30 yrs. later, global warming still hasn't sunk Maldives

[Forkin' Crazy]

30 yrs. later, global warming still hasn't sunk Maldives

Actually it would be 31.5yrs now.

[mrichartz]

It was to scare some into moving and drive property prices down so those asshats could buy the property cheap..look at where all of them buying property..



Michael

[CDave]

And they keep pushing the same lie. The scientist do it for funding and the politicians do it for power.

[wogi]

And they they keep pushing the same lie. The scientist do it for funding and the politicians do it for power.

Back in the 70's it was global cooling, time magazine had a big article on it saying that the earth was cooling and by 2000, the earth was to be froze over. Than it changed to global warming in the 90's because of a few draught years saying that by 2010's all fresh water would be evaporated. Now they call it climate change, this way they cant be proven wrong like in the last two domes day predictions. Now these over educated idiots are clamming that we will be under water in 12years!!!! because of climate change! LOL
And if this is so, why would Barrack Hussain Obamo , one of the biggest backers of this schit , be buying a 15million dollar house on the Hamptons????

[CDave]

I remember hearing that in elementary school. I saw a piece on climate a few weeks ago and they said we are about to go into a small cooling stage. Wonder what the climate change liars will be claiming then.

[FMP]

Guys you cannot look away from the overwhelming scientific agreement of a higher rate of warming resulting in part from human activity loading the atmosphere and other contributing factors. Say what you think but that's how it is. Of course if you search high and low for contradicting evidence you could find some but numbers don't lie on the loading and physical property changes and how it's changing things and the continued changes in the same direction. People use to believe the earth was flat, prove the scientific global community wrong. If we get into period of solar or slight orbit change one way or another it'll be quantitatively proven into the trend independent of atmospheric loading. Resulting increased ice cap melting is resulting in rise rate increases. What we load into the atmosphere as particulate or gaseous does can and does result in deposition which increases the melting of ice by solar heat absorption, independent of temperature increases. I don't think anyone can say we aren't changing things. Going from a to b as efficiently with the smallest cleanest footprint is in our benefit.
Not a bad idea
https://mobile.reuters.com/article/amp/idUSKBN2061FG

[wogi]

Guys you cannot look away from the overwhelming scientific agreement of a higher rate of warming resulting in part from human activity loading the atmosphere and other contributing factors. Say what you think but that's how it is. Of course if you search high and low for contradicting evidence you could find some but numbers don't lie on the loading and physical property changes and how it's changing things and the continued changes in the same direction. People use to believe the earth was flat, prove the scientific global community wrong. If we get into period of solar or slight orbit change one way or another it'll be quantitatively proven into the trend independent of atmospheric loading. Resulting increased ice cap melting is resulting in rise rate increases. What we load into the atmosphere as particulate or gaseous does can and does result in deposition which increases the melting of ice by solar heat absorption, independent of temperature increases. I don't think anyone can say we aren't changing things. Going from a to b as efficiently with the smallest cleanest footprint is in our benefit.
Not a bad idea
https://mobile.reuters.com/article/amp/idUSKBN2061FG

Has man effected his environment? Who really knows, those egg heads pushing this agenda don't seem to think that it applies to them as they use jets to go all over the globe to try and sell this bs. And to say that it has never the way it is now, how can you prove it with only 150years of data? things go in cycles the climate is always changing and if you want to stop carbon, what the hell are tree leaves, and green plants going to covert into oxygen? I don't believe that taking all the stuff away from us that the NEW GREEN DEAL wants to will do anything in the big picture when one figures in the rest of the world, like china!!!! Like pissing on a brush fire! So yes I'm going to look away from the agenda pushing idiots who have been predicting climate dome in one form or another my hole life, only to have their educated guessing proved wrong on their time table of dome predictions!

[bullet20vee]

Y'all forgot about the acid rain in the 80's that was going to kill all the crops and kill all the fish in the lakes and rivers. Those dipchits figured out how to make money from pushing a hoax on the people who are gullible enough to believe them.

[FMP]

Y'all forgot about the acid rain in the 80's that was going to kill all the crops and kill all the fish in the lakes and rivers. Those dipchits figured out how to make money from pushing a hoax on the people who are gullible enough to believe them.

It did, and how it did! We took pH rain and snow pack samples for years , watching lakes without buffer die in many ways. Your coal power stacks without scrubbers were killing things along with vehicles. The clean up through technology worked to lower the loading.

[FMP]

On a total amount, we were a fart in the wind compared to the US. The NE was affected by it , Vermont New England Maine Mass, NY etc etc and north to us. Hardwood forest were dying everywhere. You look up the history of it , that's how it was. Europe had the same thing going on until they cleaned up. We've done our small part to pollute the past but our population is very small compared to the US and our industry had it hit spots but amounts coming to us via the weather patterns from the industrial heartland of the US was what it was. Stupid name calling won't change that but if it helps you feel fuzzy and warm have at it.

[CDave]

It's like all this Corona virus alarm.
How many are aware in 2017 80,000 people died from the flu in the US. I believe the yearly average is around 30,000 a year die from the flu in the US. You don't hear the media up in arms about those numbers.
Always research whatever the news pushes as a crisis.

[wogi]

On a total amount, we were a fart in the wind compared to the US. The NE was affected by it , Vermont New England Maine Mass, NY etc etc and north to us. Hardwood forest were dying everywhere. You look up the history of it , that's how it was. Europe had the same thing going on until they cleaned up. We've done our small part to pollute the past but our population is very small compared to the US and our industry had it hit spots but amounts coming to us via the weather patterns from the industrial heartland of the US was what it was. Stupid name calling won't change that but if it helps you feel fuzzy and warm have at it.

Must get your facts from your black faced prime idiot

[FMP]

Must get your facts from your black faced prime idiot

Remember George H W Bush , we do .
https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/aci...oney-1.4934402

https://www.salon.com/2019/10/28/aci...-back_partner/

[FMP]

It's like all this Corona virus alarm.
How many are aware in 2017 80,000 people died from the flu in the US. I believe the yearly average is around 30,000 a year die from the flu in the US. You don't hear the media up in arms about those numbers.
Always research whatever the news pushes as a crisis.

100% but the Chinese response is impressive to try and contain .

[wogi]

Remember George H W Bush , we do .
https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/aci...oney-1.4934402

https://www.salon.com/2019/10/28/aci...-back_partner/

Whats your point? Bush, like the Clintons and Barack O were deep state globalist same as your black faced idiot leader