User Tag List
Results 1 to 3 of 3
Thread: WMH Versus WMV Carbs
-
02-18-2021, 08:42 PM #15000 RPM
- Join Date
- Oct 2008
- Location
- Plainville, CT
- Posts
- 804
- Thanks (Given)
- 417
- Thanks (Received)
- 23
- Likes (Given)
- 377
- Likes (Received)
- 67
- Mentioned
- 0 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
WMH Versus WMV Carbs
Any benefit to the WMV carbs over the WMHs? Like better idle, or better performance, or better fuel mileage?
I see the WMVs have 6 idle air jets and no progression jets for all three carbs, whereas the WMHs had only 3 idle air jets and 6 progression jets. Seems fewer jets on the WMVs may be an advantage.
Although keeping track of all of the different sizes on the WMV idle jest may be a pain. Also, the idle screw adjustments are strange because some are 1 1/2 and some are 1/78 turns. This could drive you crazy too.
-
02-20-2021, 10:48 PM #2
been reading older posts and someone said the guys on here mostly run the older WH because they are easier to "tune", maybe because like what you said many jets and functions on the newer ones to get right
-
Glastron1987 thanked for this postGlastron1987 liked this post
-
02-21-2021, 07:21 AM #3
I haven't run wmh but I have run wmv18s (200) which is supposed to b the best wmv and my wh46 tuned to my motor ,run alot better , more rpm, more snappy imo
-
Glastron1987 thanked for this postGlastron1987 liked this post
Similar Threads
-
2.0 versus 2.5
By Glastron1987 in forum Technical DiscussionReplies: 15Last Post: 07-14-2019, 03:28 PM -
Mercury Tech: 245 versus 260
By bullwhipjkg in forum Technical DiscussionReplies: 18Last Post: 02-25-2010, 02:45 PM -
50:1 versus 25:1
By capnzee in forum Technical DiscussionReplies: 21Last Post: 08-16-2007, 03:41 PM -
C-5 Z-06 versus C-6 which is better
By Charlie M in forum Other MotorsportsReplies: 57Last Post: 12-22-2006, 11:31 PM -
OMC v6 200 versus 225 ('96)
By tcsmith315 in forum Technical DiscussionReplies: 15Last Post: 08-01-2003, 05:42 PM