User Tag List

Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    28
    Thanks (Given)
    12
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Given)
    7
    Likes (Received)
    6
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Negative Squish Angle on 2 Stroke

    The original 3HP 2stroke Yamaha Malta does have a negative squish angle (I checked 5 of them)
    So it is not done by mistake from the Japanese. They wanted them like it is.
    I read that a negative squish angle in most cases does not make sense. But when it does make sense?

    Due to that i cant find an answer on internet i'll try and ask you guys!
    Does anybody know?

    TX

    Oliver

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Posts
    9,502
    Thanks (Given)
    23
    Thanks (Received)
    271
    Likes (Given)
    191
    Likes (Received)
    1976
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Might be for piston clearance....when piston rocks?

  3. Likes Instigator liked this post
  4. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Ontario
    Posts
    8,091
    Thanks (Given)
    205
    Thanks (Received)
    321
    Likes (Given)
    1921
    Likes (Received)
    2005
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    With taper opening to the center of the crown, likely tries to creates a tumble of the front. Minimum clearance on the the outside circumference would probably need to be even tighter. Just speculating .
    Did you measure the piston height verses the deck at TDC?

  5. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Cardington Ohio
    Posts
    19,689
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Great guess.
    Ive never heard of it.

    Makes zero sense in terms of power.

    Quote Originally Posted by Dave S View Post
    Might be for piston clearance....when piston rocks?
    I'd rather be competitive w/junk I built in my garage than win w/stuff I bought.


    I refuse to allow common sense to interfere w/my boat buying decisions.


    Checkmate 16' 140 Johnson
    Hydrostream 17' Vector FrankenRude I
    Laser 480 (?) 21' w/GT 200
    Glastron Carlson Conquest w/XP 2.6
    Glastron Carlson CVX 20 w/XP 2.6
    24' Sonic w/twin 250 Johnsons
    24' Sonic w/twin 250 HO Johnsons
    19' STV River Rocket w/FrankenRude II
    Allison XR 2002 w/Frankenrude II
    Hydrostream 18' V-King w/Frankenrude II

  6. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Missouri
    Posts
    1,212
    Thanks (Given)
    2
    Thanks (Received)
    66
    Likes (Given)
    12
    Likes (Received)
    83
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Some older motors have bifurcated pistons, to promote flow. Negative squish is the same idea.

    It it can be bad on a 4s but on two strokes it promotes flow out the exhaust to keep it from going out the intake.

  7. Thanks Instigator thanked for this post
    Likes Slimm, ostsideend liked this post
  8. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Palm City Fla
    Posts
    7,211
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    834
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    6513
    Mentioned
    13 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by ostsideend View Post
    The original 3HP 2stroke Yamaha Malta does have a negative squish angle (I checked 5 of them)
    So it is not done by mistake from the Japanese. They wanted them like it is.
    I read that a negative squish angle in most cases does not make sense. But when it does make sense?

    Due to that i cant find an answer on internet i'll try and ask you guys!
    Does anybody know?

    TX

    Oliver
    Yes, A negative squish angle will increase charge velocity in low compression, low horsepower, low RPM, applications like 3 hp Yamaha's, which would tend to foul spark plugs easier without it.

    Their thinking is, if you want more power ... buy a bigger motor ...

    If your dead set on building the baddest *(^$^&*&(% 3 horse on the planet ..
    then go 1 to 3 degrees positive . It will be less prone to detonation and will have a few hundred rpm over rev compared to a parallel squish/crown .

  9. Likes Instigator, Slimm, ostsideend liked this post
  10. #7
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    28
    Thanks (Given)
    12
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Given)
    7
    Likes (Received)
    6
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Thank you guys for your answers!
    i already changed one head to a small positive angle!

  11. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Palm City Fla
    Posts
    7,211
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    834
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    6513
    Mentioned
    13 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    That alone will lower compression. But it does open the door to cutting the head to raise compression not only to where it was before, but a little higher ( depending on gas quality ) to pick up a little power.

  12. Thanks ostsideend thanked for this post
    Likes Slimm liked this post
  13. #9
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    28
    Thanks (Given)
    12
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Given)
    7
    Likes (Received)
    6
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Fully agree. Head does give 11:1 ratio now. Fuel is 102 Oktane.
    When i found the negative angle, i thought the japanese have wide tolerances or the pre owner put in a different piston for some reason. Later i read about existing negative angle designs and could not explain it to myself.

    TX again!

Similar Threads

  1. squish angle help please
    By nz dave in forum Technical Discussion
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 05-24-2009, 09:59 AM
  2. Negative jack- 5 iches down- please help!!!
    By BASS-O-NOVA in forum Props, Setup, and Rigging
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 09-10-2008, 07:29 PM
  3. Float angle VS running angle ?
    By WATERWINGS in forum Technical Discussion
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 03-16-2007, 09:10 AM
  4. Trophy negative slip?
    By David in forum Props, Setup, and Rigging
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 05-31-2005, 06:58 PM
  5. Angle of attack VS trim angle?
    By Techno in forum Technical Discussion
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 03-03-2003, 09:00 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Aeromarine Research