User Tag List

Page 5 of 6 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 LastLast
Results 61 to 75 of 88
  1. #61
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Singapore/Melbourne/Italy
    Posts
    9,109
    Thanks (Given)
    1010
    Thanks (Received)
    356
    Likes (Given)
    4327
    Likes (Received)
    1976
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    A whipper snipper sounds better than a 4cyl 4s

  2. #62
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Mt. Laurel, N.J.
    Posts
    2,280
    Thanks (Given)
    1
    Thanks (Received)
    23
    Likes (Given)
    9
    Likes (Received)
    84
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    There were precious few cars that could take my little weed wacker hatchback from a roll.
    Azure AZ259, 8.1

  3. #63
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Location
    Miami
    Posts
    843
    Thanks (Given)
    30
    Thanks (Received)
    106
    Likes (Given)
    823
    Likes (Received)
    770
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by gotboostedvr6 View Post
    I had a built K24 in my 1999 Civic hatch. 260 whp

    It had very little torque under 4000 rpm.

    This one is being built with that in mind, plus quite a bit more power overall than that. Should have plenty.

  4. #64
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Gothenburg, Sweden
    Posts
    7,057
    Thanks (Given)
    143
    Thanks (Received)
    60
    Likes (Given)
    76
    Likes (Received)
    335
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by loop View Post
    probably a dumb question but are any of the 4 strokes pushrod motors and if not,why?
    Because we are in 2018.
    Markus' Performance Boating Links:
    www.toastedmarshmallow.com/performance

  5. Likes WavetoWave liked this post
  6. #65
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Galveston County,TEXAS
    Posts
    533
    Thanks (Given)
    44
    Thanks (Received)
    18
    Likes (Given)
    595
    Likes (Received)
    78
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Markus View Post
    Because we are in 2018.
    Is that really your best answer? Educate me on why it wouldnt work.
    dont get me wrong i am a huge fan of OHC motors. Especially a pneumatic valve 19,000 RPM F1 motor. I know a pushrod motor wouldnt be suitable for that but why wouldnt it work for a 6000rpm, 200hp 4 cylinder? Thats a 4 stroke i would consider buying. lightweight,simple,compact,durable
    limited skills

  7. #66
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Rhode Island
    Posts
    1,867
    Thanks (Given)
    27
    Thanks (Received)
    58
    Likes (Given)
    382
    Likes (Received)
    759
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    GM is the master of pushrod motors with their 4.8L, 5.3L, 6.0L, 6.2L, .... well we can just say all their V8's. Even the ZR1 is still a pushrod motor.

    I'd love to see some home-tuning software come out for the 4-strokes, as the auto market has EFI Live, and other programs like that.


    BY THE WAY - Anyone know of another lower unit that bolts to the 115 Pro XS?

  8. Likes loop liked this post
  9. #67
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Ontario
    Posts
    8,091
    Thanks (Given)
    205
    Thanks (Received)
    321
    Likes (Given)
    1921
    Likes (Received)
    2005
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Is the housing not different between the 2.07 and the other?

  10. #68
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Livingston, Louisiana
    Posts
    2,183
    Thanks (Given)
    76
    Thanks (Received)
    270
    Likes (Given)
    566
    Likes (Received)
    966
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    If I had to guess why no push rod motors, it would be for emissions. You have so much more ability to control emissions and still yet make gobs of power with a wider power curve with variable dual overhead cam timing where you can control exhaust and intake cam timing independently of each other allowing you to control valve overlap. Another bonus is this time of system allows you to totally eliminate the EGR system for controling NOX emissions

  11. #69
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Rhode Island
    Posts
    1,867
    Thanks (Given)
    27
    Thanks (Received)
    58
    Likes (Given)
    382
    Likes (Received)
    759
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by FORBESAUTO View Post
    If I had to guess why no push rod motors, it would be for emissions. You have so much more ability to control emissions and still yet make gobs of power with a wider power curve with variable dual overhead cam timing where you can control exhaust and intake cam timing independently of each other allowing you to control valve overlap. Another bonus is this time of system allows you to totally eliminate the EGR system for controling NOX emissions
    You know pushrod motors have variable valve timing also? My 2011 chevy Colorado with the 5.3L V8 has the variable valve timing. Some motors had the option of DOD (Displacement on Demand) which would shut 4 cylinders off and sip fuel. Unfortunately, they gave that option to the full-size trucks, and not my little Colorado (where it could have gotten 30mpg).

  12. #70
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Livingston, Louisiana
    Posts
    2,183
    Thanks (Given)
    76
    Thanks (Received)
    270
    Likes (Given)
    566
    Likes (Received)
    966
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    You are correct, but with one cam you’re only advancing and retarding valve timing and not able to change overlap. Being able to change the overlap is where the advantage is.

  13. #71
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Lufkin, Texas
    Posts
    2,642
    Thanks (Given)
    301
    Thanks (Received)
    275
    Likes (Given)
    1788
    Likes (Received)
    1265
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by loop View Post
    Is that really your best answer? Educate me on why it wouldnt work.
    dont get me wrong i am a huge fan of OHC motors. Especially a pneumatic valve 19,000 RPM F1 motor. I know a pushrod motor wouldnt be suitable for that but why wouldnt it work for a 6000rpm, 200hp 4 cylinder? Thats a 4 stroke i would consider buying. lightweight,simple,compact,durable
    A pushrod motor would work, but why? Pushrods are just an extra level of complexity. In a 8v 4 cylinder there are at least 16 moving parts eliminated by going OHC (pushrods and lifters). Once you go OHC, an 8v and 16v engine can share a common block. VVT is simpler, cam timing adjustments are simpler, everything is simpler when you don't have to worry about pushrods! It's all about being able to share common parts across a wide HP range of engines, lowering production costs, etc.

    As Bunky Knudson (or some GM exec) said, "parts left out cause no problems and cost no money!"
    Josh Peterson

  14. #72
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Galveston County,TEXAS
    Posts
    533
    Thanks (Given)
    44
    Thanks (Received)
    18
    Likes (Given)
    595
    Likes (Received)
    78
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by FORBESAUTO View Post
    If I had to guess why no push rod motors, it would be for emissions. You have so much more ability to control emissions and still yet make gobs of power with a wider power curve with variable dual overhead cam timing where you can control exhaust and intake cam timing independently of each other allowing you to control valve overlap. Another bonus is this time of system allows you to totally eliminate the EGR system for controling NOX emissions
    I dont doubt the advantages of variable valve timing and how its easier to do with OHC but its a system that adds complexity,weight,and costs. EGR valves have been on motors since the 1970's. Simple,inexpensive and effective.
    Chevrolet and Dodge both are proving pushrod motors to be just as efficient and powerful as their OHC competitors. I guess they havent heard its 2018...
    limited skills

  15. #73
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Livingston, Louisiana
    Posts
    2,183
    Thanks (Given)
    76
    Thanks (Received)
    270
    Likes (Given)
    566
    Likes (Received)
    966
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Emissions get more and more strict each year. A push rod design can only do so much and requires more pollution devices to be added to it to try and clean it up. The DOHC with variable valve timing is able to run so much cleaner without the added pollution devices. If a manufacturer is gonna spend all this time and money in R&D, why invest it in something that’s gonna get faded out because unable to meet emission requirements 5 years down the road?

  16. #74
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Gothenburg, Sweden
    Posts
    7,057
    Thanks (Given)
    143
    Thanks (Received)
    60
    Likes (Given)
    76
    Likes (Received)
    335
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by loop View Post
    Is that really your best answer? Educate me on why it wouldnt work.
    dont get me wrong i am a huge fan of OHC motors. Especially a pneumatic valve 19,000 RPM F1 motor. I know a pushrod motor wouldnt be suitable for that but why wouldnt it work for a 6000rpm, 200hp 4 cylinder? Thats a 4 stroke i would consider buying. lightweight,simple,compact,durable
    That was a serious answer. It is not that it wouldn't work, but it would not be worth the trouble to make it work.

    You don't see any clean sheet designs of pushrod engine/car combos, and very few clean sheet designs of pushrod engines. Where do you see new push rod engine designs is where they are needed for legacy packaging reasons, i.e. they are supposed to fit where another pushrod engine used to sit, i.e. at GM. There are no such packaging restrictions inside the cowling of an outboard engine.

    The 7 Marine has a max rpm of 6000, which is on the low side for an outboard application. If you want to run an engine at a sustained 6000-7000 rpm, you won't go with push rods if you have a choice. Now, you can make a pushrod engine rev high, but then it gets expensive to lighten the valve train.
    Markus' Performance Boating Links:
    www.toastedmarshmallow.com/performance

  17. #75
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Location
    Miami
    Posts
    843
    Thanks (Given)
    30
    Thanks (Received)
    106
    Likes (Given)
    823
    Likes (Received)
    770
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Block is sleeved, large bore piston from Wiseco, Saenz connecting rods. Custom ECU by Motec. Custom 4Piston cylinder head for this application.


Page 5 of 6 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. getting my new (to me) 29' Kryptonite tuned in
    By ray pampena in forum General Boating Discussion
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 03-25-2012, 06:37 AM
  2. 200 omc tuned?
    By stratos200vt in forum Four Stroke and Direct Injected Two Stroke Engines
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 04-02-2009, 12:45 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Chris Carson's Marine