User Tag List
Thanks: 0
Likes: 0
Results 1 to 15 of 15
-
06-25-2011, 06:36 PM #15000 RPM
- Join Date
- Nov 2005
- Location
- NE Alabama - Weiss Lake
- Posts
- 702
- Thanks (Given)
- 0
- Thanks (Received)
- 0
- Likes (Given)
- 0
- Likes (Received)
- 7
- Mentioned
- 0 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
4 Stroke Fuel Economy vs 2 Strokers
I am looking to repower my 18' Hydrodyne with twins and since I am a Merc guy I am looking at a pair of 150XS Optimaxes or a pair of Verados. I have a 225XS on one of my other boats and fuel economy is ok, and I have a 115 4 stroke on my pontoon boat which despite the inefficient hull design gets great mileage and is quiet.
Powerboat Reports did a shootout with 6 150's and my 2 candidates were in there but I have not been able to locate this report.
Bottom line - how much better is a Verado than a modern 2 stroke in fuel consumption?
Thanks in advance - TJTJ309
Older 17 foot Laser / 2.5L Merc 245 Racer
1993 Speedster 13 / 2019 Merc 60 play boat
2020 Lowe 24' Pontoon boat / 250hp Merc. 51mph!
72 Hydrodyne bubbledeck undergoing keel up restoration
2 Jetski's
-
06-25-2011, 08:55 PM #2
I think either motor is to heavy for a twin 18' boat. The 150 verado 510lbs,the150 opti 431lbs and up for more HP. I would look for a pair of EFI motors,or carb and save a lot of weight. The 150HP evinrude 418lbs. The merc motors with chrome or nickasil blocks I think are around 360lbs?
-
06-26-2011, 12:05 PM #3Member
- Join Date
- May 2011
- Location
- St. Augustine, FL
- Posts
- 44
- Thanks (Given)
- 0
- Thanks (Received)
- 0
- Likes (Given)
- 0
- Likes (Received)
- 0
- Mentioned
- 0 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
In my opinion a 2 stroke will always be better then a 4 stroke. If you are looking to get a 150 four stroke you are going to sacrifice hp and weight. Also of the DI 2 strokes the optimax is a little better on fuel then the Etec. The new DI 2 strokes are better on fuel then the four strokes at certain speeds not quite sure which speed because every boat is different. If you are looking for speed do yourself a favor and get the 2 stroke.
-
06-26-2011, 05:19 PM #4
I saw an article a few years ago in some bassboat magazine where they did a shootout between some 200hp 4strokes, and a 200hp Optimax. The 2-stroke optimax ran faster top end, had better acceleration, and got better fuel economy than the verado.
Ian
...boatless for now.
-
06-26-2011, 08:22 PM #55000 RPM
- Join Date
- Nov 2005
- Location
- NE Alabama - Weiss Lake
- Posts
- 702
- Thanks (Given)
- 0
- Thanks (Received)
- 0
- Likes (Given)
- 0
- Likes (Received)
- 7
- Mentioned
- 0 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
Good info - keep it coming and thanks. I am primarily interested in fuel economy and quietness. Ass heavy boats do not present a problem for me as I have overpowered many boats just like everyone else in this forum.
TJ309
Older 17 foot Laser / 2.5L Merc 245 Racer
1993 Speedster 13 / 2019 Merc 60 play boat
2020 Lowe 24' Pontoon boat / 250hp Merc. 51mph!
72 Hydrodyne bubbledeck undergoing keel up restoration
2 Jetski's
-
06-26-2011, 08:34 PM #6Member
- Join Date
- May 2011
- Location
- St. Augustine, FL
- Posts
- 44
- Thanks (Given)
- 0
- Thanks (Received)
- 0
- Likes (Given)
- 0
- Likes (Received)
- 0
- Mentioned
- 0 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
If I were going to buy any 150hp engine on the market today my first choice would be the 150HO Etec next would be the Optimax. 4 Strokes just don't have the balls a 2 Stroke does. Plus we will see what happens to the 4 strokes in the coming years because of EPA regulations they are having A LOT of problems with them. The Etec's will survive the upcoming changes.
-
06-27-2011, 05:46 PM #7
Well I was thinking from a water skiers point. That is a water ski boat? A ass heavy ski boat leaves a big hole in the water where it took off,when a barefooter hits that hole, during a deep water start,it is not fun. I have experinced it. That is why a Mastercraft puts the motor in the center of boat. Now if you have a boom it is not a issue,but then thats realy not barefooting is it.
-
06-29-2011, 10:31 PM #8Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2009
- Location
- De Soto, MO
- Posts
- 90
- Thanks (Given)
- 0
- Thanks (Received)
- 1
- Likes (Given)
- 0
- Likes (Received)
- 0
- Mentioned
- 0 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
My take from running the motors on twins. I would take the 4 strokes. They idle and cruise quieter and have more control that the 2 stroke in that range. Unless u are looking for all out top end then the 2 stroke wins in speed and fuel. The 4 does get louder a wfo, but is alot quieter at 5k on down. jmho. Merc told me the other day they are releasing a new 150 4stroke this fall. 3.0l inline 4 naturally aspirated. mech sift and throttle. supposed to be lightest in class.
-
07-01-2011, 12:24 AM #9
Merc needs a competitive 4 stroke to fill the gap between the F115 and the Verado 150.
I like the idea of a simple mech shift, normally aspirated 125, 135/140/150 fourstroke. I hope they can do it, and do it right. (they seriously need a much better standard control box for these engines...currently the shift quality is, well,.......shi__ty)
-
07-08-2011, 12:23 PM #106000 RPM
- Join Date
- Oct 2009
- Location
- Gonzales, La
- Posts
- 1,085
- Thanks (Given)
- 114
- Thanks (Received)
- 69
- Likes (Given)
- 218
- Likes (Received)
- 355
- Mentioned
- 0 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
"Trailer Boats" stated that 4-strokes will do way better than tranditional 2-strokes on fuel, wherease DI 2-strokes will do slightly better than 4-strokes. They've done quite a bit of fuel efficiency testings, so I believe them.
-
07-14-2011, 12:54 PM #11Banned
- Join Date
- Oct 2009
- Location
- cold lake
- Posts
- 165
- Thanks (Given)
- 0
- Thanks (Received)
- 0
- Likes (Given)
- 0
- Likes (Received)
- 0
- Mentioned
- 0 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
Think about all the hardware the 4 strokers are turning, camshafts, valves, springs, they use up energy AND add much weight which requires more energy again. D.I. 2 strokes benefit from the ability to produce a stratified charge near the plug-a fuel cloud surrounded by air, which provides more complete combustion than a sequentially injected homogenized charge 4 stroke can. As well, 2 strokes have lower thermodynamic losses under part throttle conditions than 4 strokes.
-
07-14-2011, 01:05 PM #125000 RPM
- Join Date
- Apr 2001
- Location
- Norway
- Posts
- 935
- Thanks (Given)
- 61
- Thanks (Received)
- 13
- Likes (Given)
- 354
- Likes (Received)
- 182
- Mentioned
- 0 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
Hi!
I have a 350 sci on my Phantom 25 (1985 model straight V, no noth) and I get 4,6 mpg at 4,000 rpms. At 3,500 rpms I get even better milage. A new world to me
Cheeers, Toffen
-
07-14-2011, 02:10 PM #13
The best I have got out of my Vegas XT with the 3.0 Looper and 27 SRX prop has been 3.5 MPG cruising at a constant 49mph at 4000rpms. The boat is mostly out of the water, and the RPM's are not that high. If I go slower, I actually get much less MPG....around 2.5 or so, I think it's mostly because the boat is plowing water...and the prop start to slip a lot.
Does anyone know what a typical 21foot bowrider with a 305 or 350 V8 gets? My friends have a 18' Fourwinns bowrider with a 4.6 Vortec V6....and they can cruise around all weekend and barely use any gas.....I wish I could do that!Ian
...boatless for now.
-
07-21-2011, 08:59 PM #147000 RPM
- Join Date
- Feb 2005
- Location
- seattle
- Posts
- 2,654
- Thanks (Given)
- 0
- Thanks (Received)
- 17
- Likes (Given)
- 0
- Likes (Received)
- 33
- Mentioned
- 2 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
i have a voyager [open bow vegas] with the full smartcraft guage set. i have gotten as high as 7.4 mpg using a 200xs merc. with your boat the 200xs or the 175xs would be worth consideration.
-
07-22-2011, 10:10 AM #155000 RPM
- Join Date
- May 2008
- Location
- Glen Spey, NY
- Posts
- 402
- Thanks (Given)
- 0
- Thanks (Received)
- 0
- Likes (Given)
- 0
- Likes (Received)
- 0
- Mentioned
- 0 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
Go with a two stroke if you want a good hole shot, top end and fuel economy. Hanging a heavy four stroke on the boat will change how the boat handles. I personally would go with an e-tec and then a merc . To give you an idea on two stroke efficiency I run a 22 velocity with an e-tec 225 h.o. and consistently average 6-7 mpg with playing and cruising figured in. Also as Rudeman put it the e-tec will meet more stringent epa regulations. As with any two stroke make sure you run good gas and atleast a semi-synthetic oil for long life. I think four strokes are fine for pontoon boats but not for the performance minded. Do yourself a favor and go for a ride with someone with an etec or an opti then ride in a four stroke boat and make up your mind I think you will agree with the comments..... Go 2-stroke.