User Tag List
Results 1 to 15 of 60
-
11-13-2008, 03:53 PM #1
Some Twister II questions, rest. project..
Got myself a restoration project for the winter/next summer, therefore I got some questions....
First some pictures....
First question: Compression.... does this engine got any higher comp. than a regular inline, if so... how did they manage to do so ??
- Same stroke as the other inlines
- Same length on the rods ??
- Same block as some other inline engines ( different port map thou )
- Pistons ??, some differences from the std inline..( rings ++ )
Reason for my question.....my engine had been stored in a barn for some time, and a friend of the previous owner needed some parts for his 1500....
So I need some rods and 6 pistons.....planing to use some high dome 3 ring pistons ( recommended by one of the inline gurus here , Jeff G ) + late style inline rods ( cracked style )
Would my choice in parts give any disadvantages ?? any change in the engines comp. ??
Also thinking about it's fuel recommendations, could this engine run on pump gas ?? we got 95 ( link to tech sheet ) And 98 ( link to tech sheet ) lead free...no more,no less.....
Retard timing I know
Next question....are looking for some steering bars, or if anyone could provide a drawing/pattern I could make some.....
Would like to get it restored back to a running engine, if so it will be used ( NOT abused )
Probably got more questions later
Arne KjetilMy engines :
Johnson V4m-10s 90 hp 1964,from the prosess.
Mercury TII, next project
True story ??:-)
-
11-13-2008, 03:56 PM #2
Send me a e-mail, I'll trace some OEM bars for ya.
Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level, then beat you with experience.
3 X APBA Formula V Nat'l Champion
APBA Formula V US-1
It took me 29 years to become an overnight success.
-
11-13-2008, 05:37 PM #3
I am sure Jeff will answer most of your questions but blocks are different, cranks have different firing order. Pistons came in various configurations. Porting was different between stock engine plus it was different between T2's depending on if it was stock or a team motor or was ported by a privateer. I think the 3 ring pistons are the way to go. I am just about done with a pair of T2X's and I used 3 ring pistons. They will be good for durability and like you I will not run these 2 engines to their peak RPM's so they should be fairly reliable. I also have a spare set of bars.
2005 APR FORMULA 2 ROOKIE OF THE YEAR
-
11-14-2008, 12:31 AM #4
After they are machined yes, but they used the same raw casting on other non Twisters too ( mine got the casting number 852 5033, some info here
cranks have different firing order
Pistons came in various configurations.
Porting was different between stock engine plus it was different between T2's depending on if it was stock or a team motor or was ported by a privateer
Arne KjetilMy engines :
Johnson V4m-10s 90 hp 1964,from the prosess.
Mercury TII, next project
True story ??:-)
-
03-22-2009, 12:22 PM #5
This picture are from the port side of my T2, under the pan ( lots of holes, covered by duck tape....), found a fitting with a cut of hose ...
Picture shows the location for the fitting, what's inside here ?, high pressure water/water dump ?, did the hose go into the cowl tru the hole above ? if so ? where to/from ??
Factory or someones mod ??
Got another T2 driveshaft housing too, whitout this fitting.
Powerhead was separated from the rest when I got the engine....therfore I don't know anything about this spesific engine .
Arne KjetilMy engines :
Johnson V4m-10s 90 hp 1964,from the prosess.
Mercury TII, next project
True story ??:-)
-
03-22-2009, 03:22 PM #6
Unless my memory has failed me AGAIN the T2's didn't have the power port in the side of the piston. If this is true you could probably run the '75 and OLDER 1150 pistons, which would have the high domes you're looking for.
I'm not absolutely sure about the power port, (haven't been in one since the '70's) but just thought I'd throw it out for discussion so you can check before you start ordering parts.Membership upgrade options: http://www.screamandfly.com/payments.php
-
03-22-2009, 04:18 PM #7
-
03-22-2009, 06:56 PM #85000 RPM
- Join Date
- Oct 2001
- Location
- Brunswick,Ga
- Posts
- 362
- Thanks (Given)
- 0
- Thanks (Received)
- 0
- Likes (Given)
- 0
- Likes (Received)
- 0
- Mentioned
- 0 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
The T2 is where the power port originated. That is the reason for the third transfer port window, to match the power port. Not sure what is available in pistons anymore, I haven't researched it for a few years. I would recommend using three ring pistons for general use.
I'm still looking through notes as I have time, trying to find an answer to your water fitting question. I think it was added to some of the later motors, but I don't remember why.Last edited by LightNBug; 03-22-2009 at 07:03 PM. Reason: forgot first time
-
03-23-2009, 08:19 AM #95000 RPM
- Join Date
- Oct 2001
- Location
- Brunswick,Ga
- Posts
- 362
- Thanks (Given)
- 0
- Thanks (Received)
- 0
- Likes (Given)
- 0
- Likes (Received)
- 0
- Mentioned
- 0 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
Water outlet:
I found some notes on this but they are not real clear. It seems this fitting was added to have a dump path for water that was going into the exhaust. Looks like I tried different size fittings here as well as restrictors in the bottom exhaust adaptor where the water dumped. I ended with a 5/16" opening in the bottom plate and a 1/8" fitting coming out the side. What I don't remember is if the normal overboard fitting was blocked or left open. I think it was left as normal. Hope this helps. If I find more info I'll let you know.
-
03-23-2009, 02:22 PM #10
Got the same answerer from another inline guru here on S&F, he told me this was basically the same as the power ports used on the production engines ( different way to skin the cat .. ).
His advice was to use 3-ring high dome PP pistons .
Nice BIG holes , the middle hole was probably lowered to make a better spread of the air/fuel.... for better cooling of the pistons... some extra hp was only a bonus.
Add this and we got a nice directed flow...got a little file job on this one old damage, all cylinders are fine .
All info does help , so this was a simple way to cool the tuner/housing ....OK this gives me the direction of the water flow...next question would be from where...
Haven't looked for any fitting on the block/covers yet but there should be one ?
Only fitting I have seen was located high up on the exhaust cover, assumed this was for the tell tale...will look closer next time I am out there...
Could this "mod" tell anything about the year produced, I am might consider this T2 to be a later model ??
- This water mod
- 2 tube carbs
- Double fasting of it's cowl ( rubber hold down + pins on the top.. )
But then the "Circle C" block...might tell another story....( only got the same casting, porting are T2 )
Biggest problem...solved , this one threatened the whole restoration project but now it's all good..
My crankshaft.... nice
Same crankshaft, some $ later..... he might regret he took the job, but it sure looks nice ... a BIG to David at Marine Crankshaft .
Anyone got anything on these ??, found them at the bottom of one of the parts boxes I got together with the T2.... no prize for telling me they are for the T2/T2x , probably only used on the earliest models ??
Arne KjetilMy engines :
Johnson V4m-10s 90 hp 1964,from the prosess.
Mercury TII, next project
True story ??:-)
-
03-23-2009, 03:07 PM #115000 RPM
- Join Date
- Oct 2001
- Location
- Brunswick,Ga
- Posts
- 362
- Thanks (Given)
- 0
- Thanks (Received)
- 0
- Likes (Given)
- 0
- Likes (Received)
- 0
- Mentioned
- 0 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
Seed rakes??
Never saw anything like the seed rake looking gizmos. Looks like the same screw pattern as the reed blocks. Maybe some type reed stop??
The purpose of the water fitting was not to get water to cool the exhaust, rather to stop water from going into exhaust. A early idea for "dry stacking". If you look at the water flow you should see that it dumps into the exhaust housing from the cavity where the fitting comes out. The idea was to block off the dump into the housing and give another exit point so the water could still flow and not cause an overheat. I found that if all water was blocked from entering the exhaust housing everything in there would melt including the water pump. That's the reason I had a restrictor in the dump cavity to restrict flow but not stop it. For what it's worth, I never saw any advantage. My advice would be to block off the fitting, but be sure water dump inside cavity is open.
-
03-23-2009, 04:49 PM #12
I have a C6 at home and they do not use stops like that.
2005 APR FORMULA 2 ROOKIE OF THE YEAR
-
03-23-2009, 04:51 PM #13
I'm seein' something on your crankshaft that I don't like UNLESS the picture is fooling me. How 'bout postin' another one showing the main bearing journal BELOW the _1 rod throw, or even a pic of the whole crank.
Incidentally, of the 3 T2's I have now, and the 2 others I had in the past, I've never seen the fitting on the mid. Don't know if that means all my stuff was earlier, or if it was a mod later.
I'm gonna take my bore scope to work tomorrow and look in one of the T2 powerheads for the power port. I sure wuz thinkin' they didn't have em.Membership upgrade options: http://www.screamandfly.com/payments.php
-
03-23-2009, 05:26 PM #14
Or a big image here, What do you see ??, making me worry at bit here... I might know what you thinking about, but it should not be a problem ( got a dog )..
Incidentally, of the 3 T2's I have now, and the 2 others I had in the past, I've never seen the fitting on the mid. Don't know if that means all my stuff was earlier, or if it was a mod later.
I have a C6 at home and they do not use stops like that.Never saw anything like the seed rake looking gizmos. Looks like the same screw pattern as the reed blocks. Maybe some type reed stop??
Arne KjetilMy engines :
Johnson V4m-10s 90 hp 1964,from the prosess.
Mercury TII, next project
True story ??:-)
-
03-23-2009, 06:28 PM #155000 RPM
- Join Date
- Oct 2001
- Location
- Brunswick,Ga
- Posts
- 362
- Thanks (Given)
- 0
- Thanks (Received)
- 0
- Likes (Given)
- 0
- Likes (Received)
- 0
- Mentioned
- 0 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
If you are referring to the bottom picture of the lower pan as pertains to the water fitting, it looks like it could be part of the same set-up.