power hungry individuals changed definitions to suit their narratives.

So science did not create the jab?

[Stoker boy]

But believe or trust the science has been the go to phrase to get people on board, right? Goes a lot further than vaccines btw. Academia gets a lot milage out of that phrase, right? For so many topics including the one brought up in this thread. My opinion at this point in time is that phrase is done, finished, laughable. Just my opinion. Nothing personal btw my response is really towards Cuda who always starts these threads for this exact reason. You would think he would have the balls to come in here and articulate himself instead of link to media actors like degrasse tyson


https://www.brown.edu/news/2022-08-09/overestimation

People who disagree with scientists often overestimate their own scientific knowledge, study finds

"After surveying thousands of Americans on the COVID-19 vaccine, climate change and other contested issues, scholars found a correlation between how much people think they know and deviation from scientific consensus."

Mr. cuda enjoys being manhandled and slapped around. I guess it’s a good thing he is the copy paste king.

When he speaks what’s on his mind it seems to be of a perverted sexual nature.

[Lake X Kid]

so basically, everything is divine and magical until science can explain it.

The laws of nature has limitations. Atoms and molecules are mechanistic patterns — that is why mathematics is a vital tool for understanding the mechanistic patterns of matter/molecules.

However, science has limitations quantifying the important values in the human condition. Like the Values of ... love, beauty, goodness, creativity, altruism, and truth. What is ... the weight of love, the breadth of beauty, the width of goodness, the length of creativity, the mass of altruism, and the height of truth?

The human condition is more than mere molecular bodily-structure and scientific definitions.

I will repeat myself:
Scientists do Not Know HOW Life (living organisms) appeared within lifeless molecules in the evolutionary cycle. Materialistic Scientists only know WHEN life was introduced, into inanimate matter in the evolutionary timeline.

And if Life is not inherent in atoms & lifeless molecules, then scientists (including Neil Degrasse Tyson) will never have empirical evidence of abiogenesis. Whereas, religion states the source of Life is a supreme being - God.

[CDave]

[Shaun K]

And if Life is not inherent in atoms & lifeless molecules, then scientists (including Neil Degrasse Tyson) will never have empirical evidence of abiogenesis.

But Tyson is not a scientist of any kind, he is a complete fraud with some paperwork saying he studied at Harvard, Princton and Columbia. And honestly, I never heard a "scientist" sound so damn unintelligent and so devoid of any real technical explanation when trying to prove his ideas. His peers imo include Bill Nye and Charles Darwin.

Just for example just listen to the first 2 mins of his explanation why he believes we went to the moon before he goes into the climate change grift. If *anybody* wants to explain to me why I should believe we went to the moon please have at it. Promise I'll be respectful in any response

[Stoker boy]

But Tyson is not a scientist of any kind, he is a complete fraud with some paperwork saying he studied at Harvard, Princton and Columbia. And honestly, I never heard a "scientist" sound so damn unintelligent and so devoid of any real technical explanation when trying to prove his ideas. His peers imo include Bill Nye and Charles Darwin.

Just for example just listen to the first 2 mins of his explanation why he believes we went to the moon before he goes into the climate change grift. If *anybody* wants to explain to me why I should believe we went to the moon please have at it. Promise I'll be respectful in any response

In my opinion Tyson is a fraud. Did we go to the moon, I don’t know, I wasn’t involved in the inner circle. If we did or if we didn’t I’m not aware if it has affected my life one way or the other.

One thing I know for sure, I stopped believing our government has any credibility years ago.

[Shaun K]

Did we go to the moon, I don’t know, I wasn’t involved in the inner circle.

Folks can believe what they want, I could care less. I'm just a science denier

[Stoker boy]

I am a science denier as well, especially when it comes to Covid.

[Shaun K]

I am a science denier as well, especially when it comes to Covid.

unedited interview before death 1999, 15 yr NDA was signed, released 2015

[David - WI]

unedited interview before death 1999, 15 yr NDA was signed, released 2015

THAT is fake, that's not Kubrick... I would say click the YouTube link and read the comments before wasting any time watching the video.

[Shaun K]

THAT is fake, that's not Kubrick... I would say click the YouTube link and read the comments before wasting any time watching the video.

Youtube would never lie or censor, right ? Do you think we went 240k miles to the moon in that thing pictured above? I mean maybe once it was a romantic notion but come on.


Here's another space moment youtube makes almost impossible to find