User Tag List

Page 28 of 49 FirstFirst ... 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 LastLast
Results 406 to 420 of 726

Thread: Merc V6 History

  1. #406
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    37,836
    Thanks (Given)
    64
    Thanks (Received)
    1667
    Likes (Given)
    337
    Likes (Received)
    19217
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

  2. #407
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Pickett, WI
    Posts
    210
    Thanks (Given)
    19
    Thanks (Received)
    86
    Likes (Given)
    362
    Likes (Received)
    210
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by FUJIMO View Post
    I see!! Widened the exh. port a lot requiring bridge to support the rings. Thanx Fujimo.

  3. #408
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    37,836
    Thanks (Given)
    64
    Thanks (Received)
    1667
    Likes (Given)
    337
    Likes (Received)
    19217
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Jerry, Above is a photo of one of the older 2.4 Bridgeport cylinders... Its simply a bridge design in the exhaust port, that provided ring support, in an exhaust port that was too big to support the rings travel. As you can see in the photo, there was always a bit too much scuffing in that bridge area, and so therefore Bridgeports of that era had shorter lifespans. But, they worked. They produced the power. When they first came out, I went through dozen's of them the first couple months, in the Offshore version. I would say that 3 out of 4 of them tripped rings within the first hour of running. If one didn't break in the first hour, it lasted forever. Weird, but true. Merc Hi-Perf got it together after a 100 or so engines went out & the start-up failures came to a halt.
    Last edited by FUJIMO; 02-08-2017 at 06:37 PM.

  4. #409
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    37,836
    Thanks (Given)
    64
    Thanks (Received)
    1667
    Likes (Given)
    337
    Likes (Received)
    19217
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    ...1986 2.4 Mod-VP(Carb) Hi-Performance Division Block...

  5. Thanks Kitch thanked for this post
  6. #410
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    37,836
    Thanks (Given)
    64
    Thanks (Received)
    1667
    Likes (Given)
    337
    Likes (Received)
    19217
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    They take your original great design Jerry...and Mod the hell out of it these days......This particular block was highly modified by a fellow named Jim Ruck, who was a retired machinist & engineer from Mercury Marine... He recently fully retired, finally.
    Last edited by FUJIMO; 02-08-2017 at 07:23 PM.

  7. Thanks Kitch thanked for this post
    Likes Jamie Nichols, mrcrsr liked this post
  8. #411
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Edgewater,B.C. CANADA
    Posts
    8,259
    Thanks (Given)
    179
    Thanks (Received)
    321
    Likes (Given)
    3578
    Likes (Received)
    1236
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by FUJIMO View Post
    Jerry, Above is a photo of one of the older 2.4 Bridgeport cylinders... Its simply a bridge design in the exhaust port, that provided ring support, in an exhaust port that was too big to support the rings travel. As you can see in the photo, there was always a bit too much scuffing in that bridge area, and so therefore Bridgeports of that era had shorter lifespans. But, they worked. They produced the power. When they first came out, I went through dozen's of them the first couple months, in the Offshore version. I would say that 3 out of 4 of them tripped rings within the first hour of running. If one didn't break in the first hour, it lasted forever. Weird, but true. Merc Hi-Perf got it together after a 100 or so engines went out & the start-up failures came to a halt.
    Before the skirts were cut to cool the bridge?

    Dave
    1980 Cougar 19 tunnel,90 2.4L Bridgeport EFI in middle of restoration.
    1988 BAJA Sunsport 186, 96 225 Pro Max
    79 12' Auminum, 95 Merc 9.9
    RIP Stu
    "So many idiots, so few bullets"

  9. #412
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Pickett, WI
    Posts
    210
    Thanks (Given)
    19
    Thanks (Received)
    86
    Likes (Given)
    362
    Likes (Received)
    210
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by FUJIMO View Post
    Jerry, Above is a photo of one of the older 2.4 Bridgeport cylinders... Its simply a bridge design in the exhaust port, that provided ring support, in an exhaust port that was too big to support the rings travel. As you can see in the photo, there was always a bit too much scuffing in that bridge area, and so therefore Bridgeports of that era had shorter lifespans. But, they worked. They produced the power. When they first came out, I went through dozen's of them the first couple months, in the Offshore version. I would say that 3 out of 4 of them tripped rings within the first hour of running. If one didn't break in the first hour, it lasted forever. Weird, but true. Merc Hi-Perf got it together after a 100 or so engines went out & the start-up failures came to a halt.
    What did Merc Hi-Perf do to solve the problem?

  10. #413
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Pickett, WI
    Posts
    210
    Thanks (Given)
    19
    Thanks (Received)
    86
    Likes (Given)
    362
    Likes (Received)
    210
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by FUJIMO View Post
    They take your original great design Jerry...and Mod the hell out of it these days......This particular block was highly modified by a fellow named Jim Ruck, who was a retired machinist & engineer from Mercury Marine... He recently fully retired, finally.
    I remember Jim Ruck! I think he worked at plt.6 back when I did. -- It looks like two more boost ports were added to help the breathing. Getting rid of those thick iron liners gave a lot of extra room for porting and bore increases. In a way it's a good thing I was forced to use those liners in the original engine --- otherwise I might have designed everything a lot closer together and you wouldn't have had the room to do what you're doing today.

  11. Thanks W2F a V-King, Kitch thanked for this post
    Likes powerabout, W2F a V-King, tgreen, Kitch liked this post
  12. #414
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Ontario
    Posts
    8,091
    Thanks (Given)
    205
    Thanks (Received)
    321
    Likes (Given)
    1921
    Likes (Received)
    2005
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I apologize for my ignorance , is Jim Ruck a member? Know of his machine shop in WI .
    Last edited by FMP; 02-08-2017 at 10:08 PM.

  13. #415
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    15,422
    Thanks (Given)
    214
    Thanks (Received)
    475
    Likes (Given)
    7697
    Likes (Received)
    4259
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Funny how the chest cuts mimic what Jerry had done originally.

  14. #416
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Singapore/Melbourne/Italy
    Posts
    9,109
    Thanks (Given)
    1010
    Thanks (Received)
    356
    Likes (Given)
    4327
    Likes (Received)
    1976
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Capt.Insane-o View Post
    Funny how the chest cuts mimic what Jerry had done originally.
    I'm guessing that it was too hard to do with dies so it has to be milled and that is way too much work for a production block

  15. #417
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    2,105
    Thanks (Given)
    126
    Thanks (Received)
    245
    Likes (Given)
    128
    Likes (Received)
    687
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Testing ....

    Quote Originally Posted by FUJIMO View Post
    ...... When they first came out, I went through dozen's of them the first couple months, in the Offshore version. I would say that 3 out of 4 of them tripped rings within the first hour of running. If one didn't break in the first hour, it lasted forever. Weird, but true. Merc Hi-Perf got it together after a 100 or so engines went out & the start-up failures came to a halt.
    Fujimo, fill in some blanks for me please ..... when, where and how did you break in (or simply break ) these motors?

  16. #418
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Pickett, WI
    Posts
    210
    Thanks (Given)
    19
    Thanks (Received)
    86
    Likes (Given)
    362
    Likes (Received)
    210
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Have the rod bearings and center mains been increased in capacity to keep up with the power increases?

  17. #419
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    15,422
    Thanks (Given)
    214
    Thanks (Received)
    475
    Likes (Given)
    7697
    Likes (Received)
    4259
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    The rod bearings are the same...the center mains changed to a different style. The later race motors use a upper main bearing similar to the lower main.

  18. Likes Dave Strong liked this post
  19. #420
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Pickett, WI
    Posts
    210
    Thanks (Given)
    19
    Thanks (Received)
    86
    Likes (Given)
    362
    Likes (Received)
    210
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Capt.Insane-o View Post
    The rod bearings are the same...the center mains changed to a different style. The later race motors use a upper main bearing similar to the lower main.
    I'm surprised those original rod bearings can hack it with the greater loads and speeds. But I assume for the race engines, at least, they get changed every so often to preclude failure during a race.
    By a different style center main do you mean steel cages instead of plastic?
    So those race motors have a ball bearing on top now? That's different. Do both bearings float now like the inline engines or is the crank still locked by the bottom main and just the top main floats?

Page 28 of 49 FirstFirst ... 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Chris Carson's Marine