User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Results 1 to 14 of 14
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Whittier, ca
    Posts
    15
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    ????what carb????

    i have a 350 hp 455, got my hands on a old torker intake and need to know what carb will work good on it. it currently has a stock intake manifold and a rochester quadrajet. thank you very much.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    FL
    Posts
    345
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    750 Holley

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Washington N.C.
    Posts
    2,154
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by 455maveric View Post
    750 Holley




  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Tulsa,Ok
    Posts
    573
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    A good tuned Q-jet is reliable, they are 750CFM, some 850, people give them a bad name because they don't know how to tune them, I think Holley's are a pain, love to leak and flood, just my .02

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Orlando.FL
    Posts
    122
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Edelbrock 750, simple,no leaks, will run right out of the box.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Huffman, Texas
    Posts
    985
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Holley/ Edelbrock you will get the ol ford vs chavy opinions. Both good carbs IMO the Edelbrock is a little more user friendly. Bies is right about your q-jet.
    Good luck!
    Look fear in the eyes and laugh!
    If you're here to have a good time, enjoy yourself.
    If you're here to be a grammar whore, troll, or arrogant nit picker then please leave now!


    79' Allison GT-20
    V4 OMC

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Whittier, ca
    Posts
    15
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    going with a holley 3310 750 cfm vacuum secondary. i think it will run alot harder and get better fuel mileage. thanks for your help

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Avondale,AZ
    Posts
    96
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Bad idea, use an 800 or 850 dp holley, the larger primaries allow a reasonable cruise speed without the secondaries being open. With the primaries and secondaries partially both open, but at differing amounts, the mixture distribution suffers as does power and fuel mileage. IMHO the Q-jet is the worst jetboat carb in this regard. The front cylinders will tend to pull fuel from the small primaries at a high velocity, and the back cylinders will pull fuel at a low velocity from those huge secondaries. This upsets the balance of mixure and flow, thats why you can sometimes feel a vibration at cuise that goes away at full throttle. Part throttle secondary metering is dependent on the taper of the metering rods and hanger height which varies with wear and poor quality rebuilding. Put a Q-jet on a flow bench at part throttle and use a directional pitot and cotton tuft indicator and you will never use a Q-jet again except in an economy situation. We like to use the HP 920 on even mostly stock jets because it will allow a faster part throttle cruise. We like to also use a dominator carb with modified secondary linkage for the same reason. My 21 Daytona with the 572 would run about 78 on the primaries and got better fuel economy than the 454 it replaced. It could also pull a much larger impeller too. Again, this is my opinion, yours may vary. 1TIMINATOR

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Northern ILL.
    Posts
    611
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Given)
    1
    Likes (Received)
    5
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    850 DP very hard to over carb a jet boat
    79 Southwind Tunnel Dragster 540ci BBC

    UMPBA 926 Gas Jet

    My Projects http://s200.photobucket.com/user/Dir...?sort=3&page=1

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Chandler Arizona
    Posts
    2,053
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by 1TIMINATOR View Post
    Bad idea, use an 800 or 850 dp holley, the larger primaries allow a reasonable cruise speed without the secondaries being open. With the primaries and secondaries partially both open, but at differing amounts, the mixture distribution suffers as does power and fuel mileage. IMHO the Q-jet is the worst jetboat carb in this regard. The front cylinders will tend to pull fuel from the small primaries at a high velocity, and the back cylinders will pull fuel at a low velocity from those huge secondaries. This upsets the balance of mixure and flow, thats why you can sometimes feel a vibration at cuise that goes away at full throttle. Part throttle secondary metering is dependent on the taper of the metering rods and hanger height which varies with wear and poor quality rebuilding. Put a Q-jet on a flow bench at part throttle and use a directional pitot and cotton tuft indicator and you will never use a Q-jet again except in an economy situation. We like to use the HP 920 on even mostly stock jets because it will allow a faster part throttle cruise. We like to also use a dominator carb with modified secondary linkage for the same reason. My 21 Daytona with the 572 would run about 78 on the primaries and got better fuel economy than the 454 it replaced. It could also pull a much larger impeller too. Again, this is my opinion, yours may vary. 1TIMINATOR


    You can take this info to the BANK, Tim knows his shiat.








    Silhouette II Racing

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    New England
    Posts
    17
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    My Eliminator has a stock 454 and Quadrajet. While it runs well overall, there is a definite hesitation when getting onto plane and again when accelerating from 3000 rpm. You can get through it by pumping the pedal a bit, or it will smooth out in a few seconds, but still needs to be fixed.

    My last boat, with 455 Olds and 750 Holley mechanical secondaries, was smooth as could be at any speed, any rpm. So, I'm in the same situation as 76Cheetah, do I rebuild the Qjet and see if I can smooth it out, or go to the 750 or 850 Holley. After running both I'm leaning toward the mechanical secondaries over vacuum, just seems more predictable, but then again I don't want to burn a ton more fuel either.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Tulsa,Ok
    Posts
    573
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Tighten the secondary air valve, the hesitation comes from opening the air valve to soon, this pulls the needles out of the secondary jets and is like flushing the pot. This is usually why people call them quadrabogs. There is a small screw that hold a spring.
    This adjustment is in any carb kit, or get me the serial number on yours and I can look up the adjustment. It is about like setting an automatic choke.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Avondale,AZ
    Posts
    96
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Also the choke pulloff pod on the opposite side of the throttle is used as a "shock absorber"/slow down device to slow the secondary opening rate. It has about a .020 restrictor in the vacuum tube that the short hose fits onto. Remove the hose (is the hose in good condition?), and fully compress the pod link, put your finger over the vacuum hose barb and verify that it will hold vacuum for at least 30-45 seconds without bleeding off. If it bleeds off replace it before you do any changes that you are not sure of. If the pod holds vac ok, then firmly depress the pod again (without your finger over the barb)and see how long it takes to fully extend. It should take about 10 sec to fully extend. Go to a parts store and play with a new pod and get familiar with its operation before deciding to replace the old one. There is more than one pod application.The sec spring can get softer, but it won't make an immediate difference, only the pod failure or linkage falling off will do that. The pod does NOT have to be removed from the carb to do these tests. Also, there is a spec for the pod linkage compression holding the sec airvalve closed. Often these problems start when someone decides to remove the choke for a performance gain and doesn't realize that the pod must stay. Some dragracers remove the pod and compensate by tightening the airvalve spring, but that only works well in a fully open or closed condition as in racing. Call me if you have any questions during business hrs at 623-877-8553 if you have any questions. TIMM

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    New England
    Posts
    17
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Bies and Timm, thanks for the suggestions. I'll take a look in a few days when I get time to work on the boat and let you know what I find.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Frank Mole Transport