User Tag List

Page 48 of 89 FirstFirst ... 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 ... LastLast
Results 706 to 720 of 1323
  1. #706
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    aalsmeer
    Posts
    1,476
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    165
    Likes (Given)
    13
    Likes (Received)
    269
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Thumbs up

    Btw it is minus 9 here
    Celsius that is
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails 20230122_160401.jpg  

  2. #707
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Princeton, NJ
    Posts
    4,035
    Thanks (Given)
    315
    Thanks (Received)
    232
    Likes (Given)
    2531
    Likes (Received)
    2099
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by noli View Post
    .

    Mr Fun ,

    This thread isn't meant to be read

    if there's something bothering you and you want to get even with the world, this is where you put your complaints

    The more politics the better !
    .


    Quote Originally Posted by mr fun View Post
    mr noli , not sure where that comment is coming from



    sorry just me venting ... carry on ..






    .

  3. #708
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Tourist Trap, Florida
    Posts
    14,753
    Thanks (Given)
    381
    Thanks (Received)
    1302
    Likes (Given)
    5602
    Likes (Received)
    11031
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Nicola Tesla said that point of use power was the ONLY viable power solution. Batteries are not gonna do it. Sorry just my 2 cts and the opinion of the father of elec. and the man the biggest selling ev is named after. So probably just the political and short sighted mumbling of a fool.

    83 V-King, 96 Mariner, 200 hp ff block 2.5 w/a 28p choppa
    We gotta clean this liberal mess up, VOTE TRUMP TO MAGA!
    Rebuild thread:
    http://www.screamandfly.com/showthre...-it&highlight=
    http://www.screamandfly.com/showthre...cs.&highlight=
    Videos

  4. Likes pcrussell50 liked this post
  5. #709
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    aalsmeer
    Posts
    1,476
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    165
    Likes (Given)
    13
    Likes (Received)
    269
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    There are still other options than just battery's!
    This would not require putting your expensively made vehicle in the scrap yard
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Screenshot_20230123_073012_Chrome.jpg  

  6. #710
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    aalsmeer
    Posts
    1,476
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    165
    Likes (Given)
    13
    Likes (Received)
    269
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    In the interest of clickbait


  7. #711
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Palm City Fla
    Posts
    7,211
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    834
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    6513
    Mentioned
    13 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by PanRonnie View Post
    Btw it is minus 9 here
    Celsius that is
    So Ronnie, what you're saying is that it's 15.8* outside ...

    I rekkon you could always use your battery powered heater to stay warm ...

    I liked how none of the "greenies" had a comment on the ratio of money General Motors is willing to spend on the next revolution of the small block Chevrolet vs golf carts ...
    And part of the golf cart money ... is going towards gasoline vehicle production ..

    Chaz = thinking, the General ain't really buyin into the left-wing dream ...

  8. #712
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    aalsmeer
    Posts
    1,476
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    165
    Likes (Given)
    13
    Likes (Received)
    269
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    No battery's here! france is the country almost completly nuclear powered
    Which they use to heat the wine
    So staying warm with nuclear wine here

  9. #713
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    1,564
    Thanks (Given)
    10
    Thanks (Received)
    78
    Likes (Given)
    144
    Likes (Received)
    593
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Chaz View Post
    So Ronnie, what you're saying is that it's 15.8* outside ...

    I rekkon you could always use your battery powered heater to stay warm ...

    I liked how none of the "greenies" had a comment on the ratio of money General Motors is willing to spend on the next revolution of the small block Chevrolet vs golf carts ...
    And part of the golf cart money ... is going towards gasoline vehicle production ..

    Chaz = thinking, the General ain't really buyin into the left-wing dream ...
    Now for the rest of the story: Yes, General Motors is one of the few automakers spending money on new gasoline engines with a budget of $854 million. They are also budgeting $35 Billion by 2025 on EV technology. Just a small difference of about 35 times more.

  10. #714
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Santa barbara, ca/boulder city, nv
    Posts
    1,875
    Thanks (Given)
    557
    Thanks (Received)
    76
    Likes (Given)
    636
    Likes (Received)
    301
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    [QUOTE=CUDA;[URL="tel:3375821"]3375821[/URL]]
    Quote Originally Posted by pcrussell50 View Post
    32 years and the best battery technology we have, has hardly moved an inch. The only thing lithium ion has done has been to become in more common use. And the only thing you can do to increase range is build heavier battery packs. That does not solve it’s problems.

    Your wrong on no improvements in 32 years, I see a increase of eight times between 2008 and 2020 ? please explain where you get your facts, these are real facts.


    But you talk convincingly, quite the knowitALL.

    are you the childern's autho<header role="banner" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Karla, Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; background-color: rgb(235, 239, 242);">
    <form class="utility-search-form" action="https://www.energy.gov/search/site?"><label for="utility-menu-search" class="visually-hidden" style="font-size: 0.875rem; font-weight: 700; overflow: hidden; clip: rect(1px, 1px, 1px, 1px); width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-wrap: normal; position: absolute !important;">Enter the terms you wish to search for.</label><input id="utility-menu-search" title="Enter the terms you wish to search for." name="keywords" maxlength="128" class="utility-menu-search-input" type="search" placeholder="Search Energy.gov" aria-label="Enter the terms you wish to search for." style="font-size: 0.8125rem; max-width: 100%; background-image: url(&quot;/themes/particle/apps/drupal/../../dist/app-drupal/assets/./search_icon.svg?81e91566df68843bf1cbc3c40751d891&quot; background-position: 0.9375rem top; background-size: 0.9375rem 6.5rem; background-repeat: no-repeat; background-attachment: scroll; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; color: rgb(255, 255, 255); font-weight: 700; margin: 0px; padding-left: 2.5rem; transition: width 0.25s ease 0s; width: 214px; border-width: initial; border-style: none; border-color: initial;"><button class="visually-hidden" type="submit" style="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); border-width: 0.0625rem; border-style: solid; border-color: rgb(41, 41, 41); color: rgb(41, 41, 41); font-weight: 700; font-size: 0.8125rem; padding: 0.9375rem 1.25rem; text-transform: uppercase; cursor: pointer; overflow: hidden; clip: rect(1px, 1px, 1px, 1px); width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-wrap: normal; position: absolute !important;">SEARCH</button></form>
    <nav class="nav nav--mainoffice nav--utility nav--top" style="height: 15px; margin: 0px; padding: 0.5rem 0px; display: inline-block; background-color: rgb(31, 31, 31); float: right; overflow: hidden;">National Labs
    Energy.gov Offices
    Leadership
    Newsroom


    </nav>

    <nav role="navigation" aria-labelledby="main-nav" class="navbar navbar--suboffice" style="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); z-index: 11; width: 100vw; max-width: 100vw; position: relative; left: 951.5px; right: 951.5px; margin-left: -50vw; margin-right: -50vw; box-shadow: rgb(200, 203, 200) 0.0625rem 0.0625rem 0.0625rem 0px; border-bottom: 0.0625rem solid rgb(200, 203, 200);">

    Office ofENERGY EFFICIENCY & RENEWABLE ENERGY

    <nav class="nav nav--dropdown-menu nav--keyboard-navigation nav--suboffice navbar-about nav--about nav--main nav--top" style="height: 5.5rem; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; display: flex; border-right: 0.0625rem solid rgb(200, 203, 200);">
    VEHICLE TECHNOLOGIES OFFICE</nav>







    </nav></header><main class="container" role="main" style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; max-width: 77.5rem; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Karla, Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; background-color: rgb(235, 239, 242);"><section class="row"><aside class="layout-content-top">
    Vehicle Technologies Office

    FOTW #1234, April 18, 2022: Volumetric Energy Density of Lithium-ion Batteries Increased by More than Eight Times Between 2008 and 2020

    APRIL 18, 2022



    </aside><svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" viewBox="0 0 32 32" version="1.1" role="img" aria-labelledby="at-svg-email-1" class="at-icon at-icon-email" style="fill: rgb(102, 102, 102); width: 32px; height: 32px;"><g><g fill-rule="evenodd"></g></g></svg>

    <svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" viewBox="0 0 32 32" version="1.1" role="img" aria-labelledby="at-svg-facebook-2" class="at-icon at-icon-facebook" style="fill: rgb(102, 102, 102); width: 32px; height: 32px;"><g></g></svg>
    <svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" viewBox="0 0 32 32" version="1.1" role="img" aria-labelledby="at-svg-twitter-3" class="at-icon at-icon-twitter" style="fill: rgb(102, 102, 102); width: 32px; height: 32px;"><g></g></svg>
    <svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" viewBox="0 0 32 32" version="1.1" role="img" aria-labelledby="at-svg-linkedin-4" class="at-icon at-icon-linkedin" style="fill: rgb(102, 102, 102); width: 32px; height: 32px;"><g></g></svg>
    <svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" viewBox="0 0 32 32" version="1.1" role="img" aria-labelledby="at-svg-pinterest_share-5" class="at-icon at-icon-pinterest_share" style="fill: rgb(102, 102, 102); width: 32px; height: 32px;"><g></g></svg>





    <nav aria-label="breadcrumb" role="navigation" style="box-sizing: border-box;">
    • Vehicle Technologies Office
    • FOTW #1234, April 18, 2022: Volumetric Energy Density of Lithium-ion Batteries Increased by More than Eight Times Between 2008 and 2020

    </nav>
    <article role="article" about="/eere/vehicles/articles/fotw-1234-april-18-2022-volumetric-energy-density-lithium-ion-batteries" typeof="schema:Article" style="box-sizing: border-box;"><section class="layout" style="box-sizing: border-box; background-image: url(&quot;&quot;">Subscribe to Fact of the Week
    Volumetric energy density refers to the amount of energy that can be contained within a given volume. Increasing the volumetric energy density of batteries allows electric vehicles (EVs) to travel further without increasing the size of the battery pack. Conversely, it can allow an EV to travel the same distance with a smaller battery pack, thus saving space, weight, and manufacturing costs. Given the enormous benefit of increasing the energy density of batteries for EVs, there has been heavy investment in battery development by the Department of Energy and private industry that has yielded impressive gains. In 2008, lithium-ion batteries had a volumetric energy density of 55 watt-hours per liter; by 2020, that had increased to 450 watt-hours per liter.







    Source: Nitin Muralidharan, Ethan C. Self, Marm Dixit, Zhijia Du, Rachid Essehli, Ruhul Amin, Jagjit Nanda, Ilias Belharouak, Advanced Energy Materials, January 2022.


    <article style="box-sizing: border-box;">Fact #1234 Dataset

    </article>









    </section>
    </article>


    </section></main>
    Ah, Ok Cudes... Sorry I didn't get back to you sooner. "The man" was running me hard this weekend, (emitting great clouds of CO2 ;-) ), AND my wife and little girls came out as well. Don't know how I pulled it off.

    Anyway, your chart... some issues... Including wrongly throwing your lithium ion batteries under the bus by giving artificially low energy density figures for it in the early years. Did I just come out and defend lithium ion? You bet I did, when appropriate. Sit tight for bit though this isn't a beat-up session on you, I'll throw you a bone...

    -First look at 2008... It says 55Wh/liter. That is only 2/3 of the energy density of lead acid. By 2008, lithium ion was 17 years old. There is pretty much no way that as recently as 2008, 17 years into the history of lithium ion, that lithium ion was still under performing lead acid. It's just too far fetched to believe. Lithium ion is better than that. (There, I said it ;-) )

    -Also, why does the graph begin more than halfway through the history of lithium ion? Why cut off more than half of the history of lithium ion? Unless you are trying to shape a message.

    -Also, the fact that they are using Wh/liter instead of using Wh/kilogram is a little fishy in and of itself. The BIG issue with lithium ion is weight, not volume. Although volume is an issue too, just not as big of one as weight.

    Throwing you the first bone... You probably googled "energy density" and true enough in science and engineering, energy/volume is energy density. But since weight is our issue here, we want energy/mass, which in science and engineering, we call specific energy.

    ===

    Now the buildup to the second bone I'm going to throw you, or a tip of my hat to you, for calling me out...

    So... the latest lithium ion specific energy is 270-290 Wh/kilogram. And here is where you are technically correct to call me out for saying there has been almost no improvement. Because there has been improvement, over 32 years. More than double. Almost triple, from somewhere around 100 Wh/kilogram. So why did I say there has hardly been any improvement at all? Well, because of both the timeline and the scale what we are trying to replace with batteries.

    -Timeline: A 3x improvement (not even that, but close), over 32 years is horrifyingly little for a high tech endeavor. It's unbelievably painfully little considering the finest minds in science and industry have been working as hard as they can to improve it in laptops, tablets, cell phones, watches, and other consumer electronics.

    -Scale against petro fuels: The latest lithium ion batteries are 270-290 Wh/kilogram. But gasoline is over 16,550 Wh/kg. More than 57 times greater. So an improvement in lithium ion of triple, from 100-300 (being generous), is miniscule. Hardly anything at all, if you are comparing to it's competition. We are zero percent closer to having lithium ion powered recreational boats that can Scream and Fly for more than a few minutes at a time.

    Still anyway Cudes, I'll give you that over 32 years, lithium ion has improved.

    It's just that for a tech industry, it's pitifully little. And it's improvement is almost invisible in comparison what you are trying to replace with it.

    (BTW, almost all of the big improvements have come from improvements in the ancillary systems like charging, cell monitoring, heating and cooling of battery packs, etc... To hopefully keep the batteries from turning into a fire bomb. But even still, they are cutting it thin, as we see all over the place).

    ===

    Meant to say a thing about your cancer. Prayers from my family to yours. 68 is way too young. I lost my dad to cancer at 72, way before we were ready.

    -Peter
    Last edited by pcrussell50; 01-23-2023 at 08:46 PM.
    "padded wonder"
    __________
    the wet:
    Hydrostream Viper, 140 v4 crossflow, some Raker props
    16' Baja/Tahiti/Sidewinder clone, 135 v4 crossflow
    17' boston whaler alert, 90 merc fourstroke
    13' boston whaler, 40hp yamaha

    the dry:
    2003 bmw ///M5
    1993 mustang/griggs racing road race car
    and a handful of clunkers

  11. #715
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Sunshine Coast, Queensland
    Posts
    188
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    6
    Likes (Given)
    1
    Likes (Received)
    47
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by PanRonnie View Post
    In the interest of clickbait

    Port engine is using a hydrogen fuel cell, starboard is a standard turboprop. So not full electric.

  12. #716
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Santa barbara, ca/boulder city, nv
    Posts
    1,875
    Thanks (Given)
    557
    Thanks (Received)
    76
    Likes (Given)
    636
    Likes (Received)
    301
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by wettek;[URL="tel:3376004"
    3376004[/URL]]Port engine is using a hydrogen fuel cell, starboard is a standard turboprop. So not full electric.
    Also, the Do228, which has been in service since the early 1980's has a non-pressurized, box section fuselage. You can put seats in it, but even though it has proper gas turbines, capable of high altitude, you can't fly it very high because you'd suffocate your passengers in the thin air.

    BUT it's boxy fuselage shape, and large, heavy lifting wing make it good for lifting large loads off of short runways (at least with the power available from the proper gas turbines). The tradeoff is that the big, high lift wing means that it's slow.

    BUT, if you are going to play around with heavy electric propulsion experiments, you can fill the boxy space up with big heavy stuff, and the high lift wing can get you off the ground easier than a wing designed to go fast and high. It's probably an ideal testbed for testing EV power that will never be able to carry freight or passengers.

    ===

    Also, the Dornier 228 uses 776hp engines, or about 575KW. When I Google pictures of A 575KW-capable hydrogen fuel cell, they are HUGE. They might have stuffed one in there… one. Or else tbey are running a small one over clocked that can’t sustain it for long (like the Hellkat Catamaran), or they are running it at a lower power and using either asymmetric thrust or reduced thrust in the good side.

    -Peter
    Last edited by pcrussell50; 01-23-2023 at 08:00 PM.
    "padded wonder"
    __________
    the wet:
    Hydrostream Viper, 140 v4 crossflow, some Raker props
    16' Baja/Tahiti/Sidewinder clone, 135 v4 crossflow
    17' boston whaler alert, 90 merc fourstroke
    13' boston whaler, 40hp yamaha

    the dry:
    2003 bmw ///M5
    1993 mustang/griggs racing road race car
    and a handful of clunkers

  13. #717
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Palm City Fla
    Posts
    7,211
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    834
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    6513
    Mentioned
    13 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Brad Zastrow View Post
    Now for the rest of the story: Yes, General Motors is one of the few automakers spending money on new gasoline engines with a budget of $854 million. They are also budgeting $35 Billion by 2025 on EV technology. Just a small difference of about 35 times more.
    Bradley, ifin you had read the story in the link, you would have seen the EV money mentioned was for a plant where they built battery cooling lines. Not their complete golf cart budget.
    The General building the sixth gen small block only guarantees that gas engines will be around a lot longer than FJB will be in office.
    I can only hope they used part of the government hand out, to develop the new pee-wee.

    it's funny you can spit out a zesty response in what you perceive as a gotcha moment. But turn into a cricket in the dozen or so direct questions i have asked to you in the past ...

    It's a balmy 78* and mostly cloudy here today. Where you're at, I'm sure you have had to run the electric heater in you 60 mile a day trip. Just how much battery life do you lose by running the heater ???
    My guess your answer will be ..................


    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    I needed some JP2 for my honing tank. I went to our local airport and when the man got finished filling up a jet, he drove the truck over to where I was at ... and filled up both my five gallon cans. I paid him and was on my way.
    Sure seems easier to just fill up the tank with gas, diesel, or jet fuel than waiting on a 30 billion dollar accident to happen, in order to run a heavy, overpriced, battery or a multi-plex hydrogen demodulator. Great Scott ...

    This looks too good to be true .. All you green-heads need to buy up as much stock as you can !

    https://nikolamotor.com/

    But then, maybe it's just a left wing dream ...

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trevor_Milton

    I love the down hill .. no motor .. $34,000,000,000.00 .. run ... LMAO



    How bout them ZAPGO batterys ...

    I'll say it again ... PT Barnum was right ...


  14. Thanks David - WI thanked for this post
    Likes pcrussell50 liked this post
  15. #718
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Santa barbara, ca/boulder city, nv
    Posts
    1,875
    Thanks (Given)
    557
    Thanks (Received)
    76
    Likes (Given)
    636
    Likes (Received)
    301
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    That was a sad shame. A lot of people lost a lot of money being taken by him.

    Unfortunately it’s a story as old as time… People who want for something to be so, badly enough, are susceptible to believing things they are told, when the teller sounds convincing. A shame, because a few well known facts, and some grade school math, is usually enough to tell you enough to clutch your wallet and your hopes, a little tighter.

    -Peter
    Last edited by pcrussell50; 01-24-2023 at 11:00 AM.
    "padded wonder"
    __________
    the wet:
    Hydrostream Viper, 140 v4 crossflow, some Raker props
    16' Baja/Tahiti/Sidewinder clone, 135 v4 crossflow
    17' boston whaler alert, 90 merc fourstroke
    13' boston whaler, 40hp yamaha

    the dry:
    2003 bmw ///M5
    1993 mustang/griggs racing road race car
    and a handful of clunkers

  16. Likes laser_ED, David - WI liked this post
  17. #719
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    1,564
    Thanks (Given)
    10
    Thanks (Received)
    78
    Likes (Given)
    144
    Likes (Received)
    593
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    It is too easy to fact check you. You pick and choose your information to suit whatever conspiracy theory you are interested in. The automakers are going EV on many cars as the public is tired of gas prices. The Tesla uses a heat A/C pump. So, the cold weather is not really an issue on battery life. Extreme cold can affect the battery range a small amount. But I do not live in the Antarctic. There is always someone who talks about things they know nothing about and reports it as fact. I own a Tesla and it is not an issue. It could be long time before EV's replace trucks that tow or boats that need a lot of power but for a daily driver car or truck they are going to be major part of the market in the next few years. Now to address your worry of why consumers are buying 4 stroke OB's it's because they want them, including me. It is not a government play to force 4 strokes down our throat. More power, better fuel economy and better reliability. No smelly smoke to deal with on the older two strokes. The O/B market has exploded because of the new engines.

  18. Likes JasonRS liked this post
  19. #720
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    aalsmeer
    Posts
    1,476
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    165
    Likes (Given)
    13
    Likes (Received)
    269
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Lichtyear one a dutch startup from the guys who won the solar challenge is in chapter 7
    Sono motors is basicly bankrupt
    I would ha love for these compagny's to make it
    But the sad fact is the electric model T ford still has to be invented
    Like a skater with brandnew mercury 450R's there will always be people able to afford that just not in high enough numbers to make difference
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Screenshot_20230124_182751_Chrome.jpg   Screenshot_20230124_182852_Chrome.jpg  

Page 48 of 89 FirstFirst ... 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. World Speed record attempt for an electric aircraft on schedule.
    By Lake X Kid in forum The Scream And Fly Lounge
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 09-18-2021, 10:45 PM
  2. Vintage Race boat world Record - $500
    By faztbullet in forum Ebay Listings and Other Internet Listings
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 06-06-2018, 06:25 PM
  3. Electric boat record
    By FrenchPhil in forum Four Stroke and Direct Injected Two Stroke Engines
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 08-22-2010, 03:41 PM
  4. New Pontoon boat world record
    By Rob King in forum General Boating Discussion
    Replies: 54
    Last Post: 10-11-2009, 08:21 PM
  5. World Record Boat
    By MRNOITALL in forum General Boating Discussion
    Replies: 33
    Last Post: 10-28-2004, 05:14 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Aeromarine Research