User Tag List

  1. #3646
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    1,132
    Thanks (Given)
    4
    Thanks (Received)
    56
    Likes (Given)
    115
    Likes (Received)
    221
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The only time that Mercury was ever playing catch up was when the rotaries would show up and finish a race. Other than that, Strang was never given the freedom he wanted by the bean counters at OMC to let him build what he wanted during the factory team era. They built some specialty engines but were mainly used in Europe.

    What I always thought OMC should have done was put a rotary on a 3 pointer and raise the world record. No doubt it could have gone 145+ mph. I am sure they were unwilling to do it because it was a prototype power plant. But, it would have had Mercury trying to figure out how to get the unlimited record back.

    Even when Strang finally got what he wanted, the looper F1 V-8, Mr. Seebold would show up and out run them!
    1970 15' Allison/135 Chrysler stacker
    RC Mod-VP Boats

    IMPBA District 13
    NAMBA District 3

  2. #3647
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    1,006
    Thanks (Given)
    2
    Thanks (Received)
    232
    Likes (Given)
    9
    Likes (Received)
    364
    Mentioned
    39 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I've said this before, it wasn't so much engine as it was preparation. Merc would show up weeks ahead of time for St. Louis and test, test, test. Props, weight distribution even moving the pins to optimize lap times. All the while Molinari was doing the same with boats in Italy. OMC would bolt the engine to a boat and go race. Never in the 4 yrs. I was involved with the rotary did I see any weight distribution testing, fuel tank size or location. Hell it took an act of congress to use the snow mobile batteries instead of the cars size one; and the rotaries used 2 of them.

  3. Thanks Mark75H thanked for this post
    Likes Mark75H, Lake X Kid liked this post
  4. #3648
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Annapolis, MD ragboat capital of the world
    Posts
    11,463
    Thanks (Given)
    591
    Thanks (Received)
    164
    Likes (Given)
    2428
    Likes (Received)
    445
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)
    As CEO of OMC, I doubt someone else could dictate to Strang what money he could spend on racing. He bragged that on his tenure, OMC consistently returned a 16% ROI, a Wall Street record. He even used ROI16 as part of his email address.

    Minimal spending on actual racing was always his scheme. He learned how much it cost Carl back when he was at Merc, and he avoided the emotional/ego trap that Kiekhaefer fell into over and over.

  5. Likes GENE LANHAM, Lake X Kid liked this post
  6. #3649
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    1,132
    Thanks (Given)
    4
    Thanks (Received)
    56
    Likes (Given)
    115
    Likes (Received)
    221
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    He did want more loopers but had to settle for 2 more cylinders on a V-4. They did not even want to produce a cross flow V-6, he had to pull teeth for that and ended up proving that they would sell. Certainly to his credit, the Super Strangler was pound for pound one of the best racing engines ever.
    1970 15' Allison/135 Chrysler stacker
    RC Mod-VP Boats

    IMPBA District 13
    NAMBA District 3

  7. #3650
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    East Galesburg, IL
    Posts
    476
    Thanks (Given)
    4
    Thanks (Received)
    91
    Likes (Given)
    7
    Likes (Received)
    173
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Mark75H View Post
    As CEO of OMC, I doubt someone else could dictate to Strang what money he could spend on racing. He bragged that on his tenure, OMC consistently returned a 16% ROI, a Wall Street record. He even used ROI16 as part of his email address.

    Minimal spending on actual racing was always his scheme. He learned how much it cost Carl back when he was at Merc, and he avoided the emotional/ego trap that Kiekhaefer fell into over and over.
    And, his license plate was ROI 15%, but not 16%

  8. Thanks Mark75H thanked for this post
  9. #3651
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    2,105
    Thanks (Given)
    126
    Thanks (Received)
    245
    Likes (Given)
    128
    Likes (Received)
    686
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Mercury's OZ Success At St. Louis .....

    Quote Originally Posted by Rotary John View Post
    I've said this before, it wasn't so much engine as it was preparation. Merc would show up weeks ahead of time for St. Louis and test, test, test. Props, weight distribution even moving the pins to optimize lap times. All the while Molinari was doing the same with boats in Italy. OMC would bolt the engine to a boat and go race. Never in the 4 yrs. I was involved with the rotary did I see any weight distribution testing, fuel tank size or location. Hell it took an act of congress to use the snow mobile batteries instead of the cars size one; and the rotaries used 2 of them.
    For some reason the computer is forcing me to write this in pieces, I'll need another half hour to finish this entry ......

    Powerboat magazine interviewed Gary Garbrecht, Director of Racing - Mercury, Bill Seebold, Mercury Team Driver and Jack Leek, Director of Racing - OMC on this very subject. The following are quotes taken from the article:

    Powerboat: What did you anticipate from the OMC Team?
    Garbrecht: We thought that OMC would have a few new 150 cubic inch V-6's on hand and maybe some rotaries. I had more fear of the big rotaries since they produce an awful lot of horsepower and have a good chance of lasting through a twenty minute heat race. (Note from Willabee: Garbrecht was always good at disguising a dig as a compliment)
    Powerboat: How did you prepare for St. Louis?
    Garbrecht: We laid out a new duplicate of the St. Louis course at out own test facility. From there we just tested and tested until we felt we had the right prop and gear combination. ..... All I can say is that the harder we work, the better everything seems to turn out.

    Powerboat: How do you feel about the success of your racing season with Mercury before the St. Louis race?
    Seebold: I couldn't be happier with the Mercury T-3 and it's performance this year. We've been winning races because it's an even stronger engine this year than last, both faster and more reliable.
    Powerboat: What were the most important factors contributing to your win?
    Seebold: Instant starting off of the beach made everyone watch my transom. All that practice and preparation really paid off. After the first heat I knew the OMC drivers were hurting for power out of the corners and were slow leaving the beach. I was sure if I could just continue to make good starts, I would be hard to beat. (Note from Willabee: Seebold is hard to beat even if he doesn't get a good start)

    The computer won't let me finish on this page, I'll have to go to the next ..... to be continued!
    Last edited by willabee; 08-26-2018 at 12:26 PM.

  10. Thanks GENE LANHAM, Bob V, Mark75H, T2x thanked for this post
    Likes Bob V, Mark75H, T2x, Lake X Kid liked this post
  11. #3652
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    2,105
    Thanks (Given)
    126
    Thanks (Received)
    245
    Likes (Given)
    128
    Likes (Received)
    686
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by willabee View Post
    For some reason the computer is forcing me to write this in pieces, I'll need another half hour to finish this entry ......

    Powerboat magazine interviewed Gary Garbrecht, Director of Racing - Mercury, Bill Seebold, Mercury Team Driver and Jack Leek, Director of Racing - OMC on this very subject. The following are quotes taken from the article:

    Powerboat: What did you anticipate from the OMC Team?
    Garbrecht: We thought that OMC would have a few new 150 cubic inch V-6's on hand and maybe some rotaries. I had more fear of the big rotaries since they produce an awful lot of horsepower and have a good chance of lasting through a twenty minute heat race. (Note from Willabee: Garbrecht was always good at disguising a dig as a compliment)
    Powerboat: How did you prepare for St. Louis?
    Garbrecht: We laid out a new duplicate of the St. Louis course at out own test facility. From there we just tested and tested until we felt we had the right prop and gear combination. ..... All I can say is that the harder we work, the better everything seems to turn out.

    Powerboat: How do you feel about the success of your racing season with Mercury before the St. Louis race?
    Seebold: I couldn't be happier with the Mercury T-3 and it's performance this year. We've been winning races because it's an even stronger engine this year than last, both faster and more reliable.
    Powerboat: What were the most important factors contributing to your win?
    Seebold: Instant starting off of the beach made everyone watch my transom. All that practice and preparation really paid off. After the first heat I knew the OMC drivers were hurting for power out of the corners and were slow leaving the beach. I was sure if I could just continue to make good starts, I would be hard to beat. (Note from Willabee: Seebold is hard to beat even if he doesn't get a good start)

    The computer won't let me finish on this page, I'll have to go to the next ..... to be continued!
    Powerboat: How did you prepare for St. Louis?
    Leek: As I said, our testing was greatly limited with our new 150 cubic inchers since production of these engines was a little behind schedule. We felt our engine displacement advantage would allow us to run against the Mercurys in near stock form and still be competitive. What we really missed was a big selection of props and gear ratio changes for the new motor.
    Powerboat: How did the actual race unfold?
    Leek: Obviously things didn't go as well as we had hoped. We ran into an unexpected carburetor problem which hindered our quickness in leaving the beach on those dead water starts.
    Last edited by willabee; 08-26-2018 at 06:40 PM.

  12. Thanks T2x thanked for this post
    Likes T2x liked this post
  13. #3653
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    1,006
    Thanks (Given)
    2
    Thanks (Received)
    232
    Likes (Given)
    9
    Likes (Received)
    364
    Mentioned
    39 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Thanks for posting. It's like being there all over again. One small correction. Barry Woods lead to the first pin for all 4 heats with the rotary. He would have won if Homer hadn't disqualified him for one heat and he hadn't barreled rolled it in another.
    This is pretty much the story on OMC racing while I was involved. Merc cam prepared, OMC did not.

  14. #3654
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    2,105
    Thanks (Given)
    126
    Thanks (Received)
    245
    Likes (Given)
    128
    Likes (Received)
    686
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Rotary John View Post
    Thanks for posting. It's like being there all over again. One small correction. Barry Woods lead to the first pin for all 4 heats with the rotary. He would have won if Homer hadn't disqualified him for one heat and he hadn't barreled rolled it in another.
    This is pretty much the story on OMC racing while I was involved. Merc cam prepared, OMC did not.
    You're thinking about all the wild and crazy stuff that happened in 1974. The comments from Garbrecht, Seebold and Leek came after the 1975 race when OMC only ran their new 150 cubic inch V-6.
    Last edited by willabee; 08-26-2018 at 08:02 PM.

  15. #3655
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    1,006
    Thanks (Given)
    2
    Thanks (Received)
    232
    Likes (Given)
    9
    Likes (Received)
    364
    Mentioned
    39 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by willabee View Post
    You're thinking about all the wild and crazy stuff that happened in 1974. The comments from Garbrecht, Seebold and Leek came after the 1975 race when OMC only ran their new 150 cubic inch V-6.
    You're right. I don't believe the rotaries ran in '75

  16. #3656
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    1,006
    Thanks (Given)
    2
    Thanks (Received)
    232
    Likes (Given)
    9
    Likes (Received)
    364
    Mentioned
    39 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    " our testing was greatly limited with our new 150 cubic inchers since production of these engines was a little behind schedule" Interesting comment as the 150 raced at PeWaukee in the spring of "75; long before St. Louis. "Carburetor problem" was a std answer for the race group when they got their clock cleaned. Leek had 8/10 guys working full time on race engines only. In addition Heinrich on props, Ward Cox on gear cases and Scotti and Nagoati on boats. As I said "Preparation". Testing for OMC was which prop did you want to run.

  17. #3657
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    500
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    18
    Likes (Given)
    27
    Likes (Received)
    42
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Mark75H View Post
    As CEO of OMC, I doubt someone else could dictate to Strang what money he could spend on racing. He bragged that on his tenure, OMC consistently returned a 16% ROI, a Wall Street record. He even used ROI16 as part of his email address.

    Minimal spending on actual racing was always his scheme. He learned how much it cost Carl back when he was at Merc, and he avoided the emotional/ego trap that Kiekhaefer fell into over and over.
    Hmmm. Is that why they went out of business?��

  18. #3658
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    2,105
    Thanks (Given)
    126
    Thanks (Received)
    245
    Likes (Given)
    128
    Likes (Received)
    686
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Hot Single .....

    Saw a couple more pics that mbd29 posted om a different thread, just think they belong on Hot Singles.

    Jim Merten in a 16' Molinari sprint at the Miami 225 in 1970 .....
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Merten at Miami 1970.jpg 
Views:	314 
Size:	380.4 KB 
ID:	416632


    This sprint was one of three that came from Molinari's shop in 1970.This boat was driven by several guys including Merten, Sirois and Stickle and had a pretty successful life, especially compared to the other two. It won the Miami 225 in what I think was it's first race. It set a couple of records while winning the Miami Nationals in SJ and S classes. Was leading the St. Mary's Enduro when the steering broke. It was shipped back to Europe to compete in the Paris and Berlin 6 Hour events. It finished 5th in Paris and was leading Berlin when it had some kind of mechanical problem. It finished 3rd in the Parker 9 Hour, was sold and went on to win a number of races driven by Jim Hunt.

  19. #3659
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    BRISTOL, FL
    Posts
    190
    Thanks (Given)
    78
    Thanks (Received)
    54
    Likes (Given)
    341
    Likes (Received)
    190
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by willabee View Post
    Saw a couple more pics that mbd29 posted om a different thread, just think they belong on Hot Singles.

    Jim Merten in a 16' Molinari sprint at the Miami 225 in 1970 .....
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Merten at Miami 1970.jpg 
Views:	314 
Size:	380.4 KB 
ID:	416632


    This sprint was one of three that came from Molinari's shop in 1970.This boat was driven by several guys including Merten, Sirois and Stickle and had a pretty successful life, especially compared to the other two. It won the Miami 225 in what I think was it's first race. It set a couple of records while winning the Miami Nationals in SJ and S classes. Was leading the St. Mary's Enduro when the steering broke. It was shipped back to Europe to compete in the Paris and Berlin 6 Hour events. It finished 5th in Paris and was leading Berlin when it had some kind of mechanical problem. It finished 3rd in the Parker 9 Hour, was sold and went on to win a number of races driven by Jim Hunt.
    i drove it for 7 hours, bill petty drove 1 3/4 hours and one of the berghauer's drove 1 lap at parker 71. harold bartee bought boat after parker i put a 1250 sbp/staker for a few races then put the cowbell on it.
    The "Wheel Man" of the Sunshine Syndicate

  20. #3660
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Clearwater, Florida
    Posts
    1,364
    Thanks (Given)
    357
    Thanks (Received)
    344
    Likes (Given)
    903
    Likes (Received)
    792
    Mentioned
    16 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by OLEGATOR View Post
    i drove it for 7 hours, bill petty drove 1 3/4 hours and one of the berghauer's drove 1 lap at parker 71. harold bartee bought boat after parker i put a 1250 sbp/staker for a few races then put the cowbell on it.
    Jim - Is that the boat that you ran in the Clearwater Fun 'n Sun with a cowbell that put such a hurting on Duff Daily and his Hemi powered "Oh Mona" GN boat?

Page 244 of 348 FirstFirst ... 144 194 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 294 344 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Aeromarine Research