Ron V
06-12-2005, 08:00 AM
OK guys, between my father, friends, and me, we've got a few decades of tinkering with boats of various types, though admittedly not with this much power. This one has us beat.
My Rapid Craft was built as a SKI boat, and they were used by ski clubs. Plain old rounded v-bottom with strakes. The boat has a 23" transom, so I know they are able to run at least that high and pull skiers. I have the motor about 1/2" above the transom (2nd set of holes). This puts the prop shaft about 3.5" - 4" below the bottom when tucked under. No setback. People who have seen my boat run know that there is nothing wrong with the setup for top speed or cruising.
The problem: I've tried skiing behind it, and it's real strong for the first 10 feet or so, until the boat breaks over. Then the prop lets go. It does this when I'm just riding too - but it's not much of a problem, just part of getting a high performance rig on plane. It's even OK with passengers. But put a load behind the boat and it can't handle it. It just sits and spins. It's worth noting that I am actually up out of the water and the ski is on plane when the trouble starts, so obviously it is having a very difficult time with even minimal load on it. The prop is not biting AT ALL apparently. I'm a 125 lb. skier starting from deep water on a 65" slalom ski.
This happened with the 27" SRX, so I thought a thru-hub would solve it. Put on a 27" Laser II, - it was worse! Almost blew the rods out of the motor. Bought plugs for all three vent holes on the Laser II and it didn't help the blowout on a normal takeoff (in fact it hurt the initial holeshot) with no skier, so I don't want to try pulling a skier again with it. By now I'm thinking it's a problem with that much pitch just not being able to bite with that little forward speed. So, just for kicks, I put the 21" cupped 2-blade bronze inline-6 prop from my dad's boat on it and took it out just to see how it would bite with no load behind it. Not sure if the smaller diameter contributed to it, but it almost didn't get on plane with just me in it. Herein however may lie an indication that there is an inherent problem with turbulence with this rig if a prop with fewer blades and less cup had more trouble?? So....three different props, three different designs (granted it was a joke to try the 2-blade bronze), with a 6" variance in pitch, same inherent problem. Funny thing is the overhub prop (SRX) had the least trouble.
The boat runs 72 mph with a stock 150, but as it sits I'm not confident it would pull an 175 lb. person on an inner tube. Something is grossly but very simply amiss, what I don't know. Maybe a 21" High Five with triple-cupped blades? The motor height is fairly conservative......there simply HAS to be a way to get the power to the water. :confused:
My Rapid Craft was built as a SKI boat, and they were used by ski clubs. Plain old rounded v-bottom with strakes. The boat has a 23" transom, so I know they are able to run at least that high and pull skiers. I have the motor about 1/2" above the transom (2nd set of holes). This puts the prop shaft about 3.5" - 4" below the bottom when tucked under. No setback. People who have seen my boat run know that there is nothing wrong with the setup for top speed or cruising.
The problem: I've tried skiing behind it, and it's real strong for the first 10 feet or so, until the boat breaks over. Then the prop lets go. It does this when I'm just riding too - but it's not much of a problem, just part of getting a high performance rig on plane. It's even OK with passengers. But put a load behind the boat and it can't handle it. It just sits and spins. It's worth noting that I am actually up out of the water and the ski is on plane when the trouble starts, so obviously it is having a very difficult time with even minimal load on it. The prop is not biting AT ALL apparently. I'm a 125 lb. skier starting from deep water on a 65" slalom ski.
This happened with the 27" SRX, so I thought a thru-hub would solve it. Put on a 27" Laser II, - it was worse! Almost blew the rods out of the motor. Bought plugs for all three vent holes on the Laser II and it didn't help the blowout on a normal takeoff (in fact it hurt the initial holeshot) with no skier, so I don't want to try pulling a skier again with it. By now I'm thinking it's a problem with that much pitch just not being able to bite with that little forward speed. So, just for kicks, I put the 21" cupped 2-blade bronze inline-6 prop from my dad's boat on it and took it out just to see how it would bite with no load behind it. Not sure if the smaller diameter contributed to it, but it almost didn't get on plane with just me in it. Herein however may lie an indication that there is an inherent problem with turbulence with this rig if a prop with fewer blades and less cup had more trouble?? So....three different props, three different designs (granted it was a joke to try the 2-blade bronze), with a 6" variance in pitch, same inherent problem. Funny thing is the overhub prop (SRX) had the least trouble.
The boat runs 72 mph with a stock 150, but as it sits I'm not confident it would pull an 175 lb. person on an inner tube. Something is grossly but very simply amiss, what I don't know. Maybe a 21" High Five with triple-cupped blades? The motor height is fairly conservative......there simply HAS to be a way to get the power to the water. :confused: