User Tag List

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 16

Thread: 2.0 versus 2.5

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Plainville, CT
    Posts
    804
    Thanks (Given)
    417
    Thanks (Received)
    23
    Likes (Given)
    377
    Likes (Received)
    67
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    2.0 versus 2.5

    Is there any reliability advantage of the 2.0's verses the 2.5's because of the thicker cylinder wall?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    GA
    Posts
    855
    Thanks (Given)
    1
    Thanks (Received)
    25
    Likes (Given)
    35
    Likes (Received)
    71
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    No Question. 2.5

  3. Thanks Glastron1987 thanked for this post
    Likes Glastron1987 liked this post
  4. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    2,331
    Thanks (Given)
    458
    Thanks (Received)
    343
    Likes (Given)
    6429
    Likes (Received)
    5147
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Do they get started in gear?

  5. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Plainville, CT
    Posts
    804
    Thanks (Given)
    417
    Thanks (Received)
    23
    Likes (Given)
    377
    Likes (Received)
    67
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by SS Minnow View Post
    Do they get started in gear?
    Not sure I understand the question.

  6. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Location
    Ashland city tn
    Posts
    4,774
    Thanks (Given)
    226
    Thanks (Received)
    353
    Likes (Given)
    1177
    Likes (Received)
    1115
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    I'll go out on a limb here and say the 2.0 can take a beating and run forever , 2.5 is great to but I gotta say 2.0 last longer imo

  7. Thanks Glastron1987 thanked for this post
  8. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2018
    Location
    Floating around
    Posts
    3,971
    Thanks (Given)
    466
    Thanks (Received)
    423
    Likes (Given)
    3381
    Likes (Received)
    2471
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Tune and maintenance are what make a two stroke run strong and live long. Neglect either and it only takes a second to burn one into a dud. Iron lined engines are easier to rebuild because they can be over bored where nickel/chrome you must replace the liner which is far more costly. From what I have seen and learned ALL the V6 Mercs are reliable in good tune shape especially if left stock. Mods and lean tune ups chasing power are responsible for more melted Mercury aluminum than any 2.0 vs 2.5 differences.

    Buy on condition and numbers; compression/leakdown
    Hydrostream dreamin

  9. Thanks Glastron1987 thanked for this post
    Likes Glastron1987 liked this post
  10. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Lufkin, Texas
    Posts
    2,642
    Thanks (Given)
    301
    Thanks (Received)
    275
    Likes (Given)
    1788
    Likes (Received)
    1265
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    2.0 will last longer especially in a high rpm application. Pistons are lighter and put less strain on the crank and bearings!
    Josh Peterson

  11. Thanks Glastron1987 thanked for this post
    Likes Glastron1987, 90 5.0 liked this post
  12. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Plainville, CT
    Posts
    804
    Thanks (Given)
    417
    Thanks (Received)
    23
    Likes (Given)
    377
    Likes (Received)
    67
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Thanks for all the good input.

  13. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Location
    Miami, FL
    Posts
    358
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    10
    Likes (Given)
    1
    Likes (Received)
    47
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    I've heard the 2.0 is pretty reliable. I have a block waiting to get fixed. #1 went lean and melted the piston. My winter project is to build that up and keep as a spare powerhead or find a little 17 action for it

  14. Thanks Glastron1987 thanked for this post
    Likes Glastron1987 liked this post
  15. #10
    Join Date
    Jun 2018
    Location
    Floating around
    Posts
    3,971
    Thanks (Given)
    466
    Thanks (Received)
    423
    Likes (Given)
    3381
    Likes (Received)
    2471
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Theres some mighty fast 2.0L's around too...
    Hydrostream dreamin

  16. Likes Capt.Insane-o, nitro_rat, 90 5.0 liked this post
  17. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Location
    Ashland city tn
    Posts
    4,774
    Thanks (Given)
    226
    Thanks (Received)
    353
    Likes (Given)
    1177
    Likes (Received)
    1115
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    2.0 has a extra thick cyl wall which is why they can take such a beating , and if it does go , they most likely can b bored without sleeves , just a all round good mota. I'd buy one again n heart beat , with mod plans ov course haha. I'd love have me a finger ported 2.0 for the little checkmate , but again that's quite bit$$$$ for those mods , unless get a champ mota .. hope I'm not mistaken but which is only 2.0 fingerported

  18. Thanks Glastron1987 thanked for this post
    Likes LakeFever, Glastron1987 liked this post
  19. #12
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    15,422
    Thanks (Given)
    214
    Thanks (Received)
    475
    Likes (Given)
    7697
    Likes (Received)
    4259
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    The 2.0 champ motor is a mini 2.5 with a bridged exhaust..without the low end torque...the party starts at 5000 rpm. The fishing 2.0 is ported different and takes a lot of work and need 180-200 lbs of compression.

  20. Thanks Merc 2.5 thanked for this post
  21. #13
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Location
    Miami, FL
    Posts
    358
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    10
    Likes (Given)
    1
    Likes (Received)
    47
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Capt.Insane-o View Post
    The 2.0 champ motor is a mini 2.5 with a bridged exhaust..without the low end torque...the party starts at 5000 rpm. The fishing 2.0 is ported different and takes a lot of work and need 180-200 lbs of compression.
    I've seen some with work, I think you built a couple right? Called tubers with the tubes in the block. I'm assuming since mine is a later one based on a 2.5 block, it is not quite the same as the earlier style. What needs to be done to it to make like 175+ hp. It is a spare block so I'm wanting to learn a little more about them. It would go on a light hull that doesn't need the torque like my flats boat needs. I have a 2.5 200 for that one.

  22. #14
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    houston, tx
    Posts
    1,464
    Thanks (Given)
    32
    Thanks (Received)
    62
    Likes (Given)
    485
    Likes (Received)
    289
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Radiant View Post
    I've seen some with work, I think you built a couple right? Called tubers with the tubes in the block. I'm assuming since mine is a later one based on a 2.5 block, it is not quite the same as the earlier style. What needs to be done to it to make like 175+ hp. It is a spare block so I'm wanting to learn a little more about them. It would go on a light hull that doesn't need the torque like my flats boat needs. I have a 2.5 200 for that one.
    Cut heads to 150psi(I don’t rember the cc’s in a 2.0 off the top of my head but I THINK 28cc’s is it. )

    2.4 200 bell tuner and wh-22 carbs imo will get you where you want to be

    16 amp flywheel for high rpm.

    The amount of time mine has spent north of 7k can probably be counted in years, not hours lol.

    Its an 87’ Xr2, got warranty rebuilt when oil pump died, hasn’t been apart since.

  23. Likes nitro_rat liked this post
  24. #15
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Lufkin, Texas
    Posts
    2,642
    Thanks (Given)
    301
    Thanks (Received)
    275
    Likes (Given)
    1788
    Likes (Received)
    1265
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    26cc is supposed to be the magic number for the 2.0
    Josh Peterson

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Mercury Tech: 245 versus 260
    By bullwhipjkg in forum Technical Discussion
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 02-25-2010, 02:45 PM
  2. H.P. Versus Torque
    By capnzee in forum Technical Discussion
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 03-20-2009, 05:00 PM
  3. 50:1 versus 25:1
    By capnzee in forum Technical Discussion
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 08-16-2007, 03:41 PM
  4. C-5 Z-06 versus C-6 which is better
    By Charlie M in forum Other Motorsports
    Replies: 57
    Last Post: 12-22-2006, 11:31 PM
  5. OMC v6 200 versus 225 ('96)
    By tcsmith315 in forum Technical Discussion
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 08-01-2003, 05:42 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Aeromarine Research