User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 16
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Mass
    Posts
    450
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    16
    Likes (Given)
    1
    Likes (Received)
    39
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    early Xflow gearcase ratios

    I have an OMC 73 135hp gear case and a 73 115hp gear case. do these two lowers have the same gear ratio or different? i checked the gear part numbers and they are all different. logic would indicate if their different the 135 would have the numerically lower gear ratio. is that correct? anyone have a list of gear case ratios by year and HP size for 70's Xflows?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Lake Coochiching, Ontario
    Posts
    7,753
    Thanks (Given)
    23
    Thanks (Received)
    271
    Likes (Given)
    485
    Likes (Received)
    1571
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The oldest brochure i have is 1978. All V4s were 2:1 that year.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Ontario, New York
    Posts
    1,522
    Thanks (Given)
    2
    Thanks (Received)
    7
    Likes (Given)
    11
    Likes (Received)
    25
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I just looked in our 73' service manuals and and they should be the same (2:1)... but the books technically say the 85hp and 135hp are 13:26 and the 115hp is 13:25, I bet its a typo... and should be 13:26 like the rest...
    Dan Cario

    1994 STV Mod-VP w/225HO Ficht Evinrude
    1987 22' Velocity w/225HO Evinrude E-Tec

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Virginia Beach
    Posts
    3,260
    Thanks (Given)
    23
    Thanks (Received)
    14
    Likes (Given)
    65
    Likes (Received)
    130
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    the oiler-style units on the 135 were 1.92:1 (13:25)...

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Mass
    Posts
    450
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    16
    Likes (Given)
    1
    Likes (Received)
    39
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    whats an oiler style unit? how do you account for the gear sets having different part numbers for the 135 and 115?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Key Largo, Fl
    Posts
    3,272
    Thanks (Given)
    8
    Thanks (Received)
    215
    Likes (Given)
    30
    Likes (Received)
    585
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    An oiler unit is called so because it uses an oil pump run off the forward gear to power the shift mechanism,this unit,1973-1976,was properly called 'powershift',the 85 had a 4 spline driveshaft,the 135 had 20 splines,most likely thats where the gear differences came from,chris

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Minocqua
    Posts
    97
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    3
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    3
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    When I started at Evinrude way back in '68. And when the 1969's came out, all V-4 crossflows where 2:1 from that point on.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Mass
    Posts
    450
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    16
    Likes (Given)
    1
    Likes (Received)
    39
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    well thanks guys. I just went and checked out both cases. the 135 unit does in fact have a 1.92:1 ratio. I marked both shafts and props and spun the props. the 135 unit was consistently less than 2 turns of the drive shaft for 1 turn of the prop checked visually by my marks. the 115 unit was dead on at 2:1

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Virginia Beach
    Posts
    3,260
    Thanks (Given)
    23
    Thanks (Received)
    14
    Likes (Given)
    65
    Likes (Received)
    130
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    From 73-76 the 135s all had 1.92:1 gears. The 77 140 had them too, but used a newer style case with swept skeg. The 1978 140s changed to a non-oil-pump unit and 2:1 gears, and they stayed that way until the end of the crossflow V4 production.

    Tiger

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Mass
    Posts
    450
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    16
    Likes (Given)
    1
    Likes (Received)
    39
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    good to know glad i figured this out. i had been using the 115hp 2:1 unit on my boat previous. the 1.92:1 will give me better prop selection turning a smaller pitch faster is easier than getting a bigger pitch some times with the small gear case.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Singapore/Melbourne/Italy
    Posts
    9,109
    Thanks (Given)
    1010
    Thanks (Received)
    356
    Likes (Given)
    4327
    Likes (Received)
    1976
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by JWTjr. View Post
    From 73-76 the 135s all had 1.92:1 gears. The 77 140 had them too, but used a newer style case with swept skeg. The 1978 140s changed to a non-oil-pump unit and 2:1 gears, and they stayed that way until the end of the crossflow V4 production.

    Tiger
    Correct
    in a light boat they were faster and with the huge compression ratio and short induction they had tons of torque
    Last edited by powerabout; 11-16-2010 at 08:59 AM.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    peterborough
    Posts
    1,295
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Umassot50 View Post
    good to know glad i figured this out. i had been using the 115hp 2:1 unit on my boat previous. the 1.92:1 will give me better prop selection turning a smaller pitch faster is easier than getting a bigger pitch some times with the small gear case.
    HI. Myself I really don,t think .08 per revolution will amount to anything significant thanks.
    free spirit / ONTARIO, CANADA.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Mass
    Posts
    450
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    16
    Likes (Given)
    1
    Likes (Received)
    39
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    right its not much, but it will decide which gearcase i rebuild and LWP cone over the winter for a project

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    peterborough
    Posts
    1,295
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Umassot50 View Post
    right its not much, but it will decide which gearcase i rebuild and LWP cone over the winter for a project
    I forgot to add if they are different in spline count, 13 is best and knowingly prop selection thanks.
    free spirit / ONTARIO, CANADA.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Minocqua
    Posts
    97
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    3
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    3
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    MMMMMMMMMM 1.92 ratio on the 135's, well I've been wwwwrong before. But I can't remember is the second or third time??????

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Aeromarine Research