User Tag List

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 40
  1. #16
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Ontario
    Posts
    8,091
    Thanks (Given)
    205
    Thanks (Received)
    321
    Likes (Given)
    1921
    Likes (Received)
    2005
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    BTW did you fit the rings in the bores and check end gaps at different bore heights? #s?
    Last edited by FMP; 04-22-2018 at 08:37 AM.

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Location
    fife scotland
    Posts
    444
    Thanks (Given)
    86
    Thanks (Received)
    16
    Likes (Given)
    116
    Likes (Received)
    35
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Yeah checked each hole in 3 different places. They were all with in spec, but still checked each set to the bore it was going in to. I was expecting some of them may have needed filed down but no all ok.

    I love my Bikini

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Ontario
    Posts
    8,091
    Thanks (Given)
    205
    Thanks (Received)
    321
    Likes (Given)
    1921
    Likes (Received)
    2005
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    How wide?

  4. #19
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Location
    fife scotland
    Posts
    444
    Thanks (Given)
    86
    Thanks (Received)
    16
    Likes (Given)
    116
    Likes (Received)
    35
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    If i mind right it was 0.020 mm

    I love my Bikini

  5. #20
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Ontario
    Posts
    8,091
    Thanks (Given)
    205
    Thanks (Received)
    321
    Likes (Given)
    1921
    Likes (Received)
    2005
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    " or mm? .00078" won't work lol
    You probably used SAE feeler gauge not metric. If it's metric and 0.2mm it's too big a gap. Consider up sizing rings .010" KD3510 if available and re fitting with filing after some simple dimension math to check how they should fit in your finished bore. Example a .010 ring will be so much longer resulting in a reduced end gap of x ".
    Last edited by FMP; 04-23-2018 at 09:14 AM.

  6. #21
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Location
    fife scotland
    Posts
    444
    Thanks (Given)
    86
    Thanks (Received)
    16
    Likes (Given)
    116
    Likes (Received)
    35
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I went with the wiseco spec

    I love my Bikini

  7. #22
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Ontario
    Posts
    8,091
    Thanks (Given)
    205
    Thanks (Received)
    321
    Likes (Given)
    1921
    Likes (Received)
    2005
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Okay but you're the guy who measured.

  8. #23
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Palm City Fla
    Posts
    7,211
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    834
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    6513
    Mentioned
    13 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    As 71v eluded to , stock carbs are generally pretty rich from the factory . Nothing you did was earth shattering , just a basic clean up of the passage ways .
    The main thing that has not been stated is that for the most part carburetor's are self compensating . Meaning , if you move more air thru them , they will meter more fuel .
    Unless your tune-up is out in left field , or did something to kill the signal , the only time you need to jet differently , is for changes in atmospheric conditions or the specific gravity of the fuel changes .


    So FuMP .... the guy has a 38 year old engine that got wounded .

    Standard bore .

    He hones it long enough , to get it good enough to go back together .

    And you put doubt in his mind that maybe he measured wrong and should have file fit a set of std rings ? Pppffftttttt

    Tell the truth ... you been pulse-huffin grape mmm crappie in your wig-wam all winter ...

  9. Thanks spybot thanked for this post
    Likes spybot liked this post
  10. #24
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Ontario
    Posts
    8,091
    Thanks (Given)
    205
    Thanks (Received)
    321
    Likes (Given)
    1921
    Likes (Received)
    2005
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    No , didn't say he should file fit standard rings, read it again. He has raised compression with cut hiC heads though. Good to hear from you.

  11. #25
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Venice, FL
    Posts
    1,370
    Thanks (Given)
    6
    Thanks (Received)
    19
    Likes (Given)
    132
    Likes (Received)
    131
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Chaz View Post
    As 71v eluded to , stock carbs are generally pretty rich from the factory . Nothing you did was earth shattering , just a basic clean up of the passage ways .
    The main thing that has not been stated is that for the most part carburetor's are self compensating . Meaning , if you move more air thru them , they will meter more fuel .
    Unless your tune-up is out in left field , or did something to kill the signal , the only time you need to jet differently , is for changes in atmospheric conditions or the specific gravity of the fuel changes .


    So FuMP .... the guy has a 38 year old engine that got wounded .

    Standard bore .

    He hones it long enough , to get it good enough to go back together .

    And you put doubt in his mind that maybe he measured wrong and should have file fit a set of std rings ? Pppffftttttt

    Tell the truth ... you been pulse-huffin grape mmm crappie in your wig-wam all winter ...
    Harrumpf! ...
    '71 Glastron V153 - Composite rebuild - Unceremoniously wrecked
    '81 Baja 15 SS - "nine-paged" '77 140
    '81 Carlson C500 Metric - Currently in foster care
    '70 something Speedcraft - Allison 16R clone - Undergoing restoration
    '79 Carlson CVZ 19 - Far back burner
    WALK TALL AND CARRY A BIG BILGE PUMP

  12. #26
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Ontario
    Posts
    8,091
    Thanks (Given)
    205
    Thanks (Received)
    321
    Likes (Given)
    1921
    Likes (Received)
    2005
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by 71V153 View Post
    Harrumpf! ...
    gesundheit

  13. #27
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Palm City Fla
    Posts
    7,211
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    834
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    6513
    Mentioned
    13 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by FMP View Post
    No , didn't say he should file fit standard rings, read it again. He has raised compression with cut hiC heads though. Good to hear from you.
    I didn't check behind your math , but now that I did look , as usual , your written text and math contradict each other . And yes , your incorrect ....... twice .

    Welp ... three times actually if you want to now count the heads statement .

    He never said he changed to a "Hi-Compression set of heads" .

    Part of his repair was :
    High Comp Heads Lapped

    As in .. making sure what he already had ...... was flat .

    FuMPsan ... wax on , wax off ! You may call me Mr. Miyagi



    Spybot , If you plan on doing any more of these in the future . Buy yourself a dial bore gauge off of e-bay . You can then quickly check the bore , top / bottom along the thrust face and then the same @ 90* to see if the hole is straight , tapered or if there is any egg shape to it . Then when you want to check ring gap , you can put an old ring in the second groove of a piston and use it as a squaring tool . Just set the new ring in the bore , slide the piston down till the old ring stops it , measure , move to the next hole ...

  14. Thanks spybot thanked for this post
    Likes spybot liked this post
  15. #28
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Location
    fife scotland
    Posts
    444
    Thanks (Given)
    86
    Thanks (Received)
    16
    Likes (Given)
    116
    Likes (Received)
    35
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by FMP View Post
    " or mm? .00078" won't work lol If it's metric and 0.2mm it's too big a gap.
    Are you saying the shop manual have given the wrong dimensions?

    Manual says Ring Gap max 0.43mm - 0.18mm min.

    If anything its closer to the min than max or at least thats what the factory manual dictates.
    Last edited by spybot; 04-24-2018 at 06:06 AM.

    I love my Bikini

  16. #29
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Ontario
    Posts
    8,091
    Thanks (Given)
    205
    Thanks (Received)
    321
    Likes (Given)
    1921
    Likes (Received)
    2005
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Heck no , that range is right. The high end is probably better with your pistons. Going to blame it on my eyes and this keypad, .02mm being too tight. That you would need to file.
    If you did have too big a gap .010 upping the rings and filing could work.
    Last edited by FMP; 04-24-2018 at 07:18 AM.

  17. #30
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Palm City Fla
    Posts
    7,211
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    834
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    6513
    Mentioned
    13 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Here's the easy way and it's darn near applicable to everything from lawn mowers to cylinders that you and I could walk around in .

    Five thousandths gap for every inch of bore .

    Five - ten - fifteen , an a half = " seventeen "

    .005 x 3.5 = .0175

    Then if you want to convert it to Chinese you'll find that it will fall just under a half a mm . So yes your .4x mm answer would be correct .

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Johnson V4 85 hp to MOD or Transform into 140hp
    By spybot in forum Technical Discussion
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 09-14-2017, 05:23 AM
  2. johnson v4 140hp 1988
    By racecar001 in forum Props, Setup, and Rigging
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 12-16-2012, 06:27 AM
  3. OMC Tech: 140hp Johnson No Top End
    By richcraft in forum Technical Discussion
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 05-24-2009, 11:17 AM
  4. Replies: 6
    Last Post: 01-20-2008, 05:30 PM
  5. forget the johnson 140hp
    By Huron in forum Technical Discussion
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 10-19-2007, 10:50 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •