It seems it has been an argument ongoing, with ambiguous support more for the driver's skill or it was the vehicles undisputed superiority. One side will say put another driver in the winner's vehicle, and you will get the same winners result.
Then a lot of opinions will state it was 60% driver's skill and 40% vehicle's capability, or vice a versa.
The sliding scale of subjectivity is more art than science. But makes for interesting conversation.
Albeit champion drivers lean to, the scale favoring a greater percentage toward their skill level.
And engineers and mechanics might lean to the technology, being the higher percentage for winning.
Attachment 477243