Printable View
Diane Feinstein died @ 90 the other day. How good would any of us be at our job at the same age ... ???Quote:
Originally Posted by Instigator
The empty suit in the white house is just as bad ... if not much worse.
So who's really calling the shots .. ??? It's easy to see that whom ever it is, they certainly don't like America ... only power !
This is just A.I. talking , but could be more of a reality that any of us think.
https://www.instagram.com/reel/Cw0Jl...M2ODFkZg%3D%3D
Well, first we need a "leader", and then he needs to form an organization to enlist into and -------------
You poor guys missed the Jan 6 th Gig...
Steve Bannon is your guy
I thought politics belong in it's section
How come you guys don't care what Greg wants ?
How many times does he have to bring this up,
and It's always the same hand full, doing the same chit.
Obama and his Attorney General, Eric holder.
Both hate white people, hate America and are racist pricks!
Neither one ever saw a TV camera they didn’t like, especially holder yet he has disappeared since Obama got out of office???
And Obama is the only ex president ever, to never leave town after getting out of office.
Biden is just a puppet.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chaz
Let me guess, the "village idiot" said nothing about the energy sect. personally being heavily invested in EV's ... ??? :reddevil:
If global warming is real, then why would Simba .. err ... BoBamba put his family @ risk by putting them on Martha's Vinyard facing the polar ice caps .. ??? :rolleyes:
Common sense questions .. that the lefties run from ... :thumbsup:
Chaz the Truth
Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm recently sold off stock in an electric vehicle company, a department spokesman said, divesting her interest after ethics experts and Republican officials pointed out the conflict-of-interest concerns.
The company, Proterra, makes technology for electric vehicles – a key piece of the Biden administration’s energy and climate change plans. Recent events with President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris drew attention to the company, which will become publicly traded this year.
Politico first reported Granholm’s move.
Granholm resigned from the Proterra board to take the Energy Department position and wrote in her ethics agreement that she would “divest my vested stock options in Proterra, Inc., as soon as practicable but not later than 180 days after my confirmation.”
According to the ethics agreement, she forfeited her unvested stocks when she resigned from the Proterra board. And per the agreement, she exercised her vested stock options and then sold the stock for a net capital gains of $1.6 million on the sale, according to the Energy Department spokesman. The transaction was completed sooner than required by her ethics agreement, the spokesman said.
“Secretary Granholm has acted in full accordance with the comprehensive ethical standards set by the Biden Administration and has completed her divestment well ahead of the time required by her ethics agreement,” the spokesman said.
A document filed with the Office of Government Ethics dated May 7 says Granholm sold 240,520 shares.
Chaz stick to something know... welding
Scientific Consensus: Earth's Climate Is Warming
Facts›Scientific Consensus
https://climate.nasa.gov/rails/activ...osition=inlineTemperature data showing rapid warming in the past few decades, the latest data going up to 2022. According to NASA, 2016 and 2020 are tied for the warmest year since 1880, continuing a long-term trend of rising global temperatures. On top of that, the nine most recent years have been the hottest. Credit: NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies
It’s important to remember that scientists always focus on the evidence, not on opinions. Scientific evidence continues to show that human activities (primarily the human burning of fossil fuels) have warmed Earth’s surface and its ocean basins, which in turn have continued to impact Earth’s climate. This is based on over a century of scientific evidence forming the structural backbone of today's civilization.
NASA Global Climate Change presents the state of scientific knowledge about climate change while highlighting the role NASA plays in better understanding our home planet. This effort includes citing multiple peer-reviewed studies from research groups across the world,1 illustrating the accuracy and consensus of research results (in this case, the scientific consensus on climate change) consistent with NASA’s scientific research portfolio.
With that said, multiple studies published in peer-reviewed scientific journals1 show that climate-warming trends over the past century are extremely likely due to human activities. In addition, most of the leading scientific organizations worldwide have issued public statements endorsing this position. The following is a partial list of these organizations, along with links to their published statements and a selection of related resources.
AMERICAN SCIENTIFIC SOCIETIES
Statement on Climate Change from 18 Scientific Associations
"Observations throughout the world make it clear that climate change is occurring, and rigorous scientific research demonstrates that the greenhouse gases emitted by human activities are the primary driver." (2009)2
https://climate.nasa.gov/system/inte...AS_320x240.jpg
American Association for the Advancement of Science
"Based on well-established evidence, about 97% of climate scientists have concluded that human-caused climate change is happening." (2014)3
https://climate.nasa.gov/system/inte...ty_320x240.jpg
American Chemical Society
"The Earth’s climate is changing in response to increasing concentrations of greenhouse gases (GHGs) and particulate matter in the atmosphere, largely as the result of human activities." (2016-2019)4
https://climate.nasa.gov/system/inte...on_320x240.jpg
American Geophysical Union
"Based on extensive scientific evidence, it is extremely likely that human activities, especially emissions of greenhouse gases, are the dominant cause of the observed warming since the mid-20th century. There is no alterative explanation supported by convincing evidence." (2019)5
https://climate.nasa.gov/system/inte...on_320x240.jpg
American Medical Association
"Our AMA ... supports the findings of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s fourth assessment report and concurs with the scientific consensus that the Earth is undergoing adverse global climate change and that anthropogenic contributions are significant." (2019)6
https://climate.nasa.gov/system/inte...ty_320x240.jpg
American Meteorological Society
"Research has found a human influence on the climate of the past several decades ... The IPCC (2013), USGCRP (2017), and USGCRP (2018) indicate that it is extremely likely that human influence has been the dominant cause of the observed warming since the mid-twentieth century." (2019)7
https://climate.nasa.gov/system/inte...ty_320x240.jpg
American Physical Society
"Earth's changing climate is a critical issue and poses the risk of significant environmental, social and economic disruptions around the globe. While natural sources of climate variability are significant, multiple lines of evidence indicate that human influences have had an increasingly dominant effect on global climate warming observed since the mid-twentieth century." (2015)8
https://climate.nasa.gov/system/inte...ca_320x240.jpg
The Geological Society of America
"The Geological Society of America (GSA) concurs with assessments by the National Academies of Science (2005), the National Research Council (2011), the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC, 2013) and the U.S. Global Change Research Program (Melillo et al., 2014) that global climate has warmed in response to increasing concentrations of carbon dioxide (CO2) and other greenhouse gases ... Human activities (mainly greenhouse-gas emissions) are the dominant cause of the rapid warming since the middle 1900s (IPCC, 2013)." (2015)9
SCIENCE ACADEMIES
International Academies: Joint Statement
"Climate change is real. There will always be uncertainty in understanding a system as complex as the world’s climate. However there is now strong evidence that significant global warming is occurring. The evidence comes from direct measurements of rising surface air temperatures and subsurface ocean temperatures and from phenomena such as increases in average global sea levels, retreating glaciers, and changes to many physical and biological systems. It is likely that most of the warming in recent decades can be attributed to human activities (IPCC 2001)." (2005, 11 international science academies)10
https://climate.nasa.gov/system/inte...ce_320x240.jpg
U.S. National Academy of Sciences
"Scientists have known for some time, from multiple lines of evidence, that humans are changing Earth’s climate, primarily through greenhouse gas emissions."11
U.S. GOVERNMENT AGENCIES
https://climate.nasa.gov/system/inte...rp_320x240.jpg
U.S. Global Change Research Program
"Earth’s climate is now changing faster than at any point in the history of modern civilization, primarily as a result of human activities." (2018, 13 U.S. government departments and agencies)12
INTERGOVERNMENTAL BODIES
https://climate.nasa.gov/system/inte...cc_320x240.jpg
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
“It is unequivocal that the increase of CO2, methane, and nitrous oxide in the atmosphere over the industrial era is the result of human activities and that human influence is the principal driver of many changes observed across the atmosphere, ocean, cryosphere, and biosphere.
“Since systematic scientific assessments began in the 1970s, the influence of human activity on the warming of the climate system has evolved from theory to established fact.”13-17
OTHER RESOURCES
List of Worldwide Scientific Organizations
The following page lists the nearly 200 worldwide scientific organizations that hold the position that climate change has been caused by human action.
http://www.opr.ca.gov/facts/list-of-...nizations.html
U.S. Agencies
The following page contains information on what federal agencies are doing to adapt to climate change.
https://www.c2es.org/site/assets/upl...-are-doing.pdf
Technically, a “consensus” is a general agreement of opinion, but the scientific method steers us away from this to an objective framework. In science, facts or observations are explained by a hypothesis (a statement of a possible explanation for some natural phenomenon), which can then be tested and retested until it is refuted (or disproved).
As scientists gather more observations, they will build off one explanation and add details to complete the picture. Eventually, a group of hypotheses might be integrated and generalized into a scientific theory, a scientifically acceptable general principle or body of principles offered to explain phenomena.
References
- K. Myers, et al, "Consensus revisited: quantifying scientific agreement on climate change and climate expertise among Earth scientists 10 years later", Environmental Research Letters Vol.16 No. 10, 104030 (20 October 2021); DOI:10.1088/1748-9326/ac2774
M. Lynas, et al, "Greater than 99% consensus on human caused climate change in the peer-reviewed scientific literature", Environmental Research Letters Vol.16 No. 11, 114005 (19 October 2021); DOI:10.1088/1748-9326/ac2966
J. Cook et al., "Consensus on consensus: a synthesis of consensus
The farther Lil Jimmie veers from the truth .. the more he st .. stuuu .. stutters when it's placed right in front of him ... ;)
3, 2, 1, daddyyyyyyyyyy .. :rolleyes:
https://i.imgur.com/CjXc4vbl.jpg
The ignore feature is a wonderful thing.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chaz
IS there any government funded agency saying maybe there isnt global warming?
Is there any government agency not using homogenized temp data to say here is the temp
It hit the fan in Australia when a scientist had/has a family thermometer that 3 generations have been keeping records for 80 years and it shows no average temp change nor any higher peaks and lows.
The data was being supplied to the gov and they asked the very famous research establishment, the CSIRO, to delete it, the scientists were disgusted and stole it so the public now know.
When I was kid, the "experts" swore we were on the verge of a catastrophic ice age, when it didn't happen they said, "Good thing you stupid bastards listen to us!" Climate hoax 1 in my lifetime.
Next was acid rain... my skin should have melted off in 2010; "Good thing you stupid bastards listened to us!" Climate hoax 2 in my lifetime.
Man-made climate change is hoax #3, in my lifetime... but there will be more. It's "money for nothing" every time they cry wolf!
Lpets just say if human kind is resonsible for climate warming , we are deeply screwed because china is building coal plants on an average of 2 a week and india as one of the hottest country's is going to industrialize with 1.3 biljoen people
That means a lot of flying, driving and airconditioning let alone for the rest of asia or africa
Just keep your fingers crossed we don't have an impact suchs as claimed
Now being a bitch for arab country's is another matter being less depended on MBS is a good thing
https://youtu.be/01aFP88qfQs?si=9Qs0iyIVFLgjPZxn
Hydrogen cars will dominate the market soon. These drill battery cars will fade into history as another bad idea that was forced upon us.