User Tag List
Results 31 to 45 of 60
-
03-27-2009, 09:22 AM #31
While I'm not famaliar with the housing with the water ports, the T2 did use a number of different housings. The differed in the exhaust tube lengths and water dump. I had one that dumped water directly into the exhaust at the adapter plate right at #6. To prevent any water intrusion I welded it shut and drilled holes downward in the cavity to allow water to dump inside the housing without going into the exhaust right at the powerhead. This way everything cooled yet no water in the PH.
I believe what they were trying to do was similar to water injection tuning, since the tube on those cylinders was so short, hence no tuning.
It didn't make any difference either way running a XS powerhead on the T2 mid.Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level, then beat you with experience.
3 X APBA Formula V Nat'l Champion
APBA Formula V US-1
It took me 29 years to become an overnight success.
-
03-27-2009, 09:23 AM #325000 RPM
- Join Date
- Nov 2003
- Location
- Va. Beach, Va.
- Posts
- 158
- Thanks (Given)
- 0
- Thanks (Received)
- 5
- Likes (Given)
- 0
- Likes (Received)
- 8
- Mentioned
- 0 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
Unless my memory has failed me AGAIN the T2's didn't have the power port in the side of the piston. If this is true you could probably run the '75 and OLDER 1150 pistons, which would have the high domes you're looking for
-
03-29-2009, 11:02 AM #33
Some follow up pictures and some new questions...
Extra housing.... no fitting BUT it did have a small hole ( 1/16" ) tru the housing .
This is the housing from my T2, hole inside the fitting are ? 3/16" .... Where did this hose go or come from ??
Xtra housing + the T2 on the right .... was this BIG hole from the factory ??.
( the long tuner ends just above the hole )
And now a new question...
The baffle plate in the middle are from my T2, the one on the right came in a box with the T2 ( not for the T2 I know ), take a close look at the bottom.... bout are cut down some , same mechanic probably did bout ?, as the came from the same place ? .
The baffle plate to the right are unmolested..
This picture shows bout T2 baffle plates....
I think I know WHY the baffle plate was cut down some, uncut it would NOT be possible to bolt it down to the dsh ( would hit the steel plate for the pan ).
So my question would be, should there be a distance plate between powerhead and drive shaft housing ?? , a 1/4" plate should do the job ? ( shaped like the gasket between PH and DSH ) .
The outer cover was cut down too, will probably make a new one as it looks so diy ...
A parts manual for the T2 would have been nice ....
Arne KjetilMy engines :
Johnson V4m-10s 90 hp 1964,from the prosess.
Mercury TII, next project
True story ??:-)
-
03-31-2009, 02:53 AM #345000 RPM
- Join Date
- Mar 2006
- Location
- auckland new zealand
- Posts
- 655
- Thanks (Given)
- 3
- Thanks (Received)
- 9
- Likes (Given)
- 6
- Likes (Received)
- 13
- Mentioned
- 0 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
i do know of sum brand new inline 6 tower of power blocks if twister block is the same
-
03-31-2009, 01:06 PM #35
Probably same casting, but different machining ( bigger ports and more of them... ), the front from the T2 will be a direct bolt on to the 1972 140hp + 1973 > 1979 ( 90 > 150 hp ) block, but ...
Picture of the underside of the block with the pans fit....well doesn't fit .
Also taken from underneath the pan.....someone wasn't sober when they fitted this pan, everything are way of ...lots of space on starboard side...less than nothing on port side...
Well figured out the problem, should be an easy but time consuming fix.
Arne KjetilLast edited by Droll; 03-31-2009 at 02:39 PM.
My engines :
Johnson V4m-10s 90 hp 1964,from the prosess.
Mercury TII, next project
True story ??:-)
-
03-31-2009, 08:06 PM #36Screaming And Flying!
- Join Date
- Dec 2001
- Posts
- 9,502
- Thanks (Given)
- 23
- Thanks (Received)
- 271
- Likes (Given)
- 191
- Likes (Received)
- 1976
- Mentioned
- 0 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
HeeHee
What kind of glove is that..... high temp for hot exhaust.
-
04-18-2009, 06:41 PM #37
You see the white stuff on the ground ?? it's cold
Ran into a little problem with one of the carbs today ....
This is definitely not good , old damage, looks like corrosion..
But thankfully the rest of the carbs were good.
Anyone got any ideas about how to fix, or are the only option to find some replacements ??,
Arne KjetilMy engines :
Johnson V4m-10s 90 hp 1964,from the prosess.
Mercury TII, next project
True story ??:-)
-
04-18-2009, 06:54 PM #38
-
07-19-2009, 07:31 AM #39
Found myself 3 carbs some time ago....
Some new questions...
Front prop shaft bearing ( the roller bearing just behind the nose cone ) are there any other bearing # for this bearing?, other than the 31-38681A1 ??
Reason for this asking... planing to use a later model SSM ( still "classic" super ) and want to replace some of the bearings since I had to open it up anyway....
Got the parts manual for the old SSM, but there are some minor changes ... this later model uses a slightly different prop shaft ( longer splines, same length as the SSM VI ) and therefor requires a slightly modified bearing ( still same Timken ( cone #HM81649 + cup #HM81610 ) bearing but modified ).
Are this the same bearing as used on the later SSM VI ?? (#31-35924T1 )
The differences between old and new bearing...
- Old bearing are a stock Timken cone #HM81649 + cup #HM81610
- New bearing uses the same Timken bearings, BUT the cone got an enlarged hole half way true ( to make room for the splines )
Arne KjetilMy engines :
Johnson V4m-10s 90 hp 1964,from the prosess.
Mercury TII, next project
True story ??:-)
-
07-19-2009, 07:40 AM #40
You may be asking questions that only someone like Steckbauer would know
-
07-19-2009, 07:57 AM #41
To simplify the question some.... can the bearing used on the later SSM ( still super ) be bought or does the bearing have to be modified by me.
Left one are from the later SSM, right one are a stock bearing used on the early SSM units.
Any reason for this change ??, did they have some problems with the original way ??
Arne KjetilMy engines :
Johnson V4m-10s 90 hp 1964,from the prosess.
Mercury TII, next project
True story ??:-)
-
08-06-2009, 12:01 PM #42
Got some new questions....
What's the story about the casting at the end of the arrow in the picture, since they made the casting they probably got some idea about it ??
And now a more serious question....
In this picture I have mounted the Speedmaster I probably gonna use, it's a bit newer model..and it got less holes in it ( don't want the engine to be unusable noisy ), some pictures of the unit that came with the T2 here. ( holes in front needs to be welded since they does weaken the housing ( already cracked.. )..
Plan to block the BIG hole on the leg ( removable plate ), would this hurt the performance ?? .
Plan to weld some of these holes too, just leave the 2 at the top ??
And last, a simple one...
Length of the driveshaft ABOVE leg/adapter ...
Arne KjetilMy engines :
Johnson V4m-10s 90 hp 1964,from the prosess.
Mercury TII, next project
True story ??:-)
-
08-06-2009, 02:17 PM #43
I wouldn't think it'd hurt it. The gearcase adapter plate still has what's probably adequate exhaust relief itself, and so does the gearcase. Where you're gonna find the problem is getting the boat on top. The T2's are pretty boggy off idle anyway, being SUPER over carbed combined with the efficiency/non slip of the Speedmaster & prop, and that's where the extra exhaust relief is real helpful...................... gettin' on top.
Along the same lines, I never could tell any difference top end whatsoever between an offshore and std. leg on V6 engines, but the difference in off plane acceleration was substantial.Membership upgrade options: http://www.screamandfly.com/payments.php
-
08-06-2009, 02:21 PM #44
That may not be so simple. There're two different thicknesses of Speedmaster adapters that look almost identical. I think there's about 3/4 inch difference between the two, and have bought T2's with both thicknesses, but DO think it was originally a T1 to T2 type difference............. just don't remember which originally came on which. One of 'em will take a std 1500XS gearcase with it's production length driveshaft and the other won't.
Membership upgrade options: http://www.screamandfly.com/payments.php
-
08-06-2009, 02:47 PM #45
I know , that's why I asked about the shaft height ABOVE leg.....
The adapter I got mounted are 3-3/4", also got a 2-7/8" adapter..
With the 3-3/4" adapter I got 1.5" of the shaft above the leg top ( minus pan plate and 2 gasket... )
One of 'em will take a std 1500XS gearcase
Arne KjetilMy engines :
Johnson V4m-10s 90 hp 1964,from the prosess.
Mercury TII, next project
True story ??:-)