User Tag List

Page 71 of 348 FirstFirst ... 21 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 121 171 ... LastLast
Results 1,051 to 1,065 of 5210
  1. #1051
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Annapolis, MD ragboat capital of the world
    Posts
    11,463
    Thanks (Given)
    591
    Thanks (Received)
    164
    Likes (Given)
    2428
    Likes (Received)
    445
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Old fiberglass View Post
    A few pics of 850, 125 & 135 block on the transfer port side. I believe the 850 and 1000 block are just about the same.
    Newer 850's are the same 89 ci block as a 1000, older 850's were 76 (same as the 800) I think the 76 and 89/93 ci motors are enough different that stacks won't fit. A factory black 850 is definitely an 89.

    I was pretty certain the 1100 was significantly smaller than the 1250

  2. #1052
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Annapolis, MD ragboat capital of the world
    Posts
    11,463
    Thanks (Given)
    591
    Thanks (Received)
    164
    Likes (Given)
    2428
    Likes (Received)
    445
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)
    Congratulations on your comeback !

  3. #1053
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Phoenix AZ
    Posts
    728
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Given)
    1
    Likes (Received)
    6
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Mark75H View Post
    Newer 850's are the same 89 ci block as a 1000, older 850's were 76 (same as the 800) I think the 76 and 89/93 ci motors are enough different that stacks won't fit. A factory black 850 is definitely an 89.

    I was pretty certain the 1100 was significantly smaller than the 1250
    Thanks for the info. If the blocks were the same what was the difference between the 850 and 1000's. Carbs, porting and so forth ?? The one I put up a picture of was originially white, but had a Krylon rebuild at some point in it's life.

    From Powerboat, here is a picture of the twin at Parker and one of his singles in Paris.

    During that time, all of the Molinari's had a rectangular metal name plate attached to the cowl support just behind the cockpit of each boat which was inscribed Scafo Angelo Molinari. I guess someone at OMC thought that was a bit much and decided to mimmick the plate. At Miami Marine Stadium, I was walking past a McDonald that Ted was about to put in the water and had to do a double take. They had placed a piece of gray duck tape in that same location and, in magic marker, had written Scafo Wilber McDonald! They enjoyed a big laugh when they saw my reaction to their handywork.
    Who says those OMC guys didn't have a sense of humor.
    Last edited by Old fiberglass; 06-09-2009 at 10:42 AM.

  4. #1054
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Annapolis, MD ragboat capital of the world
    Posts
    11,463
    Thanks (Given)
    591
    Thanks (Received)
    164
    Likes (Given)
    2428
    Likes (Received)
    445
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Old fiberglass View Post
    If the blocks were the same what was the difference between the 850 and 1000's. Carbs, porting and so forth ??
    Yep.

  5. #1055
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Granite Quarry, NC
    Posts
    4,012
    Thanks (Given)
    5
    Thanks (Received)
    35
    Likes (Given)
    29
    Likes (Received)
    85
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Mark75H View Post
    Yep.
    When the 1000"s first came out Mercury elimnated the 76 cu in 800 and came out with the 89 cu in. 850 which shared a block with the 1000. I had an 850 on a 13' Powercat in 64' and it was was basically a detuned 1000. The 1000's were painted blacxk while the 850's had the old white color with a black wrap around like the departed 800's. We never got to run the old 800 dockbusters against the 850's since very few 850's actually made it to the race course. The 1100 had the first SS ignition and I thought it had a larger block than the 1000. (at least I believe it a few more Cu.In's) can someone confirm that it was neither an 89.9 block like the 1000 or a larger block like the 1250? In which case it would mean that Merc tooled up a new block for a two year run????...or simply bored out the older 89.9? One of the reasons my memory is vague around this era is that for about two years we were playing with OMC's new 115's and I raced them for a season as the 1250 was coming out...... We quickly jumped back but by then the 1250 "problems" were ironed out.
    Last edited by T2x; 06-09-2009 at 12:55 PM.
    20 Foot Switzer Wing 2 X S3000 (Dust'n the Wind II)
    !6 foot Wood Eltro Vee (2X Merc 1500's) (Dust'n the Wind IV)
    15 foot Powercat 15C (2 X Merc 1500) (Dust'n the Wind III)
    (Single engine boats are lacking something)
    15’ Wooden Switzer Shooting Star...
    16 foot Lee Craft Merc S 3000-(Gold Dust II)
    (The exception proves the rule)
    Obsolete and Proud of it

  6. #1056
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Phoenix AZ
    Posts
    728
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Given)
    1
    Likes (Received)
    6
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    can someone confirm that it was neither an 89.9 block like the 1000 or a larger block like the 1250?
    Confirmed it on post 1092 with the stack and 1100 block picture. I believe the 1250 block was vary close to the 1350, 1400 & 1500.

    Notice your last post number was 1100...ironic.

  7. #1057
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Annapolis, MD ragboat capital of the world
    Posts
    11,463
    Thanks (Given)
    591
    Thanks (Received)
    164
    Likes (Given)
    2428
    Likes (Received)
    445
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by T2x View Post
    When the 1000"s first came out Mercury elimnated the 76 cu in 800 and came out with the 89 cu in. 850 which shared a block with the 1000.
    For 1963 & 64, yes, but in 1962 only the 1000 was 89, the '62 850 was still 76 (that is why I was saying early 850 vs late 850)


    The 1100 was a 2 year run of the bored out 89 and had the largest bore Merc used on an inline 6. I am pretty certain it shares its crank with the 89.

    The 1250 and 1350 were also only 2 year runs for their respective blocks (these might also share a crank they have the same stroke), so there is a pattern.

    The 99ci 1250 (and all later 99ci 6's) went back to the same bore as the 1000 but used more stroke.

  8. #1058
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    2,105
    Thanks (Given)
    126
    Thanks (Received)
    245
    Likes (Given)
    128
    Likes (Received)
    687
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Owen L. Steele.....con't

    Quote Originally Posted by willabee View Post
    My whole point to all this is to demonstrate how racing activity was now consuming much more time from the people in the Blue Room. As all of this is going on, Jimmy and Gary are attending more races.....both NOA and APBA..... There was no talk about forming a Racing Team or department, at least none of us heard any. However, unbeknownst to us, there was a bunch of that kind of dialogue taking place between Bill Steele, Jimmy Kubasta and Gary Garbrecht at meetings in Fond du lac. Mr. K obvoiusly knew what was going on,......
    The activity level on racing projects continued to rachet up. When we ran out of weather, we went to Lake X. The big truck that was used to haul complete engines was now assigned to the department. We gutted the inside and installed racks to hold gearcases and short blocks. Cabinets for spare parts were built and a hoist and big tool box were added and off to races it would go. For a while, we invoiced the racers for what they got from the truck, but that policy didn't last long. Of course those that were running "memo billed" equipment were not among those receiving a bill.

    Sometime early 1968 is when I think I somehow found out about the conversations taking place with Jimmy and Gary regarding a Racing department. Their thinking was that they wanted to do it, but didn't want to under the existing chain of command. They wanted to bypass Steele and report directly to the boss. Their idea was that one of them would be responsible for NOA and the other APBA. They figured that somehow they could keep putting the decision off on starting this program until Mr. K got involved and then they would tell him what they wanted to do and why. They were convinced that it would ultimately turn out the way they had planned.

    The BP's came out and racing was now the only thing a few of us in the Blue Room were involved with. Another truck was purchased and set up strickly for props and prop work. Molinari's were coming over and we were setting up other types of boats to be "memo billed" to different drivers to cover various classes of competition. For the most part, I was having a ball. Imagine the size of the wallet a person would have needed to buy all the different equipment that I was now getting to test.....and being paid to do it. Wasn't paid much, but paid just the same. Man, what a unique opportunity.

    To be continued.....(sorry Ol' Glass )
    Last edited by willabee; 06-10-2009 at 08:12 AM.

  9. #1059
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    2,105
    Thanks (Given)
    126
    Thanks (Received)
    245
    Likes (Given)
    128
    Likes (Received)
    687
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Owen L. Steele.....con't

    Quote Originally Posted by willabee View Post
    Actually, there is an interesting "behind the scenes" story that goes with all of this. No time to tell it right now, but I"ll come back to it.
    To conclude the "behind the scenes" story that I set out to tell, I was on my way back home from Havasu 1968 and made a call to the plant. Normally just reported in to the receptionist with our whereabouts and checked to see if anyone needed anything. Garbrecht got on the line and was quite happy to inform me that he had just come from a meeting in Fond du lac with Mr. Kiekhaefer. Mercury was officially forming a Racing Team to be headed by Gary! He was to report to Bill Steele, but I'm sure he didn't plan on that being long term. They had bought some property on the river west of the Blue Room and Gary was to get his team established and begin the process of setting up shop.

    He asked me if I wanted to be the Foreman of the Team and I accepted. We transferred some people to this department and began moving in. One of the people not involved with this new department was Jimmy! Now I remember.....it was after we had moved in that I was talking to Jimmy and that's when I found out about the meetings he and Gary had been having in Fondy and what their strategy had been. Obviously Gary had decided on a new strategy and it didn't include sharing the title.

    Jimmy stayed away from racing for a while. Gary did ask him for some help later with a stacker program and Jimmy agreed, but that arrangement was short lived. Jimmy got involved with Merc's sorry snowmobile effort and was instrumental in turning that machine into a race winner. Time heals wounds and ultimately Jimmy became Manager of Hi Performance Products.....by then, Steele had been moved aside and Gary was in charge of all racing.
    Last edited by willabee; 06-10-2009 at 10:33 AM.

  10. Likes Lake X Kid liked this post
  11. #1060
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    france
    Posts
    1,557
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    13
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Like i said at the very start------ The bugger did not take prisoners ----there were only heavy casualties.

  12. #1061
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    2,105
    Thanks (Given)
    126
    Thanks (Received)
    245
    Likes (Given)
    128
    Likes (Received)
    687
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Old fiberglass View Post
    Question......Parker 1968......I'm not clear about why this happened. An inboard came in first.....Merten's 18' wing second.......the 20' 199 wing came in third. The 199 guys were weekend warrior independants how did it happen they beat most of the Mercury and OMC guys ??? Do tell......
    I wanted to come back to this question and try to paint a better picture of the timing of factory involvement. I think using Broadway Joe Habay as an example might get the job done.

    Mid 1967 - Chicago/Milwaukee marathon - Joe is driving an twin OMC powered Souter.....a factory boat. Merc has no factory entrys.

    Mid 1968 - Joe comes to Oshkosh, the BlueRoom, to test and pick up his "memo billed" new Switzer V with twin 1250 BP's. He was offered this ride to make the switch.

    Mid 1969 - Joe, a HVAC business owner in Yipsilanti, Michigan is hired by Merc and moves to LaHabra, California to work at Ron Jones shop. He is to rig and test the new creations by Jones.

    It appears that OMC already had their team in 1967, unless it was just for offshore at that time and then brached out as Merc became more involved. Using Parker 9 Hour results, 1968 had very little factory involvement.....a Schnoonover and maybe a Ron Hill, with just one outboard cracking the top ten. Then in 1969, you see that the outboards had six of the top ten places. That's a testimonial to the fact that the factorys were building more and better equipment just for racing, plus the fact that their were a few more factory entrys. By 1970 the top ten is all factory entrys! That's quite a swing in a short amount of time.

    Here's the picture of Don Clark from Powerboat's coverage of the 69 Parker race. Obviously they didn't think it was a big deal, their written text was less than a full page and they had pictures of about eight boats, some like this.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Don Clark - Molinari - Parker 1969.jpg  

  13. #1062
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Phoenix AZ
    Posts
    728
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Given)
    1
    Likes (Received)
    6
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Thanks for the clarification. I always thought Mercury was more involved at an earlier date. Sounds like in the early days it was like the big 3 car manufacturers....sliding special parts out the back door to racers.

    Some might say the factory involvment made it harder/impossible for the independants by the time the 1970's rolled around. Too bad boat racing doesn't generate the excitment today as it did back in the day.

  14. #1063
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Granite Quarry, NC
    Posts
    4,012
    Thanks (Given)
    5
    Thanks (Received)
    35
    Likes (Given)
    29
    Likes (Received)
    85
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Old fiberglass View Post
    Thanks for the clarification. I always thought Mercury was more involved at an earlier date. Sounds like in the early days it was like the big 3 car manufacturers....sliding special parts out the back door to racers.

    Some might say the factory involvment made it harder/impossible for the independants by the time the 1970's rolled around. Too bad boat racing doesn't generate the excitment today as it did back in the day.
    There is no doubt that the excitement level has dropped significantly in recent years.....

    Back to the factory involvement issue: in the early to mid 60's Mercury backed dealers (Dave Craig, Johnny Covals/Dick O'dea, Jon Culver), employees (Odell, Sirois, etc) and ? (Chuck Mersereau) with boats and engines. By 1965 engines were beginning to find there way into various racing dealerships( K&K OB where I raced out of, Valachovic Marine,etc, etc). with "memo billing" (a wink and a nod). Some boats from manufacturers like Glastron and Dorsett also were delivered with "special" construction for racing at drastically reduced pricing or memo billing as well. That was the environment prior to the era of Willabee's description above.

    T2x
    20 Foot Switzer Wing 2 X S3000 (Dust'n the Wind II)
    !6 foot Wood Eltro Vee (2X Merc 1500's) (Dust'n the Wind IV)
    15 foot Powercat 15C (2 X Merc 1500) (Dust'n the Wind III)
    (Single engine boats are lacking something)
    15’ Wooden Switzer Shooting Star...
    16 foot Lee Craft Merc S 3000-(Gold Dust II)
    (The exception proves the rule)
    Obsolete and Proud of it

  15. #1064
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    2,124
    Thanks (Given)
    642
    Thanks (Received)
    288
    Likes (Given)
    1920
    Likes (Received)
    949
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Thumbs down Parker 1968

    Quote Originally Posted by willabee View Post
    Can't find 1968 at the moment, ----- Seems like only one outboard cracked the top ten in 1968, don't remember for sure.

    1969 was:
    1970 was:
    f
    1968 was:??---
    Bill Sirois and I finished sixth in Lonnie Todd's Wing, "Hot Toddy"; Ernie Threlkeld finished seventh or eighth in the OMC single pipe Wing; I think Bob Massey was in the top ten in his Wing: Doen't anyone have the official results?

  16. #1065
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Annapolis, MD ragboat capital of the world
    Posts
    11,463
    Thanks (Given)
    591
    Thanks (Received)
    164
    Likes (Given)
    2428
    Likes (Received)
    445
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)
    From 1942 until 1967 OMC was officially out of racing. Around 1960 they started sneaking a little bit into racing with Ralph Evinrude's personal money but made no overt effort as a company until 1967 - taking Kiekhaefer completely by surprise.

    Suddenly there was a new motor and new brands to look at, talk about, and more importantly, write about ... and it wasn't Merc

    Psychologically, Kiekhaefer was playing catchup in '67 and '68, but in reality OMC's efforts, though dramatic, were minimal and Merc still dominated OPC racing. Strang carefully chose his races, his boats and his drivers for maximum return on a minimal investment ... and it worked ... photographers took pictures of the new equipment, typewriters clacked away and type was set ... OMC's return was big news; that they won races was even more news aka free publicity.

    This is why there was a sudden boom in factory involvement from all sides in the late 60's

Page 71 of 348 FirstFirst ... 21 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 121 171 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Frank Mole Transport