View Full Version : looper question
phil blomquist
10-14-2009, 10:01 PM
wrist pin bearings,witch is better for wear loose needle bearings or caged? putting togather parts list and i was wondering would one be better on the long run or does it really matter thanks:D phil
BeefKid
10-14-2009, 10:04 PM
we use caged.... seems to hold up lol...especially for spinning 8k everytime out:thumbsup:
phil blomquist
10-14-2009, 10:14 PM
thanks for reply caged would seem to be easier install for sure i was thinking more bearing surface with loose thats why i asked thanks phil:smiletest:
racer
10-15-2009, 12:00 AM
I would not use the loose ones on an engine that will see over 7000 rpm under either is fine. The problem is not the rollers its that washers.
scc82
10-15-2009, 12:07 AM
the loose bearings are definetly better, twice the contact surface. mercs use loose bearings and they turn higher then any looper will. im sure either one will work fine for you, but loose is better, for sure.
Instigator
10-15-2009, 07:00 AM
we use caged.... seems to hold up lol...especially for spinning 8k every time out:thumbsup:
if they hold up for two hooligan brothers that have boats with light switches (on/off) for throttles, and their only preventive maintenance consists of refilling ice in the beer cooler and they can't break them............;) :p Nuff said.
On a serious note, I've NEVER run the loose bearings in any of my Hi Perf Motors and don't know anyone who has. I've also NEVER had a rod bearing issue in ANY of my 7500 - 8500 RPM motors.
If that ain't enough, check Stokers (racers) reply. End of discussion.
jenksam
10-15-2009, 07:35 AM
if they hold up for two hooligan brothers that have boats with light switches (on/off) for throttles, and their only preventive maintenance consists of refilling ice in the beer cooler and they can't break them............;) :p Nuff said.
On a serious note, I've NEVER run the loose bearings in any of my Hi Perf Motors and don't know anyone who has. I've also NEVER had a rod bearing issue in ANY of my 7500 - 8500 RPM motors.
If that ain't enough, check Stokers (racers) reply. End of discussion.
THE BROTHERS ARE FOR SURE THE BEST TEST MULES THAT I HAVE EVER HAD:)
NOW JUST FOR IN PUT, ON THE CAGED BEARING BE CAREFUL WHO YOU GET THEM THROUGH AND WHO MAKES THEM THERE ARE A COUPLE OF VENDORS THAT HAVE HIGH FAIL RATES. I USE ONLY THE INA BEARINGS HAVE NOT HAVE ANY PROBLEMS WITH THEM:thumbsup: JUST MY .02
phil blomquist
10-15-2009, 09:00 AM
the results seem to lean towards caged. I have two powerheads . the fingerported2.7 had loose bearings and the 3ltr had caged .None of the bearings failed but why reuse bearings when pistons burnt up. are pro marine bearings ok? thanks phil:smiletest::D
BeefKid
10-15-2009, 09:39 AM
the loose bearings are definetly better, twice the contact surface. mercs use loose bearings and they turn higher then any looper will. im sure either one will work fine for you, but loose is better, for sure.
i got a omc thats seen 9400 with caged:thumbsup: id say they are good
if they hold up for two hooligan brothers that have boats with light switches (on/off) for throttles, and their only preventive maintenance consists of refilling ice in the beer cooler and they can't break them............;) :p Nuff said.
On a serious note, I've NEVER run the loose bearings in any of my Hi Perf Motors and don't know anyone who has. I've also NEVER had a rod bearing issue in ANY of my 7500 - 8500 RPM motors.
If that ain't enough, check Stokers (racers) reply. End of discussion.
:rolleyes::iagree: Well put gary:D
THE BROTHERS ARE FOR SURE THE BEST TEST MULES THAT I HAVE EVER HAD:)
:D:D always put your stuff to the test!! LET IT EAT!!
JUST REMEMBER YOU AINT FIRST YOUR LAST!!:D:thumbsup:
jenksam
10-15-2009, 11:09 AM
the results seem to lean towards caged. I have two powerheads . The fingerported2.7 had loose bearings and the 3ltr had caged .none of the bearings failed but why reuse bearings when pistons burnt up. Are pro marine bearings ok? Thanks phil:smiletest::d
that is were i get mine through you will have to ask what vendor they have in stock. For awile they had some form china that i would not put in anything. I do belive that they have some of the ina in now.
phil blomquist
10-15-2009, 11:21 AM
caged wins out thanks for all the imput. I put the finger ported 2.7 to the side till i get this 3 ltr. up and going wifes cutting into my motor funds i wanted to get both done now. she seems to scream about my HYDROSTREAM:D thanks again phil
phil blomquist
10-15-2009, 11:35 AM
thanks for reply on pro marine bearings. I dont want any china products in my motor chine walking is acceptable though thanks phil:D
2.5_stoker
10-15-2009, 12:44 PM
I would not use the loose ones on an engine that will see over 7000 rpm under either is fine. The problem is not the rollers its that washers.
i would say that the man has spoken!...cant really argue with his know how on an omc!
baja200merk
10-15-2009, 12:55 PM
if they hold up for two hooligan brothers that have boats with light switches (on/off) for throttles, and their only preventive maintenance consists of refilling ice in the beer cooler and they can't break them............;) :p Nuff said.
On a serious note, I've NEVER run the loose bearings in any of my Hi Perf Motors and don't know anyone who has. I've also NEVER had a rod bearing issue in ANY of my 7500 - 8500 RPM motors.
If that ain't enough, check Stokers (racers) reply. End of discussion.
we try to break em, ask any lake tarpon resident:reddevil:
THE BROTHERS ARE FOR SURE THE BEST TEST MULES THAT I HAVE EVER HAD:)
NOW JUST FOR IN PUT, ON THE CAGED BEARING BE CAREFUL WHO YOU GET THEM THROUGH AND WHO MAKES THEM THERE ARE A COUPLE OF VENDORS THAT HAVE HIGH FAIL RATES. I USE ONLY THE INA BEARINGS HAVE NOT HAVE ANY PROBLEMS WITH THEM:thumbsup: JUST MY .02
bout to test a 3.3 here soon :D
jenksam
10-15-2009, 01:27 PM
we try to break em, ask any lake tarpon resident:reddevil:
bout to test a 3.3 here soon :D
KEEP DREAMIN:rolleyes::thumbsup:
scc82
10-15-2009, 01:34 PM
racer, not questioning you, but what is the theory behind the caged bearings being better? i know thats what everybody is saying, but no one has given a reason. like i said earlier, im sure either one would work fine for him. i would think that twice the surface area to help bear the load would be a good thing, but i really havent seen worn out wrist pins and bearings since 135 and 75hp omc from the seventys, so im sure the caged are probally ok, i wonder why omc replaced them with twice as many needles and no cage? not trying to argue , but dont understand why you would not want to use loose needles in high rpm motors. all mercs v6 and most other high rpm motors use loose needles. is this just a omc v6 looper thing? again not being smartass just would like to educate myself better, from someone with your credentials:thumbsup:
thanks stan carson,:cheers:
jenksam
10-15-2009, 02:27 PM
This is the way that it was explained to me.
With the full complement (loose) roller bearing it is harder to dissipate the heat.with one roller touching the other one will roll one way wile the other the other way.
The the caged bearing you do not have this as well the rollers are in place and rolling in a streight direction.
racer, not questioning you, but what is the theory behind the caged bearings being better? I know thats what everybody is saying, but no one has given a reason. Like i said earlier, im sure either one would work fine for him. I would think that twice the surface area to help bear the load would be a good thing, but i really havent seen worn out wrist pins and bearings since 135 and 75hp omc from the seventys, so im sure the caged are probally ok, i wonder why omc replaced them with twice as many needles and no cage? Not trying to argue , but dont understand why you would not want to use loose needles in high rpm motors. All mercs v6 and most other high rpm motors use loose needles. Is this just a omc v6 looper thing? Again not being smartass just would like to educate myself better, from someone with your credentials:thumbsup:
Thanks stan carson,:cheers:
phil blomquist
10-15-2009, 07:02 PM
amen to that my brothers racer will be doing my fingerported 2.7 resleeve job soon as i can i have only been on short time and figured that out thanks again phil:D:thumbsup:
racer
10-15-2009, 09:10 PM
I have seen several of the washers on the loose bearing set up break, every time they show signs of heat as sam mentioned
phil blomquist
10-15-2009, 09:58 PM
Racer ,thanks for the information on the bearings getting parts ordered soon wanted to get it right. will send ya 2.7 for resleeve soon thanks again phil:smiletest:
frank jackson
10-17-2009, 04:09 PM
you may want to open the bores up to 3ltr specs and run pistons from the 4ltr v8 .
6Killer
10-17-2009, 04:22 PM
caged bearings and big rods last and last. Gets my vote.
phil blomquist
10-17-2009, 04:29 PM
its already bored out to 3ltr not much room left plus somebody machined too far then put std piston in hole flopped around so much ring caught sideop exhaust port and chipped about1/4 out of sleeve see picture on page 4 titled finger ported 200 thanks phil:nonod:
phil blomquist
10-17-2009, 04:31 PM
agreed completlythanks
phil blomquist
10-17-2009, 04:46 PM
sorry wrong page its on page 6 under finger ported 200
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.3 Copyright © 2026 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.