User Tag List

Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 80
  1. #16
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Celina, Ohio
    Posts
    2,856
    Thanks (Given)
    13
    Thanks (Received)
    123
    Likes (Given)
    69
    Likes (Received)
    693
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    You forgot the Rotory. I think it was 1 liter making 900 horse!
    2005 APR FORMULA 2 ROOKIE OF THE YEAR

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Atlantic Beach, FL
    Posts
    1,282
    Thanks (Given)
    2
    Thanks (Received)
    10
    Likes (Given)
    1
    Likes (Received)
    67
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Don't make them too mad Rich. We truly want them to come play with us in October. It is an absolute fact, that there might be a rumor, that Johnny Sanders will attend.

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Annapolis, MD ragboat capital of the world
    Posts
    11,463
    Thanks (Given)
    591
    Thanks (Received)
    164
    Likes (Given)
    2428
    Likes (Received)
    445
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    This thread is actually a rehash

    Steve is correct, Merc claimed the 1250 Super BP was 140 hp without stacks and 155 with.

    I've never come across any quotes for the 1000 BP or the pre-Super 1250 BP, but Rich's estimates seem reasonable.

    Merc did not claim any top end increase for the silo Twister ... they said it was the same 155hp as the 1250 Super BP but had more low end torque and that put it around the course faster.

    Merc never quoted a power figure on the T2, but did say the T2X was "capable of" excess of 200 hp. 201 is in excess of 200.

    The first OMC V-4 race motors were rated at 116.2 hp. Those were the 89ci X-115 and GT-115. The next OMC motors were 10ci bigger but still carried the "115" names. Either Leek or Strang told me these were 125-130 hp.

    During the Strangler/Stinger and Super/GP era there were no published hp figures, but a few years later a handicapping scheme was set up in Mod 100 where the various 99ci V-4 and inline 99ci raced together. They dyno'ed several of each motor that were assumed to be typical and not special team motors. The lowest guys on the totem pole were the Stranglers and Stingers at about 165, so they got the lightest weight.

    Next inline was the T2 at about 170-175

    Then the Super Strangler/Stinger GP at 180-185

    And the top dog 99 ci racer was the 190-195ish T2X

    Early T-3's had a hard time passing the T2X's so I'd agree with Rich's estimates.

    The only other motors I've seen numbers on were the T-4's with the numbers Rich gives. Jim Nerstrom may have given us some numbers on the 727 V-6's over on BRF, but I don't recall what the numbers were ... and they weren't production motors like the others mentioned. In fact, many of the motors Rich mentions were not production motors and had a lot of variation from motor to motor.

  4. #19
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Atlantic Beach, FL
    Posts
    1,282
    Thanks (Given)
    2
    Thanks (Received)
    10
    Likes (Given)
    1
    Likes (Received)
    67
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by T2x View Post
    Those would have been the later engines....... maybe they were 140 hp each......... or not.....

    Willabee could say for sure as he was the only one on here privvy to the real numbers........

    I will say that 80 mph in some offshore hulls back then always looked slower to me when I passed them in my dual Eltro hull at 70 mph with 10-15 mph to spare..... maybe the offshore horsepower was factored to justify the alleged speeds....rather than vice versa......
    Rich - AMEN! The following is copied directly from my first post on the "Lake X in the 60s" thread.

    If there is one thing I have learned in my life as a former boat racer, fisherman and fighter pilot; it is that boat racers, fishermen and fighter pilots are the greatest liars in the world. I especially know that is true about boat racers because we would always run every race boat through the measured kilo at Lake X many times as we tried new things and as Don Schwebbs banged on our props. We always knew exactly how fast our boats were running before we left the lake. The only significant variables were fuel loads, water conditions and whether we were running in salt water. SOOOOO...you would not believe how many times somebody at a race site would tell me that they were running at 75mph and I would walk past them in an absolute 62mph boat.

  5. #20
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Atlantic Beach, FL
    Posts
    1,282
    Thanks (Given)
    2
    Thanks (Received)
    10
    Likes (Given)
    1
    Likes (Received)
    67
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Sam & Rich - As usual, seems like I always forget ONE WORD (at least)..In this case, it was SUPER 1250 BPs.

  6. #21
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Middle USA
    Posts
    1,439
    Thanks (Given)
    8
    Thanks (Received)
    16
    Likes (Given)
    51
    Likes (Received)
    39
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    All this info is awesome! This is what I like to read!.

  7. #22
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Keswick, Ontario
    Posts
    593
    Thanks (Given)
    101
    Thanks (Received)
    111
    Likes (Given)
    449
    Likes (Received)
    282
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Mark75H View Post
    The first OMC V-4 race motors were rated at 116.2 hp. Those were the 89ci X-115 and GT-115. The next OMC motors were 10ci bigger but still carried the "115" names. Either Leek or Strang told me these were 125-130 hp.
    In 1969 & 1970 OMC's big production motors were 96.1 c.i. @ 115hp.
    In 1971 they went to 99.6 c.i. @ 125hp.
    Not sure, but would this mean that Scotti used a pair of 96 c.i. engines to win the 1969 OWC, not 99.6's ?
    I think the first OMC V6's were actually 122 c.i. (2 L) but these blocks never made it as production engines. The production V6's were 149 c.i. then 160 c.i. and I think both of these were also the displacement for some of the OMC V6 racing engines (ie; Evinrude CCC). I think OMC also had a 183 c.i. (3L) V6 racing engines.
    I think the production V8's started as 3.6L and then went to 4.0L, but most if not all the racing V8's were 3.6's.

  8. #23
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    peoria il
    Posts
    364
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    17
    Likes (Given)
    2
    Likes (Received)
    137
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Wasnt a 1250 super BP a early version of the 1350 with the new style transfer port covers.
    The main diferance being the 1350 has the cast in lower starter mount.
    Dale

  9. #24
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Granite Quarry, NC
    Posts
    4,012
    Thanks (Given)
    5
    Thanks (Received)
    35
    Likes (Given)
    29
    Likes (Received)
    85
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Watermark View Post
    Awe, come on now Rich, just think of your highest Grade School marks - C C C ..
    So does that make a V-4 a "cee cee"?

    Seriously Mark..... after you joined the "dark side" your judgement has been severely impaired on engines.....

    I have some bad news for you however.....even Darth Vador finally saw the light.
    Last edited by T2x; 03-11-2010 at 08:09 AM.
    20 Foot Switzer Wing 2 X S3000 (Dust'n the Wind II)
    !6 foot Wood Eltro Vee (2X Merc 1500's) (Dust'n the Wind IV)
    15 foot Powercat 15C (2 X Merc 1500) (Dust'n the Wind III)
    (Single engine boats are lacking something)
    15’ Wooden Switzer Shooting Star...
    16 foot Lee Craft Merc S 3000-(Gold Dust II)
    (The exception proves the rule)
    Obsolete and Proud of it

  10. #25
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Granite Quarry, NC
    Posts
    4,012
    Thanks (Given)
    5
    Thanks (Received)
    35
    Likes (Given)
    29
    Likes (Received)
    85
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by largecar91 View Post
    You forgot the Rotory.
    No I didn't...the Rotary was AKA the Wankel.......

    T2x
    20 Foot Switzer Wing 2 X S3000 (Dust'n the Wind II)
    !6 foot Wood Eltro Vee (2X Merc 1500's) (Dust'n the Wind IV)
    15 foot Powercat 15C (2 X Merc 1500) (Dust'n the Wind III)
    (Single engine boats are lacking something)
    15’ Wooden Switzer Shooting Star...
    16 foot Lee Craft Merc S 3000-(Gold Dust II)
    (The exception proves the rule)
    Obsolete and Proud of it

  11. #26
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Annapolis, MD ragboat capital of the world
    Posts
    11,463
    Thanks (Given)
    591
    Thanks (Received)
    164
    Likes (Given)
    2428
    Likes (Received)
    445
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by peterse90 View Post
    In 1969 & 1970 OMC's big production motors were 96.1 c.i. @ 115hp.
    In 1971 they went to 99.6 c.i. @ 125hp.
    Not sure, but would this mean that Scotti used a pair of 96 c.i. engines to win the 1969 OWC, not 99.6's ?
    I think the first OMC V6's were actually 122 c.i. (2 L) but these blocks never made it as production engines. The production V6's were 149 c.i. then 160 c.i. and I think both of these were also the displacement for some of the OMC V6 racing engines (ie; Evinrude CCC). I think OMC also had a 183 c.i. (3L) V6 racing engines.
    I think the production V8's started as 3.6L and then went to 4.0L, but most if not all the racing V8's were 3.6's.
    A quick check of the tech specs usually answers a lot of questions ...



    OMC applied to make race motors of 3 different sizes for 69 & 70

    92ci ... which would have been exactly 1500cc's, the maximum allowed in Europe until '69 or '70, and giving them a 3ci advantage over the Mercs

    96ci ... which would have been based on their next production motors

    and

    99ci ... based on future production production motors and the same size as Merc's inline 6's, released for racing in the fall of 1968 ... several years before the production motors were made this size

    I've never seen anyone comment on having any of the H or J series motors ... H's may have only been used in Europe in 1969 and the J's may not have actually been made. The surviving versions of these motors that I know of are all K series KT and KR, I've never heard of the KS

    I'm pretty sure Ron Hill has said Leek provided them 99ci motors for Havasu '68 with instructions not to open them ... which Russ Sr ignored and ended up with the longest surviving 99ci V-4's in the race .... APBA's "racing year" runs from November 1 of the previous year thru October of the current year, so the traditional Thanksgiving race counts for points in the next year and is run under the next calendar year's rules.

  12. Likes FMP liked this post
  13. #27
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Annapolis, MD ragboat capital of the world
    Posts
    11,463
    Thanks (Given)
    591
    Thanks (Received)
    164
    Likes (Given)
    2428
    Likes (Received)
    445
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by T2x View Post
    So does that make a V-4 a "cee cee"?
    CC was used on the European Evinrude Mod 50 triple

  14. #28
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Sunbury, Pa
    Posts
    7,350
    Thanks (Given)
    9
    Thanks (Received)
    29
    Likes (Given)
    112
    Likes (Received)
    212
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by peterse90 View Post
    In 1969 & 1970 OMC's big production motors were 96.1 c.i. @ 115hp.
    In 1971 they went to 99.6 c.i. @ 125hp.
    Not sure, but would this mean that Scotti used a pair of 96 c.i. engines to win the 1969 OWC, not 99.6's ?
    I think the first OMC V6's were actually 122 c.i. (2 L) but these blocks never made it as production engines. The production V6's were 149 c.i. then 160 c.i. and I think both of these were also the displacement for some of the OMC V6 racing engines (ie; Evinrude CCC). I think OMC also had a 183 c.i. (3L) V6 racing engines.
    I think the production V8's started as 3.6L and then went to 4.0L, but most if not all the racing V8's were 3.6's.
    The racing V8's were 3.5. Entirely different motrs then the 3.6 and 4.0


    Ralph Musser
    27' Fountain Fever W/ 525SC
    22' Rapid Craft W/ Evinrude 300 V8 January 2009 BOAT OF THE MONTH SOLD
    24' Triton 240 Gold W/ Mercury 60
    14' Royalcraft W/ Evinrude 75 father/daughter project

  15. #29
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Annapolis, MD ragboat capital of the world
    Posts
    11,463
    Thanks (Given)
    591
    Thanks (Received)
    164
    Likes (Given)
    2428
    Likes (Received)
    445
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)
    Not all the racing V-8's were 3.5's. They were different sizes different years. I can quote the sizes and years later.

  16. #30
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Keswick, Ontario
    Posts
    593
    Thanks (Given)
    101
    Thanks (Received)
    111
    Likes (Given)
    449
    Likes (Received)
    282
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Thumbs up

    Quote Originally Posted by Mark75H View Post
    A quick check of the tech specs usually answers a lot of questions ...


    99ci ... based on future production production motors and the same size as Merc's inline 6's, released for racing in the fall of 1968 ... several years before the production motors were made this size

    I've never seen anyone comment on having any of the H or J series motors ... H's may have only been used in Europe in 1969 and the J's may not have actually been made. The surviving versions of these motors that I know of are all K series KT and KR, I've never heard of the KS

    I'm pretty sure Ron Hill has said Leek provided them 99ci motors for Havasu '68 with instructions not to open them ... which Russ Sr ignored and ended up with the longest surviving 99ci V-4's in the race .... APBA's "racing year" runs from November 1 of the previous year thru October of the current year, so the traditional Thanksgiving race counts for points in the next year and is run under the next calendar year's rules.
    Great explanation and excellent information as always!

Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Chris Carson's Marine