User Tag List

Page 9 of 10 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 LastLast
Results 121 to 135 of 137
  1. #121
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Boynton Beach, FL
    Posts
    74
    Thanks (Given)
    13
    Thanks (Received)
    3
    Likes (Given)
    18
    Likes (Received)
    8
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Awesome concept and great turnout!
    Beer will not solve all of your problems... but neither will milk!

    2005 Lightning 18' Action - 150 Optimax - SOLD
    1982 Eliminator Daytona 23' - Twin 260's - SOLD
    2012 Concept 32FE - Twin 300 Verados

  2. Thanks engineermike thanked for this post
  3. #122
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Gonzales, La
    Posts
    1,085
    Thanks (Given)
    114
    Thanks (Received)
    69
    Likes (Given)
    218
    Likes (Received)
    355
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Folks, I'm looking for a little more prop feedback. As mentioned before, my boat ran terrible with bravo1 props, 88 with a blaster, 93.5 with a promax and raised 3/4", and 97.6 with a max5. All were 28". I bought the promax because the price was right, all the manners were good, and the top speed was good enough for normal use. However, I've since discovered that I've lost 25-30% of my mid and low speed fuel economy versus what I got with the borrowed max5. Apparently, my high running propshaft is causing too much slip and maybe not enough lift with only 4 blades.

    Anyway, I'm kicking around 3 options:
    1. Bite the bullet and just buy a max5. It's a proven performer on my boat.
    2. Get a base Maximus. It's much cheaper and has more blade area so it could potentially work even better at mid and low speeds. If I could hit 85 still I'd be happy for my everyday prop. If it doesn't work, bblades says they can convert it to a max5.
    3. I found a deal on a hydromotive P5 (NOT P5X). Price is right but everything I read says it's a stern lifter. Based on my experience with stern-lifting bravo1's, I'm not sure how well it would work. The center pod gives me plenty, if not too much, stern lift.
    Last edited by engineermike; 05-22-2018 at 06:04 PM.

  4. Thanks Scream And Fly thanked for this post
    Likes Scream And Fly liked this post
  5. #123
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Boynton Beach, FL
    Posts
    74
    Thanks (Given)
    13
    Thanks (Received)
    3
    Likes (Given)
    18
    Likes (Received)
    8
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Out of those 3 options, I would buy the Max5 and call it a day. It is your benchmark for everything in your post. You can do the other options later, but get to where you can run your rig at your established benchmark.

    I wanted to also ask if you go out in the Gulf with your rig, and how it does if you do? I moved to South Florida, Boynton Beach to be exact, and am concerned the 23' is not going to be a good choice for blasts out in the Atlantic and getting through the inlets. I may need to get something with some more gunwale height. Any opinions welcome!
    Beer will not solve all of your problems... but neither will milk!

    2005 Lightning 18' Action - 150 Optimax - SOLD
    1982 Eliminator Daytona 23' - Twin 260's - SOLD
    2012 Concept 32FE - Twin 300 Verados

  6. #124
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Gonzales, La
    Posts
    1,085
    Thanks (Given)
    114
    Thanks (Received)
    69
    Likes (Given)
    218
    Likes (Received)
    355
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Hard for me to say about offshore performance because I have little experience with that and different hulls. I can say the eliminator handles boat wakes like a dream, much better than similarly sized v hulls. In big head-on waves, it can hit pretty hard. I crossed the lake in honest 3' seas (5' by most estimates) and the wife wasn't comfortable but I wouldn't classify it anywhere near dangerous.

  7. Thanks RikuY thanked for this post
  8. #125
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    ca
    Posts
    105
    Thanks (Given)
    8
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Given)
    4
    Likes (Received)
    25
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Good that you took the time to restore this 23. I have owned 4 eliminators and don’t have the patience or skills to tackle this level of rebuild. I have a 28 with twin 400’s that performs best withMerc CNC cleavers with 34 pitch. Added 6 mph over max 5, just kinda pricey.

  9. #126
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    minocqua, wis
    Posts
    3,557
    Thanks (Given)
    4
    Thanks (Received)
    79
    Likes (Given)
    306
    Likes (Received)
    503
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    23 Daytona does pretty good in 3 foot chop and after noon boat slop we used to fly across lake tomahawk at 90 mph when the ski boats were idling along along with pontoons they must of thought we were nuts 1 foot or more and my 22 twister goes back on the trailer

  10. Thanks RikuY thanked for this post
  11. #127
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Gonzales, La
    Posts
    1,085
    Thanks (Given)
    114
    Thanks (Received)
    69
    Likes (Given)
    218
    Likes (Received)
    355
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Just an update....I was fretting over a 30% increase in fuel efficiency at 60 mph when using the pro max vs the max5 props. Another board member graciously loaned me a 26" Maximus, which is largely considered a high powered i/o prop. It worked pretty good, gaining back some fuel efficiency (though not as good as max5 still). While I wasn't looking hard at top speed, kmowing I would lose some due to being on the limiter plus excess blade area, it still managed 88.4 mph in spite of much hotter ambient temp. The acceleration and other manners were excellent though.

    I have the 25" p5x coming so we will see how it does.

  12. #128
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    1,564
    Thanks (Given)
    10
    Thanks (Received)
    78
    Likes (Given)
    144
    Likes (Received)
    593
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    After watching the video the boat is not balanced at all. You need a lot more setback to get that boat to fly and let the hull lift with the air not trying to force it up with the prop. I think about 6" further back. I bet your slip ratio is high. The rooster tail is way too high as you are running positive trim to fly the boat. I have owned a 24 and 25 Eliminator and worked with ELI on setup of his 23. Setup is everything. Props will get you the last few mile per hour. I do think a five blade will help but you are over compensating for the lack of natural bow lift in the tunnel. Going back will also allow you to raise the motor higher and run a bigger prop.
    Look at the setback of my 24 with twins. That hull was much lighter than a 23 and had a lot more setback with two engines that yours with one. The 25 was also very light and still had a lot more setback with twins than your 23.
    It will be night and day when you balance the boat. ELI's 23 was setup perfect and look at how it flies in only a 1000' radar run and notice his rooster tail is perfect at the finish line at about the height of the engine or even less at higher speeds.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails 24 daytona.jpg   DSCF9312.jpg   DSCF9269.jpg   jaydaytona.jpg  
    Last edited by Brad Zastrow; 06-14-2018 at 01:51 PM.

  13. #129
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    1,564
    Thanks (Given)
    10
    Thanks (Received)
    78
    Likes (Given)
    144
    Likes (Received)
    593
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I am thinking that boat should run near 100 mph setup correctly. Props are the thing that get you the last 5 mph.
    Last edited by Brad Zastrow; 06-14-2018 at 01:57 PM.

  14. #130
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Gonzales, La
    Posts
    1,085
    Thanks (Given)
    114
    Thanks (Received)
    69
    Likes (Given)
    218
    Likes (Received)
    355
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_8010.PNG 
Views:	35 
Size:	1.51 MB 
ID:	410050
    Quote Originally Posted by Brad Zastrow
    I am thinking that boat should run near 100 mph setup correctly.

    My best so far was 98.6, and I haven't corrected the "hook" in the hull yet.
    Last edited by engineermike; 06-14-2018 at 02:47 PM.

  15. Likes NICE PAIR liked this post
  16. #131
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    1,564
    Thanks (Given)
    10
    Thanks (Received)
    78
    Likes (Given)
    144
    Likes (Received)
    593
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Wow. Sounds like you getting it dialed in. The photo looks much better than the video did.

  17. #132
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Jacksonville, Florida
    Posts
    66
    Thanks (Given)
    1
    Thanks (Received)
    2
    Likes (Given)
    7
    Likes (Received)
    38
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Set Back and Height

    Agreed. Set back and height. This kevlar set up with 4.blade 30's would easily turn 8500 rpm. We cut an inch off.the back 16" off the center pod.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails IMG_0268.JPG   IMG_0190.jpg  
    Last edited by mmartin; 06-14-2018 at 03:25 PM.

  18. #133
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    Baton Rouge, La
    Posts
    3,026
    Thanks (Given)
    7
    Thanks (Received)
    57
    Likes (Given)
    469
    Likes (Received)
    235
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)
    I have nothing pertinent to add but nice ride and now I know what it looks like! Mike
    Cheaters never Win !!!

  19. Thanks engineermike thanked for this post
  20. #134
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Formerly Central WI/LOTO Currently PHX AZ
    Posts
    490
    Thanks (Given)
    61
    Thanks (Received)
    82
    Likes (Given)
    1247
    Likes (Received)
    423
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_1205.jpg 
Views:	27 
Size:	308.8 KB 
ID:	410066

    This one has 6"x62" out. On the water next month. mmartin, I'd love to hear before and after comments if you have them.
    A problem is only a problem when viewed as a problem...

  21. Likes AZMIDLYF liked this post
  22. #135
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Gonzales, La
    Posts
    1,085
    Thanks (Given)
    114
    Thanks (Received)
    69
    Likes (Given)
    218
    Likes (Received)
    355
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I've been doing some more prop testing, mainly in search of an efficient and quick accelerating every-day prop. Here's a summary of all the props I've tried:

    77 mph, 22% slip with a 26" bravo1
    88.0 mph, 15% slip with a 27" blaster (7/8" above pad)

    91.0, 15% with a 28" promax (7/8)
    93.5, 13% with 28" promax (1 5/8" above). 3.7 mpg at 31 mph.
    97.6, 8.5% with 28" max5 (1 5/8). 4.2 mpg at 27 mph.
    88.4, 11.5% with 26" Maximus, 1 5/8. 4.3 mpg at 27 mph.
    87.0, 9.5% with a 25" P5X, 1 5/8. 4.1 mpg at 32 mph.

    All were 7000-7100 rpm.

    Mpg was the peak for that prop. Of those with mpg shown, the Maximus was the most efficient up to 31 mph, p5x most efficient 31-37 mph, and max5 most efficient from 37 on up.

    It's pretty clear from an efficiency and slip perspective that the boat likes 5 blades.
    Last edited by engineermike; 06-24-2018 at 03:17 PM.

  23. Likes HydroSkreamin, Scream And Fly liked this post
Page 9 of 10 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •