User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    10
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    ADVICE ON PROPELLER PITCH vs CUP

    I need some advice on propeller pitch vs. cup.
    I own a 1959 Glasspar G-3 powered by a 1978 Johnson 75hp short
    shaft “Stinger” motor. Nitro gear housing.

    I had been running a reworked Michigan Wheel
    Stainless Steel propeller, reworked from 15” pitch to 16” and a little
    cup added. RPM’s max’d out at 6000rpms. I was happy with
    hole shot and top end. About 44MPH.

    I added a CMC PT130 for trim & tilt and raised the motor up
    an additional 1”. My RPM’s jumped up to 6500 RPMs when fully
    trimmed up. I also gained 2.5 to 3 MPH. Hole shot was even better
    due to the trim & tilt. Problem now was too high RPM’s.

    I had the propeller shop (same one that reworked the 15” to 16” change)
    add an additional 1” pitch and add additional cup to the propeller. My logic
    was 200 rpm for the additional 1” pitch and 200 rpm for the additional cup.
    When I boat tested the adjusted propeller, the boat would not
    plane off without laying over the front deck, motor trimmed down.
    When on plane, RPM’s dropped to 5500 rpm at full throttle with motor fully trimmed up.
    Speed went down 4 MPH. So it’s back to the propeller shop.

    My questions are: What has more influence on hole shot, Pitch or Cup?
    What has more influence on top end, Pitch or Cup?

    Should I have the propeller shop remove pitch or cup or both?

    I would like to have the performance near or better than with
    the CMC unit installed and the 16” pitch prop. and get the
    RPM’s near 6000rpm.

    Thanks for your help and advice

    John

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Florida most of the time
    Posts
    1,037
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    if im following right you had 2 inch pitch added ?? which is a lot to a stock prop . Id say your problem is Pitch .Id say if you took the cupping off you may get some speed back at the cost of grip, Take the 1 inch of pitch off and it should be happy days

    It is a thin line to balance when you are nearing the limit of performance .You need a combination of both ,you then need to see how much cavitation you have (grip) vs top speed .

    Here are some figure i ran on a job this week for a kids race boat .

    11inch solas stock no cupping 41.5mph no grip sluggish out of hole and lots of cavitation
    11inch with cup 37 mph better out of hole good grip .
    10 1/4 cut 3/4 inch pitch out left the cupping ,good out of hole ,good grip 40mph. Game over

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Noblesville IN
    Posts
    233
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    John,
    Its JM from Indiana, I think your in the right place ,Now we need MORE info. Maybe we can find some X racers of this motor from the ol J class.
    8' invader,18hp evinrude@31mph
    14' 50's rowboat,alumacraft FD
    13.7 Glasspar g3,85hp merc@56mph
    14' cobra,1250 merc@66mph
    15' custom craft 5pt.hydro
    13.7 C/D G3,75hp McCulloch
    15' GW invader torpedo tunnel
    Jmevinrude youtube channel

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Lakes Region NH
    Posts
    6,627
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I would leave the cup and take out the pitch
    the pitch will restore your planing issue and a bit more cup that you added will give a tiny bit more loss of the rpm you are looking for....... you may also try to raise the motor a bit before trying any of this......


    all that being said I would have just run the motor at 6500 with a little extra oil it shouldn't hurt it a bit........

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Holland
    Posts
    180
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Arent those stinger engines built to run 7k rpms? they are not stock engines.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    29
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The manual says 5800. I run mine at 6600, it doesn't seem to bother it much.
    The problem with these motors is too little torque at low RPM.
    Mine runs at standard hight (cav plate 1" above bottem) 50MPH with one on board. Put 3 people in it and it wont go on plane. So for usability keep pitch low and RPM high


    My neighbour who used to race these motors in t-850 (in the Netherlands) claims running them at 7k doesn't pose a problem. But they didn't mind rebuilding em....

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    10
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    It sounds like Pitch is the answer to my question and solution
    to my current performance problem. I’ve now got too much for
    this boat and normal load.

    I’ll get it back to the propeller shop and discuss it with them.

    I’m glad to hear that a lot of 49.7 cu. in. 3 cylinder OMC
    owners run them in the mid 6000 rpm range. Maybe I should have
    left well enough alone.

    Thanks for the replies guys!!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Chris Carson's Marine