User Tag List

Results 1 to 12 of 12

Thread: Leak Down Test

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2018
    Location
    Maine/Ma
    Posts
    216
    Thanks (Given)
    78
    Thanks (Received)
    10
    Likes (Given)
    131
    Likes (Received)
    56
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Leak Down Test

    Morning all, finally got to checking the drop on power head i picked up in October. Last night i did a leak down test, just wondering why there is a fairly consistent difference from port side to starboard? i will list them in order, 1-3-5 then 2-4-6.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	2.5L CYLINDER 1.jpg 
Views:	80 
Size:	329.3 KB 
ID:	427833Click image for larger version. 

Name:	2.5L CYLINDER 3.jpg 
Views:	66 
Size:	342.8 KB 
ID:	427835Click image for larger version. 

Name:	2.5L CYLINDER 5.jpg 
Views:	58 
Size:	326.7 KB 
ID:	427836Click image for larger version. 

Name:	2.5L CYLINDER 2.jpg 
Views:	62 
Size:	308.7 KB 
ID:	427834Click image for larger version. 

Name:	2.5L CYLINDER 4.jpg 
Views:	57 
Size:	347.2 KB 
ID:	427837Click image for larger version. 

Name:	2.5L CYLINDER 6.jpg 
Views:	54 
Size:	356.9 KB 
ID:	427838

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Key Largo, Fl
    Posts
    3,272
    Thanks (Given)
    8
    Thanks (Received)
    215
    Likes (Given)
    30
    Likes (Received)
    585
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    My opinions on leakdown testing procedure are a little different than most,and render the most accurate results,again my opinion.Most folks follow the directions and put the piston at top dead...where there's no wear,and usually get low leakdown results accordingly.A poor mans leakdown test is really better,and is faster,cheaper,and easier...do a comp check,just write down the compression numbers,squirt a couple shots of 30 wt oil in each cylinder,spin the motor over a few seconds and recheck the compression...the amount the compression goes up will be close to overall leakdown percents.
    Now my way.Follow the normal procedure but instead of locking the flywheel near tdc,pull the motor from ports open to tdc on every cylinder,stopping at several spots along the way,and look at the resulting leakdown along the working stroke of the cylinder.
    We do this with a ratchet on the flywheel nut,with a long bolted in place tube extention on the ratchet handle...(3 foot long,specificly for this task).
    DO NOT USE A BREAKER BAR for this job...when you pull the piston over tdc the 40-50 pounds of pull required will turn to push and may DE-BRAIN you...the ratchet will allow the flywheel to spin to to open the ports.
    This procedure will locate bulged cylinders,scoring above the ports etc.,that a locked flywheel
    test won't know about.
    Also,for the most accurate results check the port side of a "v" motor by pulling the flywheel clockwise,and the starboard counterclockwise to place the piston in its thrust position.I test
    at 75 lbs.
    I figure if you're going to test you might as well get the best results you can,I should'nt have to tell you to keep fingers clear,and be careful,as the flywheel is going to spin as it goes over tdc,but i will anyway,BE CAREFUL,Chris




  3. Thanks bbezok, ssv1761982 thanked for this post
    Likes FMP liked this post
  4. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2018
    Location
    Maine/Ma
    Posts
    216
    Thanks (Given)
    78
    Thanks (Received)
    10
    Likes (Given)
    131
    Likes (Received)
    56
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    pm sent

  5. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    753
    Thanks (Given)
    3
    Thanks (Received)
    4
    Likes (Given)
    6
    Likes (Received)
    18
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The advice Chris has given you is the very best you will get from anyone. The reason you are seeing the difference between the port and starboard side is that you were rotating the flywheel in the same direction for both sides.

  6. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2018
    Location
    Maine/Ma
    Posts
    216
    Thanks (Given)
    78
    Thanks (Received)
    10
    Likes (Given)
    131
    Likes (Received)
    56
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Even though test was done on each @ TDC?

  7. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    753
    Thanks (Given)
    3
    Thanks (Received)
    4
    Likes (Given)
    6
    Likes (Received)
    18
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by bbezok View Post
    Even though test was done on each @ TDC?
    Yes, for sure. Do the port side clockwise and the starboard side counter-clockwise and you will see that your consistent differences go away.

  8. Thanks bbezok thanked for this post
    Likes bbezok liked this post
  9. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2018
    Location
    Maine/Ma
    Posts
    216
    Thanks (Given)
    78
    Thanks (Received)
    10
    Likes (Given)
    131
    Likes (Received)
    56
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'll try it that way first chance I have as well as the procedure Chris uses, just a bit leery on eating a ratchet handle......after all, they don't call them "on purposes".

  10. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    753
    Thanks (Given)
    3
    Thanks (Received)
    4
    Likes (Given)
    6
    Likes (Received)
    18
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by bbezok View Post
    I'll try it that way first chance I have as well as the procedure Chris uses, just a bit leery on eating a ratchet handle......after all, they don't call them "on purposes".
    The test does not need to be done at 100 PSI...................a lesser PSI will produce accurate results as long as your "math" is correct and the likelihood of having to visit a dentist after the test is greatly reduced................LOL

  11. Thanks bbezok thanked for this post
    Likes bbezok liked this post
  12. #9
    Join Date
    Apr 2018
    Location
    Maine/Ma
    Posts
    216
    Thanks (Given)
    78
    Thanks (Received)
    10
    Likes (Given)
    131
    Likes (Received)
    56
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    yes, I believe Chris said he does it @ 75lbs but I'm sure 50 will do.

  13. #10
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    minocqua, wis
    Posts
    3,557
    Thanks (Given)
    4
    Thanks (Received)
    79
    Likes (Given)
    306
    Likes (Received)
    503
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I like to turn flywheel and pump it towards tdc like Chris said then you can see the whole picture 50 psi x 2

  14. Likes bbezok liked this post
  15. #11
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    753
    Thanks (Given)
    3
    Thanks (Received)
    4
    Likes (Given)
    6
    Likes (Received)
    18
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by eli View Post
    I like to turn flywheel and pump it towards tdc like Chris said then you can see the whole picture 50 psi x 2
    Yes sir.....................50 PSI and taking the loss in pressure x 2 gives a good reliable reading. So if the loss is 2 PSI, the leakdown % is 4%.

  16. Thanks bbezok thanked for this post
    Likes bbezok liked this post
  17. #12
    Join Date
    Apr 2018
    Location
    Maine/Ma
    Posts
    216
    Thanks (Given)
    78
    Thanks (Received)
    10
    Likes (Given)
    131
    Likes (Received)
    56
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Thanks guys, really appreciate the info.

Similar Threads

  1. How to do leak down test on a 2.4 EFI
    By bridgeportguy in forum Technical Discussion
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 12-09-2017, 01:39 PM
  2. leak down test ?'s
    By boilerdawg in forum Technical Discussion
    Replies: 35
    Last Post: 06-08-2009, 08:00 AM
  3. Leak Down test
    By varmint2002 in forum Technical Discussion
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 05-30-2008, 01:04 AM
  4. Leak down test
    By marshan162 in forum Technical Discussion
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 06-07-2004, 06:15 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Frank Mole Transport