User Tag List
Thanks: 0
Likes: 0
Results 16 to 30 of 99
Thread: OptiMax JP
-
03-20-2006, 12:41 PM #165000 RPM
- Join Date
- Jul 2003
- Location
- Wisconsin
- Posts
- 367
- Thanks (Given)
- 0
- Thanks (Received)
- 0
- Likes (Given)
- 0
- Likes (Received)
- 1
- Mentioned
- 0 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
Originally Posted by 150aintenuff
The JP was not built for the military on a contract. It was developed, built, and offered to government agencies as is. The military has gone away from expensive contracts in many areas and now likes to buy "off the shelf."
-
03-20-2006, 03:28 PM #17
still has to meet a certain specification though even if it is off the shelf..
preignition can occure in any engine if not tuned properly regardless of compression ratio however with that said just because knock can occur doesnot meant that that engine is meeting its HP potential when it begins to over knock and ping... if that were the case then you wouldnt see any V6's over 135 hp.. they can knock and ping just as much as any 280 can.. my point was that there is ALOT of HP potential left that could be extracted out of that motor if it were designed strictly for that usage.. which it is not.. its a werk motor which is built to last through abuse... that was my point..
4-16-2014. 25 years old today... the fishin boat doesnt look to bad for a classic does she
things that were are no longer as they are today...
-
03-21-2006, 07:41 AM #185000 RPM
- Join Date
- Jul 2003
- Location
- Wisconsin
- Posts
- 367
- Thanks (Given)
- 0
- Thanks (Received)
- 0
- Likes (Given)
- 0
- Likes (Received)
- 1
- Mentioned
- 0 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
Originally Posted by 150aintenuff
-
03-21-2006, 08:41 AM #19Originally Posted by Stinky
Originally Posted by mercurymarine22' Activator w/ 250xs Merc Opti, back home again
-
03-21-2006, 09:35 AM #205000 RPM
- Join Date
- Jul 2003
- Location
- Wisconsin
- Posts
- 367
- Thanks (Given)
- 0
- Thanks (Received)
- 0
- Likes (Given)
- 0
- Likes (Received)
- 1
- Mentioned
- 0 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
Originally Posted by blkmtrfan
http://www.gsa.gov/Portal/gsa/ep/cha...annelId=-13464
-
03-21-2006, 10:29 AM #21
I do understand GSA, the company I used to work for was involved with thier program
Sorry for the confustion Stinky, I was actually posting that to back-up your statement not oppose it22' Activator w/ 250xs Merc Opti, back home again
-
03-21-2006, 12:31 PM #225000 RPM
- Join Date
- Jul 2003
- Location
- Wisconsin
- Posts
- 367
- Thanks (Given)
- 0
- Thanks (Received)
- 0
- Likes (Given)
- 0
- Likes (Received)
- 1
- Mentioned
- 0 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
Originally Posted by blkmtrfan
I understood you, but I wanted to clarify it for others not familiar with GSA. The link should help.
-
03-21-2006, 03:48 PM #23
also it backed up my statement as well.. the specs are no gasoline usage if to be transported.. they wouldnt buy it from merc UNLESS they had a plan for it down the line.. JUST because it is a mass marketed motor rather than military use only does not mean that the developement of this motor was not partly in resopnce to the GSA contracts and governmental plans to eliminate the trasnportation of gasoline in their vessels due to volitility and safety reasons..
I present this question to you stinky would that motor still have been produced had it not been inpart for the GSA buying contracts that mercury currently holds.. souly selling it to consumers wouldnt be profitable i wouldnt think due to the fact that most people in ateast NORTH AMERICA have plentiful access to gasoline due to the usage of automobiles for transoprtation.. now over seas where gasoline prices are SKY HIGH it would be viable but not enough i wouldnt think to develope a dedicated JP fuel system to feed it efectivly as im sure things had to be changed in order for it to run properly and make effective torque and power to be marketable to its target usage..Last edited by 150aintenuff; 03-21-2006 at 03:53 PM.
4-16-2014. 25 years old today... the fishin boat doesnt look to bad for a classic does she
things that were are no longer as they are today...
-
03-21-2006, 04:00 PM #24
check your notes again stinky
Originally Posted by Stinky
Originally Posted by MERCURY MARINE
some how this statment from mercury marine disagrees with your statment shown above....
4-16-2014. 25 years old today... the fishin boat doesnt look to bad for a classic does she
things that were are no longer as they are today...
-
03-21-2006, 04:08 PM #255000 RPM
- Join Date
- Jul 2003
- Location
- Wisconsin
- Posts
- 367
- Thanks (Given)
- 0
- Thanks (Received)
- 0
- Likes (Given)
- 0
- Likes (Received)
- 1
- Mentioned
- 0 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
The motor was developed because of the rumor of the mandate of no gasoline on navel ships.
No contracts involved. Only a guess at a possible market.
If you read the first line of the add from the first post, it states that it shares 95% of its componants with a stock opti. There were no changes to the fuel system.
Kinda shows how good the Opti system is, no major changes to burn kerosine.Last edited by Stinky; 03-21-2006 at 11:17 PM.
-
03-21-2006, 04:18 PM #265000 RPM
- Join Date
- Jul 2003
- Location
- Wisconsin
- Posts
- 367
- Thanks (Given)
- 0
- Thanks (Received)
- 0
- Likes (Given)
- 0
- Likes (Received)
- 1
- Mentioned
- 0 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
Originally Posted by 150aintenuff
-
03-21-2006, 09:21 PM #27
im done bickering all we are doin is splittin hairs.. and we have a difference of opinion regaurding the reason why it was developed.. its a cool motor but unfortunatly not for the performance people even though it is assembled by the racing division..
Last edited by 150aintenuff; 03-21-2006 at 09:23 PM.
4-16-2014. 25 years old today... the fishin boat doesnt look to bad for a classic does she
things that were are no longer as they are today...
-
03-21-2006, 09:24 PM #28
Relax Nick.
-
03-21-2006, 09:42 PM #29
i did... thus my above post...
4-16-2014. 25 years old today... the fishin boat doesnt look to bad for a classic does she
things that were are no longer as they are today...
-
03-21-2006, 11:14 PM #305000 RPM
- Join Date
- Jul 2003
- Location
- Wisconsin
- Posts
- 367
- Thanks (Given)
- 0
- Thanks (Received)
- 0
- Likes (Given)
- 0
- Likes (Received)
- 1
- Mentioned
- 0 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
Originally Posted by 150aintenuff
You seemed to take a interest in the JP, and thats good. You made a few statements that weren't quite right, and I tried to set the record streight. All is good as long as the public gets the facts on new technology.
The JP may not be a performance engine, and may not fit the mold for Scream and Fly, but lets face it, green is here to stay. The more we can inform the public on the new technologys, the better they will feel about performance boating in the future.
If anyone has any more questions on the JP, I'll be more than willing to answer them.
Last edited by Stinky; 03-21-2006 at 11:19 PM.