User Tag List

Results 1 to 15 of 15
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    upstate newyork
    Posts
    441
    Thanks (Given)
    1
    Thanks (Received)
    5
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    23
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    22 progression merc four stroke

    I repowered my 22 progression with a new 200 merc pro xs four stroke. i rigged it myself as the local merc dealer was on hold due to covid. the boat was powered with a 250xs. i'm still experimenting with props but I have to say the new four strokes are remarkable motors. the v8 torque is great. the motor is smooth and quiet in all rpm ranges.

  2. Likes WavetoWave, Air It Out, JPEROG, bouyhead liked this post
  3. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Location
    Miami
    Posts
    843
    Thanks (Given)
    30
    Thanks (Received)
    106
    Likes (Given)
    824
    Likes (Received)
    770
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Richard View Post
    I repowered my 22 progression with a new 200 merc pro xs four stroke. i rigged it myself as the local merc dealer was on hold due to covid. the boat was powered with a 250xs. i'm still experimenting with props but I have to say the new four strokes are remarkable motors. the v8 torque is great. the motor is smooth and quiet in all rpm ranges.
    Sounds awesome. Keep us posted. The new four strokes are great.

  4. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Rochester, NY
    Posts
    958
    Thanks (Given)
    50
    Thanks (Received)
    71
    Likes (Given)
    378
    Likes (Received)
    607
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Richard View Post
    I repowered my 22 progression with a new 200 merc pro xs four stroke. i rigged it myself as the local merc dealer was on hold due to covid. the boat was powered with a 250xs. i'm still experimenting with props but I have to say the new four strokes are remarkable motors. the v8 torque is great. the motor is smooth and quiet in all rpm ranges.
    Still waiting for a ride to compare it head to head with my 2.5 / 200. This should be interesting.

    BTW, As far as I know, this may be the very first 4.6 liter powered 22 Progression.
    Last edited by TooStroked; 08-09-2020 at 07:57 AM.
    1992 Progression 22
    Mercury Racing 250R

  5. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Rochester, NY
    Posts
    958
    Thanks (Given)
    50
    Thanks (Received)
    71
    Likes (Given)
    378
    Likes (Received)
    607
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I can just hear all the Long Island guys. "Anything less than a 300R is pffft." Not everybody needs (or can afford) a 300.
    1992 Progression 22
    Mercury Racing 250R

  6. Likes sonicss33, WavetoWave, bouyhead liked this post
  7. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    savannah,ga
    Posts
    1,183
    Thanks (Given)
    272
    Thanks (Received)
    82
    Likes (Given)
    821
    Likes (Received)
    485
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    How does that motor compare with the 250?
    Are you running the same props?
    I'm thinking going that route on the Paramount.

  8. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Location
    Miami
    Posts
    843
    Thanks (Given)
    30
    Thanks (Received)
    106
    Likes (Given)
    824
    Likes (Received)
    770
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    The new V8 ProXS engines come with a TM 1.75 or 4.88 1.85.
    Loads of torque. 6,200 RPM.

  9. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    144
    Thanks (Given)
    1
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Given)
    14
    Likes (Received)
    4
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Any pics??

  10. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Rochester, NY
    Posts
    958
    Thanks (Given)
    50
    Thanks (Received)
    71
    Likes (Given)
    378
    Likes (Received)
    607
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Air It Out View Post
    Any pics??
    I have one, but I'll let the OP post one up first. It is his boat after all.
    1992 Progression 22
    Mercury Racing 250R

  11. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    upstate newyork
    Posts
    441
    Thanks (Given)
    1
    Thanks (Received)
    5
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    23
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    As I understand it, Merc designed the pro xs as a direct replacement for their two stroke counterparts. My 250xs weighed 503 lbs. The four stroke 200 weighs th same. Everything was nearly plug and play. My smart craft gauges worked without extra cabling. The only thing I needed to add was a new sending unit for the water pressure gauge. I had no idea how to prop it so I turned to the bass boat guys who are replacing their two stroke motors with four strokes. They run the new mercury Fury props. I was lucky enough to find a good use four blade and three blade. The floor blade seems to work best. I haven't really pushed it hard as i'm trying to pile on break in hours. Overall this motor is working very well for me. It's very smooth and has tons of torque. And there's no gas and oil mixing. If the question arises I went with the 200 largely for the price advantage. I'm not interested in having the fastest boat on the lake. The 200 was nearly $5000 cheaper than the 250 and who know how much I saved over the 300. If you get into those big horespower motors you better be ready to take a second mortgage on your home.The best part is the sound it makes at startup.

  12. Likes TooStroked, JBS, WavetoWave, bouyhead liked this post
  13. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Rochester, NY
    Posts
    958
    Thanks (Given)
    50
    Thanks (Received)
    71
    Likes (Given)
    378
    Likes (Received)
    607
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Air It Out View Post
    Any pics??
    1992 Progression 22
    Mercury Racing 250R

  14. Likes WavetoWave, engineermike, bouyhead liked this post
  15. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Location
    Miami
    Posts
    843
    Thanks (Given)
    30
    Thanks (Received)
    106
    Likes (Given)
    824
    Likes (Received)
    770
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Richard View Post
    As I understand it, Merc designed the pro xs as a direct replacement for their two stroke counterparts. My 250xs weighed 503 lbs. The four stroke 200 weighs th same. Everything was nearly plug and play. My smart craft gauges worked without extra cabling. The only thing I needed to add was a new sending unit for the water pressure gauge. I had no idea how to prop it so I turned to the bass boat guys who are replacing their two stroke motors with four strokes. They run the new mercury Fury props. I was lucky enough to find a good use four blade and three blade. The floor blade seems to work best. I haven't really pushed it hard as i'm trying to pile on break in hours. Overall this motor is working very well for me. It's very smooth and has tons of torque. And there's no gas and oil mixing. If the question arises I went with the 200 largely for the price advantage. I'm not interested in having the fastest boat on the lake. The 200 was nearly $5000 cheaper than the 250 and who know how much I saved over the 300. If you get into those big horespower motors you better be ready to take a second mortgage on your home.The best part is the sound it makes at startup.
    Agree with that. The 200 is a great value. Same torque and low end power as the big ones. Smooth.

  16. #12
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    144
    Thanks (Given)
    1
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Given)
    14
    Likes (Received)
    4
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Looks better than I thought it would. I like it ����

  17. #13
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Baldwin N.Y.
    Posts
    313
    Thanks (Given)
    1
    Thanks (Received)
    20
    Likes (Given)
    2
    Likes (Received)
    46
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Hi i have a Verado on a 24 Progression. The Bravo One FS is a great prop for a Four Stroke!!

  18. #14
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    Amityville, NY
    Posts
    176
    Thanks (Given)
    27
    Thanks (Received)
    13
    Likes (Given)
    73
    Likes (Received)
    127
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Richard View Post
    As I understand it, Merc designed the pro xs as a direct replacement for their two stroke counterparts. My 250xs weighed 503 lbs. The four stroke 200 weighs th same. Everything was nearly plug and play. My smart craft gauges worked without extra cabling. The only thing I needed to add was a new sending unit for the water pressure gauge. I had no idea how to prop it so I turned to the bass boat guys who are replacing their two stroke motors with four strokes. They run the new mercury Fury props. I was lucky enough to find a good use four blade and three blade. The floor blade seems to work best. I haven't really pushed it hard as i'm trying to pile on break in hours. Overall this motor is working very well for me. It's very smooth and has tons of torque. And there's no gas and oil mixing. If the question arises I went with the 200 largely for the price advantage. I'm not interested in having the fastest boat on the lake. The 200 was nearly $5000 cheaper than the 250 and who know how much I saved over the 300. If you get into those big horespower motors you better be ready to take a second mortgage on your home.The best part is the sound it makes at startup.
    I came real close to repowering my 250xs P22 with a new 4 stroke. After a bit of research and talking numbers with the local dealer my best deal would have been the 300 proxs not the 300R. Looking forward to a follow up on this thread, particularly your prop choice and sweet spot cruising speed.

  19. #15
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    Amityville, NY
    Posts
    176
    Thanks (Given)
    27
    Thanks (Received)
    13
    Likes (Given)
    73
    Likes (Received)
    127
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by TooStroked View Post
    I can just hear all the Long Island guys. "Anything less than a 300R is pffft." Not everybody needs (or can afford) a 300.
    I racked up a boatload of hours with a 250xs P22 and have no regrets

Similar Threads

  1. Progression 24ld 1990 merc 300x 2002
    By mjf in forum Hulls larger than 20'
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 07-29-2020, 05:53 AM
  2. Comparison photo's Merc 225 4-stroke and Yamaha 225 4-stroke
    By AlaskaStreamin in forum General Boating Discussion
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 11-08-2002, 11:10 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •