User Tag List
Thanks: 0
Likes: 0
Results 1 to 4 of 4
Thread: '11 300XS weight
-
05-20-2011, 10:38 PM #1Platinum Team Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2003
- Location
- Discovery Bay, CA
- Posts
- 1,625
- Thanks (Given)
- 2
- Thanks (Received)
- 45
- Likes (Given)
- 9
- Likes (Received)
- 469
- Mentioned
- 1 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
'11 300XS weight
Mercury Racing's webpage and prior year placards I have seen for the 300XS w/ 20" mid list the weight at 505 lbs..........yet the placard on my '11 lists the weight as 501 lbs. Is the '11 actually 4 lbs lighter, or did Mercury run a bunch of misprinted placards? Not that the weight difference would make any difference whatsover, but I do find it interesting.
-
05-21-2011, 06:37 AM #2
Mine are 501 as well, the owners manual says 505 and if you have a torque master the book puts the weight at 480. It probably won't make much difference on your boat.
-
05-23-2011, 12:30 PM #35000 RPM
- Join Date
- Sep 2003
- Location
- Kansas
- Posts
- 392
- Thanks (Given)
- 0
- Thanks (Received)
- 0
- Likes (Given)
- 0
- Likes (Received)
- 1
- Mentioned
- 0 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
One of the things I miss about B&WB Magazine. They would do an actual weight of the motor VS what the companies stated the motor weight was. The big 3 (Merc, Yam and Rude) all stated their motors were lighter than they actually were. I would have to dig for it, but I think the 3.0L Opti's were actually like 518-520 something. and Merc was closer to their listed weight than the others were.
Allison XB2002 Comp Pro / 2.6L Yamaha 200 VMAX TRP
-
05-31-2011, 09:40 PM #4Screaming And Flying!
- Join Date
- Jul 2004
- Location
- Connecticut
- Posts
- 6,010
- Thanks (Given)
- 465
- Thanks (Received)
- 168
- Likes (Given)
- 911
- Likes (Received)
- 951
- Mentioned
- 1 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
Yep, you really have to hang 'em from the meat hook, with a lower unit full of lube and full of fluids