User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3
Results 31 to 38 of 38
  1. #31
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Hamilton Ohio
    Posts
    3,743
    Thanks (Given)
    15
    Thanks (Received)
    11
    Likes (Given)
    30
    Likes (Received)
    98
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Good question.......




    Gary

    Growing old is inevitable, growing up is optional.......

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    El Cajon CA.
    Posts
    1,037
    Thanks (Given)
    1
    Thanks (Received)
    7
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    37
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    4-6 mph

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Palm City Fla
    Posts
    7,211
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    834
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    6513
    Mentioned
    13 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by mrcrsr View Post
    i just wonder for all the expense involved(those cranks aren't common and you'd probably have to buy new) is it really worth it for 200 cc's? maybe the money would be better spent in porting/crankcase improvements? i'd like to see a dyno run between 2 identical engines w/ the stroke increase being the only thing changed

    Thats a really good question . As we know it's all the little things that add up to the total package. In this case it's a little smaller gain than advertized.
    A 3.0 litre is actually 3032 cc / 185 ci ... 92 x 76 / 3.630 x 3
    A 3.2 litre is actually 3160 cc / 193 ci ... 92 x 79 / 3.630 x 3.118
    So in a shooting from the hip calculation of 300 hp from 185 ci , or 1.62 hp per ci and barring nothing else changing except for adding 128 cc / 8 ci .. I see it as having the ability to produce 13 hp more .. or just over 2 hp per cyl .
    Without sitting down and plotting it out with a degree wheel . I would say that by leaving the pistons alone and taking half ( aprox .060) of the additional stroke out of the head , in essence you are killing the port timing of an already lazy map. I would think it would be wiser to cut the crown of the piston and bring the port floor down to the piston at BDC . This would in esence increase the size of the port but still keep the timing events closer to the factory specs. Unless you plan on spraying it , then the ring will respond quicker to pressure diferential as well .. ( I dont hear too much about vert or lat gas ports on outboards ? )
    Is it worth the money ( crank, machine work, normal parts, r+r ) .. for 13 hp .. ? I guess only the guy opening his wallet can answer that. Is 13 hp worth 4-6 mph as Eric sugguests .. ? I cant answer that .. but I do know to make my car pick up a tenth and about 7 mph in the quarter it took over 150 hp .. but then thats making a move from the low 190's to bust 200 mph ..
    I think a better bank for the buck would be to come up with a set of rods that will live to 8k and then bring the rest of the stuff along to support power at that level ... I know .. the last move would be to put the big crank in there too .. after it's been offset ground ...

    Charlie ... II

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    684
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I"M not sure about all that , all I know I gave Shaun Torrente a pair of 225 HP 3 Litres that will be 375 HP when I get them back next week . Yes Gas prices are crazy and think about looking for pair DFI Powerheads

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    port st. lucie, fl
    Posts
    5,737
    Thanks (Given)
    18
    Thanks (Received)
    51
    Likes (Given)
    657
    Likes (Received)
    491
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    good point, it definetely throws the port timing off, bringing the rpm range down w/o changing the timing. you'd definetely have to use the degree wheel to figure that out. i know w/ mine i've already picked up 12 mph over the stock 250 efi, w/ all the mods to the engine i've done, and started w/ a 1000$ core,which i could imagine the crank alone costs that or more, but i never ran a 300x on my boat to do a fair comparison, and i probably will gain another 7 plus mph once i finish tuning the wolf, and i have another 3 litre on the bench that i'm going to modify further that started as a blown up optimax that i got for next to nothing, i think i'd rather spend that money on the wolf ecu, this weekend i managed to do a 91 mile run, and burned 28 gallons doing it, which is better then my 2.5 ever got on this boat, and we cruised at 75 mph and ran 90 mph many times, thats slitely over 3 mpg
    Last edited by mrcrsr; 04-20-2011 at 06:29 AM.
    action mobile marine, 772 528 0754, dealers for aces fuel products,wolf efi, pro marine,latham and gaffrig/livorsi. we build gearcases and modify them(3 litre) to ratchet, and powerheads as well. 21 skater/3 litre wolf efi 113 mph the engine build http://www.screamandfly.com/showthre...-3-litre-build

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    684
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Very nice !!

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    South America
    Posts
    5
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by mrcrsr View Post
    good point, it definetely throws the port timing off, bringing the rpm range down w/o changing the timing. you'd definetely have to use the degree wheel to figure that out. i know w/ mine i've already picked up 12 mph over the stock 250 efi, w/ all the mods to the engine i've done, and started w/ a 1000$ core,which i could imagine the crank alone costs that or more, but i never ran a 300x on my boat to do a fair comparison, and i probably will gain another 7 plus mph once i finish tuning the wolf, and i have another 3 litre on the bench that i'm going to modify further that started as a blown up optimax that i got for next to nothing, i think i'd rather spend that money on the wolf ecu, this weekend i managed to do a 91 mile run, and burned 28 gallons doing it, which is better then my 2.5 ever got on this boat, and we cruised at 75 mph and ran 90 mph many times, thats slitely over 3 mpg

    Which mods did you do to the stock 250 to gain 12mph?

  8. #38
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    South America
    Posts
    5
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Simon View Post
    4-6 mph
    Hey Simon, I have some questions for you about 3.0L engines,

    I have 2 250 efi lastest model and I would like to do some upgrades to them for higher Hp, If I put some 300x C16 heads on, what are the pros and cons of doing it, and also what else do I need to change from stock rather than carbon fiber reeds in order to made them work fine and "safely". is it worthy? and how much more hp should I get with those heads.
    Can I also swap stock ecu's for 300x ones?
    Right now both engines are arround 120psi in all cylinders. C15 original heads

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Aeromarine Research